Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Pharmacotherapy ; 20(4): 461-9, 2000 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10772376

RESUMO

We examined the cost-effectiveness of sparfloxacin compared with other selected oral antimicrobials in outpatient treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) using clinical pathway-based decision analysis. Cost estimates were obtained from medical claims databases and Medicare reimbursement schedules. Probability estimates were derived from published clinical trials, the medical literature, and clinical expert opinion. Overall adjusted efficacy rates were 89% for sparfloxacin, 79.4% for azithromycin, 77.8% for clarithromycin, 73% for cefaclor, 70.8% for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and 69% for erythromycin. The expected total cost/CAP episode of treatment with sparfloxacin was $216.07 compared with $258.97, $297.08, $345.75, $389.80, and $395.93 for azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, and cefaclor, respectively. Therapy with sparfloxacin for managing CAP is cost effective-relative to other commonly prescribed antibiotics, resulting in net cost savings.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Antituberculosos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Fluoroquinolonas , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/economia , Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/economia , Anti-Infecciosos/economia , Antituberculosos/economia , Azitromicina/economia , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Cefaclor/economia , Cefaclor/uso terapêutico , Claritromicina/economia , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/economia , Eritromicina/economia , Eritromicina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Pneumonia/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 32(5): 770-7, 1998 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9820446

RESUMO

We assessed the frequency and costs of hospitalizations in patients receiving tacrolimus (FK506) compared with patients receiving cyclosporine A for immunosuppression during 1 year after kidney transplantation. Four hundred twelve cadaveric kidney transplant recipients were randomized onto a phase III, prospective, multicenter, clinical trial. Hospital billing data were collected for 1 year posttransplantation. Total inpatient costs were calculated from billed charges and standardized to 1995 US dollars. Medical resource utilization rates and inpatient costs were compared between treatment groups using unpaired Student's t-tests. Complete billing data (transplantation and all posttransplantation hospitalizations) were available for 65% (268 of 412) of the study patients. Among tacrolimus and cyclosporine patients with complete billing data, the rates of allograft rejection were 32% and 47%, respectively (P=0.009), and the rates of rehospitalization during the year after transplantation were 53% and 63%, respectively (P=0.080). The mean per-episode rehospitalization costs were significantly lower among tacrolimus-treated patients compared with cyclosporine-treated patients ($7,495 v $11,497; P=0.031), and the mean total rehospitalization costs were significantly lower in the tacrolimus group compared with the cyclosporine group ($8,550 v $14,869; P=0.029). In addition, the total 1-year hospitalization costs (including transplantation and posttransplantation hospitalizations) were significantly lower in the tacrolimus group compared with the cyclosporine group ($53,435 v $61,191; P=0.046). Compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, tacrolimus-based immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients was associated with a significantly lower rate of rejection, which was associated with significantly lower per-episode rehospitalization costs, lower total 1-year rehospitalization costs, and lower total 1-year hospitalization costs.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Preços Hospitalares , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim/economia , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Cadáver , Ciclosporina/economia , Feminino , Georgia/epidemiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/economia , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Imunossupressores/economia , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Tacrolimo/economia , Transplante Homólogo
3.
Qual Life Res ; 7(3): 235-44, 1998 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9584554

RESUMO

The objective of the study was to compare the validity of asthma-specific and generic health outcome measures in relation to changes in the severity of asthma and to treatment. Adult patients (n = 142) participating in a randomized placebo-controlled trial at six clinics were assessed at baseline, prior to the withdrawal (placebo) or continuation of treatment with Vanceril and again after 8 weeks. The criterion measures of change in severity included pulmonary function expressed as the percent predicted FEV1, five physician-assessed asthma severity measures (cough, chest tightness, wheezing, shortness of breath and overall condition) and two patient-assessed severity measures (night-time symptoms and overall symptoms). The 8 week change scores were estimated for all generic and specific measures and the results were compared across groups of patients who did and did not change in terms of clinical criteria of disease severity and across treatment groups. The responsiveness of each generic and specific measure was estimated independently using the relative validity (RV) methodology, which compares F-ratios for the mean change scores across measures in analyses of the same comparison groups. RV coefficients estimate how much worse each measure discriminated between comparison groups, relative to the best measure (RV = 1.0). Four standardized asthma-specific measures and a total scale score (based on the Marks questionnaire), an individualized asthma-specific scale measuring limitations in activities most important to each patient (based on the Juniper method) and two newly-developed scales measuring physical and psychosocial symptoms were used as outcome measures, generic health outcome measures included eight functional health and well-being scales as well as the physical and mental health summary scales from the SF-36 health survey. A standardized asthma-specific scale was most valid in discriminating between groups of patients who did and did not change according to all of the clinical criterion variables studied and in discriminating between treated and untreated groups. Different scales performed best, depending on the clinical criterion. The asthma-specific Marks breathlessness scale was significant in all nine comparisons (RV = 0.62-1.0) and was most valid in discriminating between groups in six of nine tests. The overall scale also performed well in all comparisons (RV = 0.58-1.0). The newly-developed physical symptoms scale was significant in discriminating between groups in eight out of nine tests (RV = 0.52-1.0) and was most valid in three of the nine, including the treatment comparison. The psychosocial impact scale discriminated significantly in eight of the nine comparisons (RV = 0.16-0.38), but was less valid than other specific measures. The asthma-specific individualized activities scale discriminated significantly in seven of the nine tests, but performed less well than the other specific measures (RV = 0.21-0.35) and was not significant in the treatment comparison. One or more SF-36 scales discriminated significantly between groups in all nine comparisons. Two of those scales (physical functioning and role-physical) were consistently more valid than the others (RV = 0.17 and 0.58, respectively) and were the only two generic scales that discriminated between groups of patients defined in terms of changes in FEV1 (RV = 0.26-0.58). The SF-36 physical summary scale discriminated significantly between groups in all nine comparisons (RV = 0.19-0.61) and was the most valid generic measure in the treatment comparison (RV = 0.55). The SF-36 mental summary scale was significant only for the two patient-assessed changes in disease severity (RV = 0.31 and 0.32) and for physician-assessed overall severity (RV = 0.12). A comprehensive battery of generic and specific measures is likely to be most useful in understanding the impact of changes in disease severity on the functional health and well-being of adults with asthma, a


Assuntos
Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Beclometasona/uso terapêutico , Análise Discriminante , Feminino , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Transplantation ; 64(12): 1738-43, 1997 Dec 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9422413

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated health-related quality of life (HQL) in kidney transplant patients participating in a multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase III trial comparing tacrolimus to cyclosporine. HQL data were available for 303 of 412 patients and assessed with the SF-36 Health Survey and six multi-item scales: Current Health, Health Outlook, Health Distress, Fleming Self-Esteem, Bergner Physical Appearance, and Sexual Functioning. METHODS: Patients completed surveys at baseline, week 6, and months 3, 6, and 12. The mean change in HQL was evaluated by rejection occurrence and number of hospitalizations. Analysis of covariance was used to model endpoint HQL scores as a function of treatment group and baseline HQL. RESULTS: All scales but two met psychometric standards for group-level comparisons. Baseline demographics and HQL scores were not different by treatment. The mean HQL change was lower for patients with rejection compared with no rejection in seven of eight SF-36 scales and three of four remaining supplemental scales. One year after transplantation, study patients were functioning at least as well as half of the general population in Vitality and Role-Emotional Functioning, moving from the 18th percentile of the U.S. population scores to the 50th percentile for Vitality and 54th percentile for Role-Emotional Functioning. Patients improved their percentile ranking by at least 20 points in five of eight SF-36 scales. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with kidney disease demonstrate substantial HQL burden before transplantation, and transplantation is associated with substantial HQL improvements. Rejection is associated with less HQL improvement. Endpoint HQL values were significantly different (P<0.05) by treatment, favoring tacrolimus, in the Bergner Physical Appearance scale, which was designed to measure the HQL impact of side effects such as gingival hyperplasia and facial hirsutism on physical appearance.


Assuntos
Ciclosporina/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Tacrolimo/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA