Disparate Risk Factors Among Pregnant Veterans Using Veterans Administration Health Benefits for Community-Based Obstetrical Care.

INTRODUCTION: Veterans using the Veterans Administration Health Care System (VAHCS) for obstetrical care experience disparate pregnancy-related risks and health outcomes when compared to their pregnant counterparts. This study examined the prevalence of risk factors associated with pregnancy-related comorbidities among U.S. Veterans receiving obstetrical care using VAHCS benefits in Birmingham, Alabama. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of pregnant Veterans receiving care at a large Veterans Administration facility from 2018 to 2021. Using one-sample t-tests, the data from the study charts were compared to the Alabama overall prevalence of tobacco and alcohol use, pregnancy-related hypertension/preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes and, when the Alabama data were unavailable, the U.S. national average prevalence of overweight, obesity, pre-pregnancy hypertension, posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety among patients receiving obstetrical care. The institutional review board at the Birmingham VAHCS approved the study, with an exemption for human subjects research. RESULTS: The study sample (N = 210) experienced higher levels of obesity (42.3% vs. 24.3%, P < .001), tobacco (21.9% vs. 10.8%, P < .001) and alcohol (19.5% vs. 5.4%, P < .001) use, pre-pregnancy hypertension (10.5% vs. 2.1%, P < .001), posttraumatic stress disorder (33.8% vs. 3.3%, P < .001), anxiety (66.7% vs. 15.2%, P < .001), and depression (66.7% vs. 15.0, P < .001). Fewer patients in the study sample were classified as overweight (16.7% vs. 25.5%, P < .001), developed pregnancy-related hypertension/preeclampsia (7.6% vs. 14.4%, P < .001), or were diagnosed with gestational diabetes (7.1% vs. 10.2%, P < .001). The results did not vary by race or age. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the need for further examination of social factors that may be driving disparities among pregnant Veterans, who may benefit from supplemental services to address modifiable comorbidities. Additionally, the implementation of a centralized database to track pregnancy-related outcomes for Veterans would allow these comorbidities to be more closely monitored and addressed. Heightened awareness of a patient's Veteran status and associated increased risks can alert providers to screen for depression and anxiety more frequently and to familiarize themselves with additional services the VAHCS may offer to patients. These steps could improve referrals to counseling and/or targeted exercise interventions.

Screening for eating disorders across genders in college students: Initial validation of the brief assessment of stress and eating.

Given that eating disorders (EDs) are relatively common in college populations, it is important to have reliable and valid tools to identify students so that they can be referred to evidence-based care. Although research supports the psychometric properties of existing ED screens for identifying cases of EDs, most studies have been conducted in samples of young white-majority women or have not reported the psychometric properties of the screening tool in men. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to validate a brief, 10-item screening tool for the identification of EDs-the brief assessment of stress and eating (BASE). METHOD: Participants were college students (N = 596; 68.2% cisgender women) from a large Midwestern university who completed the BASE and SCOFF. The Eating Disorders Diagnostic Survey was used to generate DSM-5 ED diagnoses. We evaluated area under the curve (AUC) for both receiver operating curves (ROC) and precision-recall curves (PRC). RESULTS: Both the BASE and SCOFF performed significantly better than chance at identifying probable EDs in cisgender women (BASE AUC: ROC = .787, PRC = .633, sensitivity = .733, specificity = .697; SCOFF AUC: ROC = .810, PRC = .684, sensitivity = .793, specificity = .701). However, the BASE (AUC: ROC = .821, PRC = .605, sensitivity = .966, specificity = .495) significantly outperformed the SCOFF (AUC: ROC = .710, PRC = .354, sensitivity = .828, specificity = .514) for identifying probable EDs in cisgender college men. DISCUSSION: The BASE is appropriate for student healthcare and college research settings. Because the BASE outperforms the SCOFF in college men, results from the current study are expected to contribute to improved identification of EDs on college campuses. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: The BASE is a new screening tool to identify eating disorders. The BASE performed as well as, if not better than, the SCOFF (particularly in men). Given the need for brief, psychometrically strong, and unbiased ED screening tools in college students, the current study helps address an unmet student healthcare need that we expect will contribute to improved identification of EDs on college campuses.

HiTOP Assessment of the Somatoform Spectrum and Eating Disorders.

We report on Phase 1 efforts of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) measurement subgroup tasked with developing provisional scales for the somatoform spectrum and eating disorders. In Study 1, items were written to assess five somatoform spectrum constructs (bodily distress symptoms, conversion symptoms, health anxiety, disease conviction, and somatic preoccupation). Scale development analyses were conducted on 550 university students. The conversion symptom items were too infrequently endorsed and were set aside for Phase 2. Analyses of the other items yielded four scales corresponding closely to their hypothesized structure. In Study 2, we delineated 15 specific feeding and eating disorder constructs. A sample of 400 university students were administered candidate items and several eating disorder questionnaires for criterion validity. Analyses yielded six scales capturing previously described constructs, tapping content related to body image and weight concerns, restricting and purging, cognitive restraint, binging, excessive exercise, and muscle building. Two scales representing additional constructs deemed to be of high clinical import-negative attitude towards obesity and avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder-were retained for Phase 2, for a total of eight scales. Overall, we concluded that Phase 1 had been successful at generating a comprehensive set of provisional scales for inclusion in Phase 2.

New Horizons in Measurement: a Review of Novel and Innovative Approaches to Eating-Disorder Assessment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Eating disorders are serious mental-health concerns that will affect over 30 million individuals in the USA at some point in their lives. Eating disorders occur across the lifespan, in a variety of ethnicities and races, in both men and women, and across the socioeconomic spectrum. Given the prevalence and severity of eating disorders, it is important that clinicians and researchers have access to appropriate assessment tools to aid in the early identification and treatment referral, differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and progress monitoring, and to ensure valid research findings. In this review, we describe novel and innovative assessment tools that were developed within the past 5 years for utilization in research and/or clinical practice with individuals with eating disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified six multidimensional assessments for eating disorders, all of which can be administered online (with some also offering paper-and-pencil versions). Strengths of the measures included good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. However, in part, due to problematic scale construction methods, certain scales had poor discriminant validity and most were developed and validated in mostly female samples. There are promising new eating disorder measures from which to choose; however, many measures continue to be limited by poor discriminant validity and need additional validation prior to incorporation into routine research and clinical practice.

Do state mental health plans address the New Freedom Commission's goals for children's mental health?

The latest initiative to address mental health needs of the nation, including those of children and youth, is the President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (NFC). The NFC formulated a benchmark of six goals and related recommendations toward which the U.S. should strive, including the recommendation that each state develop a comprehensive mental health plan. It is not clear, however, whether the states' developed plans address the goals established by the NFC and to what degree. This project provides a summary of 50 state mental health plans regarding children and youth in the U.S. by examining components that address each of the six NFC goals and is a test of federal leadership on a state issue. Results indicate that state mental health plans addressed the NFC goals to differing degrees with specific attention to children and youth mental health services. Overall, the NFC goal of eliminating disparities in mental health services was addressed most completely, while the NFC goal of understanding that mental health and physical health are associated was addressed least often. The information provided by this analysis represents a first step in gaining a comprehensive picture about public policies for the mental health of children, adolescents, and their families.