Assessment of frailty by paramedics using the clinical frailty scale - an inter-rater reliability and accuracy study.

BACKGROUND: Frailty assessment by paramedics in the prehospital setting is understudied. The goals of this study were to assess the inter-rater reliability and accuracy of frailty assessment by paramedics using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study with paramedics exposed to 30 clinical vignettes created from real-life situations. There was no teaching intervention prior to the study and paramedics were only provided with the French version of the CFS (definitions and pictograms). The primary outcome was the inter-rater reliability of the assessment. The secondary outcome was the accuracy, compared with the expert-based assessment. Reliability was determined by calculating an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Accuracy was assessed through a mixed effects logistic regression model. A sensitivity analysis was carried out by considering that an assessment was still accurate if the score differed from no more than 1 level. RESULTS: A total of 56 paramedics completed the assessment. The overall assessment was found to have good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.87 [95%CI 0.81-0.93]). The overall accuracy was moderate at 60.6% (95%CI 54.9-66.1) when considering the full scale. It was however much higher (94.8% [95%CI 92.0-96.7] when close assessments were considered as accurate. The only factor associated with accurate assessment was field experience. CONCLUSION: The assessment of frailty by paramedics was reliable in this vignette-based study. However, the accuracy deserved to be improved. Future research should focus on the clinical impact of these results and on the association of prehospital frailty assessment with patient outcomes. REGISTRATION: This study was registered on the Open Science Framework registries ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VDUZY ).

Functional Aging: Integrating Functionality to a Multidimensional Assessment of Healthy Aging.

Worldwide, the number of old adults will peak in the coming decades. Relying solely on the chronological age to make treatment decisions and shape general or specific societal and medical considerations may reinforce ageism and lead to flawed reasoning. Defining physiological age using biological markers is not yet reliable, and an approach based on comorbidities without considering their impact on quality of life is inadequate. A multidimensional approach with strong integration of functionality is presented here to draw a real-world aging approach, easily accessible, clinically relevant, and of societal value.

Masticatory performance in oral function assessment: Alternative methods.

BACKGROUND: Masticatory function declines with age or disease, implicating a poor chewing efficiency and an often-unconscious change for a less healthy, yet easy to chew diet. Timely screening of masticatory function may foster an early-onset diagnosis and potential treatment. The aim of this study was to compare alternative diagnostic tools for masticatory function to a Jelly-scan test. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 70 years and older who were hospitalised for rehabilitation were recruited for this study. A total of four different tests for masticatory function were administered. The Japanese Society of Gerodontology glucose extraction test (Jelly-scan) was used as reference to compare a colour-changing gum test (Gum1-colour) as well as a mixing ability test with a visual (Gum2-visual) and opto-electronical (Gum2-digital) analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to establish the discriminative value, kappa-values were used to estimate individual agreements and correlations were verified using Spearman's tests. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (Men n = 23, Women n = 38) aged 82.4 ± 6.8 years participated in the experiments. The average number of natural teeth was 16.5 ± 10.5, 34.4% of the participants wore removable dentures. For all tests, the sum of sensitivity and specificity was >150%. All test correlated with Jelly-scan (absolute Rho >0.5). With Jelly-scan 51 participants (83.6%) were diagnosed with "masticatory hypofunction". After reducing the cut-off value of the test from 100 mg/dL to 65 mg/dL, only 33 participants (54%) fulfilled the diagnosis. This post-hoc analysis increased the sensitivity of the Gum2-tests and the agreement to kappa >0.5 for all three tests. CONCLUSION: All three tests can be considered useful screening alternatives. In its original version, Jelly-scan may tend to over-diagnose masticatory hypofunction, hence a novel cut-off with better agreement between tests is suggested.

[Intermediate geriatric care in Geneva: experience of ten years]. / Soins intermédiaires gériatriques a l'hôpital des Trois-Chêne: une expérience genevoise de dix ans.

Population aging has generated an increased demand for acute healthcare services in persons aged over 65, who may represent up to half of all patients treated in intensive care units (ICU). However, the number of available ICU beds is limited. Intermediate care units (IntCU) require less human and technical resources, and may represent an interesting alternative to intensive care in the geriatric population. This article describes a 10-year, single centre experience at a geriatrics IntCU in Geneva. We observed a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality after the creation of the IntCU (2000-2001) compared to the 2 years immediately preceding its inception (1998-1999).

The prognostic significance of malnutrition as assessed by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) in older hospitalized patients with a heavy disease burden.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition is common in older persons. However, it is unclear whether malnutrition diagnosed with the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) predicts mortality in older hospitalized patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied the impact of the MNA-short form (MNA-SF) and co-morbidities on long-term mortality in 444 patients (mean age 85.3 ± 6.7; 74.0% women) receiving geriatric inpatient care. In a cross-sectional study we studied the interplay between the MNA, nutritional markers and co-morbidities (using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, CIRS). RESULTS: The prevalence of malnutrition and "at risk of malnutrition", defined by MNA-SF, was 25.5 and 50.5% respectively in our prospective study. CIRS scores (HR = 1.09, p < 0.001) and a low BMI (HR = 0.96, p < 0.05), but not the MNA-SF (HR = 0.79 and 0.89 for "at risk" and malnutrition respectively, P = NS), were associated with 4-year mortality. CIRS scores, albumin and other nutritional markers were similar between MNA categories. High CIRS scores and hypoalbuminemia were observed even in patients with normal MNA scores. There was good agreement (>80%) between the MNA-SF and the complete MNA. CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition as diagnosed with the MNA at admission failed to predict long-term mortality in older inpatients, likely due to the overriding impact of co-morbidities and acute disease.

Efficiency and applicability of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) may benefit frail or chronically ill patients in the emergency department (ED), but take too much time to be performed routinely in ED. An alternative approach is to use first a screening tool to detect high-risk patients and then perform CGA in these patients only. This systematic review focuses on the use and value of CGA in ED for evaluation of older patients and its influence on adverse outcomes. This approach is compared with an alternative one using existing screening tools, validated in ED, to detect high-risk patients needing subsequent CGA. This review ends by suggesting a short assessment of CGA to be used in ED and ways to improve home discharge management from ED. METHODS: A systematic English Medline literature search was conducted in December 2009, with no date limit with the following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms: "Frail Elderly", "Health Services for Aged", "Community Health Nursing", "Emergency Service, Hospital", "Geriatric Assessment", "Patient Discharge", "Risk Assessment" and "Triage". RESULTS: We selected 8 studies on CGA efficiency and 14 on screening tools. CGA in ED is efficient for decreasing functional decline, ED readmission and possibly nursing home admission in high-risk patients. As CGA takes too much time to be performed routinely in ED, validated screening tools can be applied to detect high-risk patients who will benefit most from CGA. CONCLUSIONS: The selected studies demonstrated that screening of high-risk patients is more efficient than age-based screening, and that CGA performed in ED, followed by appropriate interventions, improves outcomes.