Relation of Living in a "Food Desert" to Recurrent Hospitalizations in Patients With Heart Failure.

Food deserts (FD), low-income areas with low access to healthful foods, are associated with higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Few studies have examined the impact of FD on clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF). FD status was assessed in 457 HF patients (mean age 55.9 ± 12.5 years; 50.3% Black) using the Food Desert Research Atlas. The Andersen-Gill extension of Cox model was used to examine the association of living in a FD with risk of repeat hospitalization (all-cause and HF-specific). Patients living in a FD were younger (p = 0.01), more likely to be Black (p <0.0001), less educated (p = 0.003), and less likely to have commercial insurance (p = 0.003). During a median follow-up of 827 (506, 1,379) days, death occurred in 60 (13.1%) subjects, and hospitalizations occurred in 262 (57.3%) subjects. There was no difference in the risk of death based on FD status. The overall frequency of all-cause (94.1 vs 63.6 per 100 patient-years) and HF-specific (59.6 vs 30.5 per 100 patient-years) hospitalizations was higher in subjects who lived in a FD. After adjustment for covariates, living in a FD was associated with an increased risk of repeat all-cause (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 1.63; p = 0.03) and HF-specific (hazard ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.65; p = 0.03) hospitalizations. In conclusion, patients living in a FD have a higher risk of repeat all-cause and HF-specific hospitalization.

Racial differences in the development of de-novo donor-specific antibodies and treated antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in outcomes after heart transplantation, black recipients have worse survival compared with non-black recipients. The source of such disparate outcomes remains largely unknown. We hypothesize that a propensity to generate de-novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) may account for racial differences in sub-optimal outcomes after heart transplant. In this study we aimed to determine the role of dnDSA and AMR in racial disparities in post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: This study was a single-center, retrospective analysis of 137 heart transplant recipients (81% male, 48% black) discharged from Emory University Hospital. Patients were classified as black vs non-black for the purpose of our analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between race and selected outcomes. The primary outcome was the development of dnDSA. Secondary outcomes included treated AMR and a composite of all-cause graft dysfunction or death. RESULTS: After 3.7 years of follow-up, 39 (28.5%) patients developed dnDSA and 19 (13.8%) were treated for AMR. In multivariable models, black race was associated with a higher risk of developing dnDSA (hazard ratio [HR] 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 8.65, p = 0.003) and a higher risk of treated AMR (HR 4.86, 95% CI 1.26 to 18.72, p = 0.021) compared with non-black race. Black race was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause graft dysfunction or death in univariate analyses (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.30, p = 0.044). However, in a multivariable model incorporating dnDSA, black race was no longer a significant risk factor. Only dnDSA development was significantly associated with all-cause graft dysfunction or death (HR 4.85, 95% CI 1.89 to 12.44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Black transplant recipients are at higher risk for the development of dnDSA and treated AMR, which may account for racial disparities in outcomes after heart transplantation.