RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has major ramifications for global health and the economy, with growing concerns about economic recession and implications for mental health. Here we investigated the associations between COVID-19 pandemic-related income loss with financial strain and mental health trajectories over a 1-month course. METHODS: Two independent studies were conducted in the U.S and in Israel at the beginning of the outbreak (March-April 2020, T1; N = 4 171) and at a 1-month follow-up (T2; N = 1 559). Mixed-effects models were applied to assess associations among COVID-19-related income loss, financial strain, and pandemic-related worries about health, with anxiety and depression, controlling for multiple covariates including pre-COVID-19 income. FINDINGS: In both studies, income loss and financial strain were associated with greater depressive symptoms at T1, above and beyond T1 anxiety, worries about health, and pre-COVID-19 income. Worsening of income loss was associated with exacerbation of depression at T2 in both studies. Worsening of subjective financial strain was associated with exacerbation of depression at T2 in one study (US). INTERPRETATION: Income loss and financial strain were uniquely associated with depressive symptoms and the exacerbation of symptoms over time, above and beyond pandemic-related anxiety. Considering the painful dilemma of lockdown versus reopening, with the tradeoff between public health and economic wellbeing, our findings provide evidence that the economic impact of COVID-19 has negative implications for mental health. FUNDING: This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health, the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation, Foundation Dora and Kirsh Foundation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study assesses the attitudes of family practice residents toward their future practice of obstetrics. The decline of family practice obstetrics has resulted in problems of access to care for many areas. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 30 family practice residency programs and were distributed to 353 2nd- and 3rd-year residents; the overall response rate was 85 percent. Respondents were asked to describe factors contributing to their decision whether to practice obstetrics. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of the respondents indicated plans for future obstetrics practice. Reasons for choosing to practice obstetrics included personal interest, believing that obstetrics is an important part of family health care, and desire for diversity in practice. Primary concerns included interference with personal life, fear of lawsuits, and insurance premiums. Those deciding not to practice obstetrics cited interference with personal or professional life and desire for limited practice as deterrents. Important demographic variables predicting future practice included female sex, geographic location, and type of practice desired. CONCLUSION: This study portrays a resurgence in the percentage of family practice residents planning to practice obstetrics and discusses aspects of the training system that merit support to increase the number of family physicians providing obstetric care.