Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 112(1): 82-90, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31685219

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Physician-Payments-Sunshine-Act (PPSA) was introduced in 2010 to provide transparency regarding physician-industry payments by making these payments publicly available. Given potential ethical implications, it is important to understand how these payments are being distributed, particularly as the women orthopaedic workforce increases. The purpose of this study was thus to determine the role of gender and academic affiliation in relation to industry payments within the orthopaedic subspecialties. METHODS: The PPSA website was used to abstract industry payments to Orthopaedic surgeons. The internet was then queried to identify each surgeon's professional listing and gender. Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square tests, and multivariable regression were used to explore the relationships. Significance was set at a value of P < 0.05. RESULTS: In total, 22,352 orthopaedic surgeons were included in the study. Payments were compared between 21,053 men and 1299 women, 2756 academic and 19,596 community surgeons, and across orthopaedic subspecialties. Women surgeons received smaller research and non-research payments than men (both, P < 0.001). There was a larger percentage of women in academics than men (15.9% vs 12.1%, P < 0.001). Subspecialties with a higher percentage of women (Foot & Ankle, Hand, and Pediatrics) were also the subspecialties with the lowest mean industry payments (all P < 0.001). Academic surgeons on average, received larger research and non-research industry payments, than community surgeons (both, P < 0.001). Multivariable linear regression demonstrated that male gender (P = 0.006, P = 0.029), adult reconstruction (both, P < 0.001) and spine (P = 0.008, P < 0.001) subspecialties, and academic rank (both, P < 0.001) were independent predictors of larger industry research and non-research payments. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of the US orthopaedic surgeon workforce received industry payments in 2014. Academic surgeons received larger payments than community surgeons. Despite having a larger percentage of surgeons in academia, women surgeons received lower payments than their male counterparts. Women also had a larger representation in the subspecialties with the lowest payments.


Assuntos
Indústria Manufatureira , Equipamentos Ortopédicos , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Conflito de Interesses , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interinstitucionais , Masculino , Indústria Manufatureira/economia , Indústria Manufatureira/ética , Indústria Manufatureira/métodos , Equipamentos Ortopédicos/economia , Equipamentos Ortopédicos/provisão & distribuição , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/instrumentação , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/economia , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/ética , Cirurgiões Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ortopedia/economia , Ortopedia/ética , Ortopedia/métodos , Fatores Sexuais , Recursos Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA