RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The resources used in treatment for sex offenders with intellectual disabilities have had much research attention, but less has been written about how participants are expected to respond (programme mechanisms). METHODS: A realist evaluation of seven programmes from the UK, Canada, USA, Switzerland and Germany was conducted. In semi-structured interviews, programme designers elucidated how they are intended to work. The data analysis was driven by the realist concern to expose programme mechanisms and intended outcomes. RESULTS: Two main outcomes are increasing risk management capacities and cultivating prosocial identities. These are achieved through developing insights into a person's risks, work on (sexual) self-regulation skills, sexual boundaries and personal values and by developing meaningful social roles and positive relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, there have been changes to some of the treatment resources used. However, there were little differences in terms of the intended programme mechanisms and outcomes, which remained surprisingly consistent.
Assuntos
Criminosos , Deficiência Intelectual/reabilitação , Pessoas com Deficiência Mental/reabilitação , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Gestão de Riscos , Autoimagem , Delitos Sexuais/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Humanos , Masculino , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Educação SexualRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Problem-solving skills training is adaptable, inexpensive and simple to deliver. However, its application with prisoners who self-harm is unknown. The study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a problem-solving training (PST) intervention for prison staff and prisoners who self-harm, to inform the design of a large-scale study. DESIGN AND SETTING: A mixed-methods design used routinely collected data, individual outcome measures, an economic protocol and qualitative interviews at four prisons in Yorkshire and Humber, UK. PARTICIPANTS: (i) Front-line prison staff, (ii) male and female prisoners with an episode of self-harm in the previous 2 weeks. INTERVENTION: The intervention comprised a 1 hour staff training session and a 30 min prisoner session using adapted workbooks and case studies. OUTCOMES: We assessed the study processes-coverage of training; recruitment and retention rates and adequacy of intervention delivery-and available data (completeness of outcome data, integrity of routinely collected data and access to the National Health Service (NHS) resource information). Prisoner outcomes assessed incidence of self-harm, quality of life and depression at baseline and at follow-up. Qualitative findings are presented elsewhere. RESULTS: Recruitment was higher than anticipated for staff n=280, but lower for prisoners, n=48. Retention was good with 43/48 (89%) prisoners completing the intervention, at follow-up we collected individual outcome data for 34/48 (71%) of prisoners. Access to routinely collected data was inconsistent. Prisoners were frequent users of NHS healthcare. The additional cost of training and intervention delivery was deemed minimal in comparison to 'treatment as usual'. Outcome measures of self-harm, quality of life and depression were found to be acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention proved feasible to adapt. Staff training was delivered but on the whole it was not deemed feasible for staff to deliver the intervention. A large-scale study is warranted, but modifications to the implementation of the intervention are required.
Assuntos
Capacitação em Serviço , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Prisioneiros/educação , Resolução de Problemas , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Capacitação em Serviço/economia , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Modelos Educacionais , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/economia , Prisioneiros/psicologia , Prisões/organização & administração , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de VidaRESUMO
RATIONALE: Regardless of health issue, health sector, patient condition, or treatment modality, the chances are that provision is supported by "a guideline" making professionally endorsed recommendations on best practice. Against this background, research has proliferated seeking to evaluate how effectively such guidance is followed. These investigations paint a gloomy picture with many a guideline prompting lip service, inattention, and even opposition. This predicament has prompted a further literature on how to improve the uptake of guidelines, and this paper considers how to draw together lessons from these inquiries. METHODS: This huge body of material presents a considerable challenge for research synthesis, and this paper produces a critical, methodological comparison of 2 types of review attempting to meet that task. Firstly, it provides an overview of the current orthodoxy, namely, "thematic reviews," which aggregate and enumerate the "barriers and facilitators" to guideline implementation. It then outlines a "realist synthesis," focussing on testing the "programme theories" that practitioners have devised to improve guideline uptake. RESULTS: Thematic reviews aim to provide a definitive, comprehensive catalogue of the facilitators and barriers to guideline implementation. As such, they present a restatement of the underlying problems rather than an improvement strategy. The realist approach assumes that the incorporation of any guideline into current practice will produce unintended system strains as different stakeholders wrestle over responsibilities. These distortions will prompt supplementary revisions to guidelines, which in turn beget further strains. Realist reviews follow this dynamic understanding of organisational change. CONCLUSIONS: Health care decision makers operate in systems that are awash with guidelines. But guidelines only have paper authority. Managers do not need a checklist of their pros and cons, because the fate of guidelines depends on their reception rather than their production. They do need decision support on how to engineer and reengineer guidelines so they dovetail with evolving systems of health care delivery.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/organização & administração , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Humanos , Inovação Organizacional , Melhoria de Qualidade , Projetos de Pesquisa , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Urban populations are growing and to accommodate these numbers, cities are becoming more involved in urban renewal programs to improve the physical, social and economic conditions in different areas. This paper explores some of the complexities surrounding the link between urban renewal, health and health inequalities using a theory-driven approach. METHODS: We focus on an urban renewal initiative implemented in Barcelona, the Neighbourhoods Law, targeting Barcelona's (Spain) most deprived neighbourhoods. We present evidence from two studies on the health evaluation of the Neighbourhoods Law, while drawing from recent urban renewal literature, to follow a four-step process to develop a program theory. We then use two specific urban renewal interventions, the construction of a large central plaza and the repair of streets and sidewalks, to further examine this link. DISCUSSION: In order for urban renewal programs to affect health and health inequality, neighbours must use and adapt to the changes produced by the intervention. However, there exist barriers that can result in negative outcomes including factors such as accessibility, safety and security. CONCLUSION: This paper provides a different perspective to the field that is largely dominated by traditional quantitative studies that are not always able to address the complexities such interventions provide. Furthermore, the framework and discussions serve as a guide for future research, policy development and evaluation.
Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , População Urbana , Reforma Urbana/métodos , Planejamento Ambiental , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Características de Residência , Meio Social , EspanhaRESUMO
Planners, managers and policy makers in modern health services are not without ingenuity - they will always try, try and try again. They face deep-seated or 'wicked' problems, which have complex roots in the labyrinthine structures though which healthcare is delivered. Accordingly, the interventions devised to deal with such stubborn problems usually come in the plural. Many different reforms are devised to deal with a particular stumbling block, which may be implemented sequentially, simultaneously or whenever policy fashion or funding dictates. This paper examines this predicament from the perspective of evidence based policy. How might researchers go about reviewing the evidence when they are faced with multiple or indeed competing interventions addressing the same problem? In the face of this plight a rather unheralded form of research synthesis has emerged, namely the 'typological review'. We critically review the fortunes of this strategy. Separating the putative reforms into series of subtypes and producing a scorecard of their outcomes has the unintended effect of divorcing them all from an understanding of how organisations change. A more fruitful approach may lie in a 'theory-driven review' underpinned by an understanding of dynamics of social change in complex organisations. We test this thesis by examining the primary and secondary research on the many interventions designed to tackle a particularly wicked problem, namely the inexorable rise in demand for healthcare.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Inovação Organizacional , Melhoria de Qualidade , Reino UnidoRESUMO
PURPOSE: While clinical care is frequently directed at making patients "feel better," patients' reports on their functioning and well-being (patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) are rarely collected in routine clinical practice. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) has developed a User's Guide for Implementing Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessment in Clinical Practice. This paper summarizes the key issues from the User's Guide. METHODS: Using the literature, an ISOQOL team outlined considerations for using PROs in clinical practice; options for designing the intervention; and strengths, weaknesses, and resource requirements associated with each option. RESULTS: Implementing routine PRO assessment involves a number of methodological and practical decisions, including (1) identifying the goals for collecting PROs in clinical practice, (2) selecting the patients, setting, and timing of assessments, (3) determining which questionnaire(s) to use, (4) choosing a mode for administering and scoring the questionnaire, (5) designing processes for reporting results, (6) identifying aids to facilitate score interpretation, (7) developing strategies for responding to issues identified by the questionnaires, and (8) evaluating the impact of the PRO intervention on the practice. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating PROs in clinical practice has the potential to enhance patient-centered care. The online version of the User's Guide will be updated periodically.
Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Autorrelato , Objetivos , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The Multiple Sclerosis Symptom and Impact Diary (MSSID) was developed to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on HRQoL for use in clinical practice. This paper reports on an assessment of its feasibility and utility in two outpatient samples of people with MS (n = 13 and n = 63) using quantitative and qualitative methods. The response rate in study 2 was 82% and 83% of days were fully completed. Most respondents found the MSSID easy to understand and got into the habit of completing it. Missing items increased over time and those who experienced a relapse had more missing items than those who did not but there was no difference in the number of missed days. Some respondents found completing the MSSID enabled them to manage their lives more effectively and provided useful information to their neurologist. It is concluded that the MSSID is feasible for people with MS to complete and some may find the MSSID helpful as a tool to monitor their condition. Further research is needed to examine clinicians' perceptions of the feasibility and utility of the MSSID within clinical practice.
Assuntos
Prontuários Médicos , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Psicometria/instrumentação , Qualidade de Vida , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/psicologia , Neurologia/instrumentação , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
This paper applies a theory-driven approach to explore why the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in clinical practice, in particular, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments, has little or no apparent influence on clinical decision making. A theory-driven approach involves combining knowledge of whether and how an intervention works. It is argued that such an approach is currently lacking within the literature evaluating the effectiveness of feeding back HRQoL information to clinicians. The paper identifies a number of mechanisms that might give rise to the expected outcomes that are currently implicit within the design of the intervention and hypotheses specified within the trials evaluating the use of HRQoL measures in clinical practice. It then examines how far current clinical practice matches these mechanisms and in doing so, a number of possible explanations for the lack of impact of HRQoL on clinical decision making are reviewed. The influence of HRQoL information on clinical decision making depends on a large number of factors related to the design of the intervention, patients' and clinicians' desire to discuss HRQoL issues within the consultation and the legitimacy that clinicians give to HRQoL instruments. To date, knowledge of how the feedback of HRQoL information to clinicians might improve doctor-patient communication or clinical decision making has yet to sufficiently inform an assessment of whether these aspects of patient care are improved. The paper concludes by specifying how the feedback of HRQoL information to clinicians might be modified to maximise its impact on clinical decision making.