Clinical trials and drug cost savings for Italian health service.

BACKGROUND: The cost of anticancer drugs is constantly growing. The aim of this study was determine the impact in terms of cost reduction for anticancer drug in the Italian Health Service due to patient participation in clinical trials. METHODS: We evaluated the cost of drugs administered to patients treated in clinical trials at the National Cancer Institute of Naples in a four-week time period. Patients with a diagnosis of different cancers were considered, including adjuvant therapy and treatment for advanced disease, pharma sponsored and investigator initiated phase I, II and III clinical studies. We defined the expected standard treatment for each patient and we calculated the cost of the standard antineoplastic drugs that should be administered in clinical practice outside clinical trials. We used the market price of drugs to determine the cost savings value. Costs other than drugs were not included in the cost saving calculation. RESULTS: From 23.10.2017 to 17.11.2017, 126 patients were treated in 34 pharma sponsored and investigator initiated clinical trials, using experimental drugs provided free of charge by the sponsors, for an overall number of 152 cycles of therapy. If these patients were treated with conventional therapies in clinical practice the cost of antineoplastic drugs would account for 517,658 Euros, with an average of 5487 Euros saved per patients for a period of 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials with investigational antineoplastic drugs provided free of charge by Sponsors render considerable cost savings, with a tangible benefit in clinical and administrative strategies to reduce drug expenditures.

Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on cancer immunotherapy in Italy: a survey of young oncologists.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has overwhelmed the health systems worldwide. Data regarding the impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients (CPs) undergoing or candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are lacking. We depicted the practice and adaptations in the management of patients with solid tumors eligible or receiving ICIs during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a special focus on Campania region. METHODS: This survey (25 questions), promoted by the young section of SCITO (Società Campana di ImmunoTerapia Oncologica) Group, was circulated among Italian young oncologists practicing in regions variously affected by the pandemic: high (group 1), medium (group 2) and low (group 3) prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. For Campania region, the physician responders were split into those working in cancer centers (CC), university hospitals (UH) and general hospitals (GH). Percentages of agreement, among High (H) versus Medium (M) and versus Low (L) group for Italy and among CC, UH and GH for Campania region, were compared by using Fisher's exact tests for dichotomous answers and χ2 test for trends relative to the questions with 3 or more options. RESULTS: This is the first Italian study to investigate the COVID-19 impact on cancer immunotherapy, unique in its type and very clear in the results. The COVID-19 pandemic seemed not to affect the standard practice in the prescription and delivery of ICIs in Italy. Telemedicine was widely used. There was high consensus to interrupt immunotherapy in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients and to adopt ICIs with longer schedule interval. The majority of the responders tended not to delay the start of ICIs; there were no changes in supportive treatments, but some of the physicians opted for delaying surgeries (if part of patients' planned treatment approach). The results from responders in Campania did not differ significantly from the national ones. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the efforts of Italian oncologists to maintain high standards of care for CPs treated with ICIs, regardless the regional prevalence of COVID-19, suggesting the adoption of similar solutions. Research on patients treated with ICIs and experiencing COVID-19 will clarify the safety profile to continue the treatments, thus informing on the most appropriate clinical conducts.

Dynamic assessment of 'valvular reserve capacity' in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis.

AIMS: Mitral stenosis (MS) may exhibit a dynamic valvular reserve. When resting gradients and systolic pulmonary pressure (sPAP) do not reflect the real severity of the disease, a dynamic evaluation becomes necessary. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical utility of exercise echocardiography in symptomatic patients with apparently subcritical MS. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and thirty consecutive patients were referred for symptomatic MS. Patients with unimpressive resting MVA (>1-1.5 cm(2)) and mean PG (≥5-9 mmHg) underwent exercise echocardiography. Cardiac performance and mitral indices (MVA, peak/mean PG, sPAP) were measured. Exhaustion of valvular reserve capacity under exercise was defined as appearance of symptoms and sPAP > 60 mmHg. Forty-six patients (35%) (age: 53 ± 10 years; 74%, female) with resting MVA (1.2 ± 0.36 cm(2)), mean PG (6.8 ± 2.7 mmHg), and sPAP (38 ± 7 mmHg) inconsistent with symptoms underwent stress echocardiography. Exercise was stopped for dyspnoea (76%) or fatigue (24%). At peak workloads (57.2 ± 21.8 Watts), increased mean PG (17.2 ± 4.8 mmHg, P< 0.001) and sPAP (67.4 ± 11.4 mmHg; P< 0.0001) were observed, without change in MVA (1.25 ± 0.4 cm(2); P= n.s.). At univariate analysis, predictors of adaptation to exercise were age (-0.345; P = 0.024), mean PG (0.339; P= 0.023), and sPAP (0.354; P= 0.024); at multivariate analysis, best predictor was resting mean PG, although correlation was poor (-0.339; P= 0.015). CONCLUSION: In MS with limiting symptoms despite unimpressive findings at rest, valvular capacity exhaustion should be tested on a dynamic background, as no single resting index can predict potential haemodynamic adaptation to exercise. In such context, the contribution of exercise echocardiography remains extremely valuable.

Annular-to-leaflet mismatch and the need for reductive annuloplasty in patients undergoing mitral repair for chronic mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse.

Annular dilation is a common feature of chronic degenerative mitral regurgitation caused by leaflet prolapse. Accordingly, patients undergoing surgical repair usually undergo concomitant reductive annuloplasty to restore a normal annular-to-leaflet relation. With the evolution of transcatheter valve repair technologies, patient selection criteria for those who do not require annuloplasty are needed. A series of patients undergoing mitral repair was analyzed, and the role of annular-to-leaflet mismatch in identifying patients requiring reductive annuloplasty was explored. Preoperative data for 82 patients undergoing mitral repair with annuloplasty for degenerative mitral regurgitation were prospectively collected, including annular intercommissural (IC) and septolateral (SL) dimensions and heights of anterior (ALH) and posterior leaflets. An SL/ALH ratio >1.4 was used to define annular-to-leaflet mismatch. After mitral repair, the ratio between preoperative IC distance and the size of the implanted annular prosthesis (Seguin ring [SR], IC/SR <1.2) was used to identify patients for whom annuloplasty was nonreductive. All patients underwent successful mitral repair. Mean preoperative IC was 46 +/- 6 mm, SL was 42 +/- 5 mm, and ALH was 31 +/- 5 mm. Mean SR was 34 +/- 3 mm, with a mean IC/SR ratio of 1.34 +/- 0.14. Sixteen patients (19%) had an IC/SR ratio <1.2. IC/SR ratio <1.2 was predicted by a SL/ALH ratio < or =1.4 (p = 0.009). In conclusion, annular dilation is negligible in <20% of surgical candidates. In this subgroup, an isolated leaflet repair may be indicated. SL/ALH ratio is a good indicator of annular-to-leaflet mismatch and could be used as an adjunct to other methods of annular function assessment to select patients for ringless mitral repair.