[Choosing the right imaging for the diagnostics and assessment of the course of peripheral nerve injuries]. / Die Wahl der richtigen Bildgebung zur Diagnostik und Verlaufsbeurteilung peripherer Nervenverletzungen.

BACKGROUND: Nerve injuries are a frequent problem in routine clinical practice and require intensive interdisciplinary care. OBJECTIVE: The current status of imaging to confirm the diagnosis of nerve injuries is described. The role of high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostics and follow-up of peripheral nerve injuries is elaborated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Review of the current state of imaging to confirm the diagnosis of nerve injuries. RESULTS: Depending on the suspected site of damage, the primary domain of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (MR neurography) is injuries in the region of the spine, nerve roots, brachial plexus and lumbar plexus, pelvis and proximal thigh. In contrast, in other peripheral nerve lesions of the extremities the advantages of high-resolution nerve ultrasound in a dynamic setting predominate. The MR neurography is indicated here, especially in the frequent bottleneck syndromes and only in very isolated and selected cases. CONCLUSION: In addition to a correct anatomical assignment, the timely decision for a possible intervention and the appropriate concomitant treatment are an important basis for a favorable prognosis of nerve injuries. Imaging techniques should therefore be used early in the diagnostics and follow-up controls of peripheral nerve injuries.

Neuromuscular ultrasound competency assessment: Consensus-based survey.

Neuromuscular ultrasound is a rapidly evolving specialty with direct application for patient care. Competency assessment is an essential standard needed to ensure quality for practitioners, particularly for those newly acquiring skills with the technique. Our aim was to survey experts' opinions regarding physician competency assessment of neuromuscular ultrasound and to identify minimal competency of knowledge and skills. The opinions of 18 experts were obtained through the Delphi method using two consecutive electronic surveys. A high degree of consensus was achieved on items regarding framework and the conduct of neuromuscular ultrasound assessment and the knowledge and skills that a candidate needs to attain minimal competency in neuromuscular ultrasound. In this study, a group of neuromuscular ultrasound experts developed a general framework for neuromuscular ultrasound competency assessment and recommended testable areas of knowledge and skills suitable for establishing minimal competency.

Ultrasound assessment of peripheral nerve pathology in neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2.

OBJECTIVE: The neurofibromatoses (NF) type 1 and 2 are hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes caused by germline mutations in the NF1 and NF2 tumor suppressor genes. In NF1 and 2, peripheral nerve tumors occur regularly. For further characterizing nerve ultrasound was performed in patients with NF1 and 2. METHODS: Patients with established diagnosis of NF1 (n=27) and NF2 (n=10) were included. Ultrasound of peripheral nerves and cervical roots was performed during routine follow-up visits. Healthy volunteers were studied for comparison. RESULTS: In patients with NF1, median cross-sectional area (CSA) of most nerves was significantly increased compared to controls and to NF2 due to generalized plexiform tumors, which arose out of multiple fascicles in 23 of 27 patients (85%). These were often accompanied by cutaneous or subcutaneous neurofibromas. In NF2, the overall aspect of peripheral nerves consisted of localized schwannomas (80%) and, apart from that, normal nerve segments. CONCLUSION: Nerve ultrasound is able to visualize different nerve pathologies in NF1 and NF2. It is a precise and inexpensive screening method for peripheral nerve manifestation in neurofibromatosis and should be considered as the first choice screening imaging modality for all peripheral nerves within reach of non-invasive ultrasound techniques. SIGNIFICANCE: Ultrasound patterns of peripheral nerve pathologies are described for the first time in a large cohort of patients with NF1 and NF2. It is a suitable screening tool and enables targeted MRI analysis.

Muscle ultrasound for early assessment of critical illness neuromyopathy in severe sepsis.

INTRODUCTION: Muscle ultrasound is emerging as a promising tool in the diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases. The current observational study evaluates the usefulness of muscle ultrasound in patients with severe sepsis for assessment of critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy (CINM) in the intensive care unit. METHODS: 28 patients with either septic shock or severe sepsis underwent clinical neurological examinations, muscle ultrasound, and nerve conduction studies on days 4 and 14 after onset of sepsis. 26 healthy controls of comparable age underwent clinical neurological evaluation and muscle ultrasound only. RESULTS: 26 of the 28 patients exhibited classic electrophysiological characteristics of CINM, and all showed typical clinical signs. Ultrasonic echogenicity of muscles was graded semiquantitatively and fasciculations were evaluated in muscles of proximal and distal arms and legs. 75% of patients showed a mean echotexture greater than 1.5, which was the maximal value found in the control group. A significant difference in mean muscle echotexture between patients and controls was found at day 4 and day 14 (both p < 0.001). In addition, from day 4 to day 14, the mean grades of muscle echotexture increased in the patient group, although the values did not reach significance levels (p = 0.085). Controls revealed the lowest number of fasciculations. In the patients group, fasciculations were detected in more muscular regions (lower and upper arm and leg) in comparison to controls (p = 0.08 at day 4 and p = 0.002 at day 14). CONCLUSIONS: Muscle ultrasound represents an easily applicable, non-invasive diagnostic tool which adds to neurophysiological testing information regarding morphological changes of muscles early in the course of sepsis. Muscle ultrasound could be useful for screening purposes prior to subjecting patients to more invasive techniques such as electromyography and/or muscle biopsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS-ID: DRKS00000642.