Coronary artery assessment in Kawasaki disease with dual-source CT angiography to uncover vascular pathology.

BACKGROUND: Kawasaki disease (KD) is a vasculitis with formation of coronary artery aneurysms (CAAs) that can lead to myocardial ischemia. Echocardiography is the primary imaging modality for the coronary arteries despite limited visualization. Coronary angiography (CAG) is the gold standard yet invasive with high-radiation exposure. To date however, state-of-the-art CT scanners enable high-quality low-dose coronary computed tomographic angiography (cCTA) imaging. The aim of our study in KD is to report (i) the diagnostic yield of cCTA compared to echocardiography, and (ii) the radiation dose. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected data of KD patients who underwent cCTA. cCTA findings were compared with echocardiography results. In 70 KD patients (median age 15.1 years [0.5-59.5 years]; 78% male; 38% giant CAA), the cCTA identified 61 CAAs, of which 34 (56%, with a Z score > 3, in 22 patients) were not detected by echocardiography. In addition, the left circumflex (aneurysmatic in 6 patients) was always visible upon cCTA and not detected upon echocardiography. Calcifications, plaques, and/or thrombi were visualized by cCTA in 25 coronary arteries (15 patients). Calcifications were seen as early as 2.7 years after onset of disease. In 5 patients, the cCTA findings resulted in an immediate change of treatment. The median effective dose (ED) in millisievert differed significantly (p < 0.01) between third-generation dual-source and other CT scanners (1.5 [0.3-9.4] (n = 56) vs 3.8 [1.7-20.0] (n = 14)). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield of third-generation dual-source cCTA combined with reduced radiation exposure makes cCTA a favorable diagnostic modality to complete the diagnosis and long-term treatment indications for KD. KEY POINTS: • cCTA is a favorable diagnostic modality to complete the diagnosis and long-term treatment indications for Kawasaki disease. • Kawasaki disease patients with proven coronary artery involvement on echocardiography require additional imaging.

Mobile health in adults with congenital heart disease: current use and future needs.

OBJECTIVE: Many adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are affected lifelong by cardiac events, particularly arrhythmias and heart failure. Despite the care provided, the cardiac event rate remains high. Mobile health (mHealth) brings opportunities to enhance daily monitoring and hence timely response in an attempt to improve outcome. However, it is not known if adults with CHD are currently using mHealth and what type of mHealth they may need in the near future. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with CHD who visited the outpatient clinic at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam were asked to fill out questionnaires. Exclusion criteria for this study were mental impairment or inability to read and write Dutch. RESULTS: All 118 patients participated (median age 40 (range 18-78) years, 40 % male, 49 % symptomatic) and 92 % owned a smartphone. Whereas only a small minority (14 %) of patients used mHealth, the large majority (75 %) were willing to start. Most patients wanted to use mHealth in order to receive more information on physical health, and advice on progression of symptoms or signs of deterioration. Analyses on age, gender and complexity of defect showed significantly less current smartphone usage at older age, but no difference in interest or preferences in type of mHealth application for the near future. CONCLUSION: The relatively young adult CHD population only rarely uses mHealth, but the majority are motivated to start using mHealth. New mHealth initiatives are required in these patients with a chronic condition who need lifelong surveillance in order to reveal if a reduction in morbidity and mortality and improvement in quality of life can be achieved.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the main pulmonary artery: reliable assessment of dimensions in Marfan patients on a simple axial spin echo image.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if a simple axial spin echo (SE) image can be used for reliable assessment of pulmonary artery dimensions in patients with Marfan syndrome. METHODS: Fifty Marfan patients (mean age 33 +/- 10 years; 34 men, 16 women) and 15 normal subjects (mean age 28 +/- 4 years; nine men, six women) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Pulmonary artery dimensions were obtained on axial SE images at two different levels: (1) the level of the pulmonary artery root, and (2) the level of the pulmonary artery bifurcation. To evaluate the accuracy of axial plane measurements 10 Marfan patients also underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). RESULTS: In the 10 Marfan patients who also underwent CE-MRA, the mean diameter at the pulmonary bifurcation assessed with CE-MRA (31.5 +/- 3.6 mm) was almost equal to mean diameter assessed with axial SE (30.7 +/- 3.6 mm). Agreement of methodology according to Bland and Altman analysis showed a 95% confidence interval ranging from -2.6 to + 4.4 mm for all distances of the pulmonary artery root. In Marfan patients the mean right-left diameter measured on both axial SE images and CE-MRA was approximately 2.5 mm larger than the anterior-right and anterior-left diameters (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Axial SE MRI is a reliable and easy acquisition to measure pulmonary artery dimensions in patients with Marfan syndrome, and could be used for follow-up, especially in patients with severe involvement of the cardiovascular system. Not only the pulmonary artery trunk but also the asymmetric pulmonary root should be measured, although the clinical relevance of the asymmetric root is not yet known.

Quantitative assessment of dural ectasia as a marker for Marfan syndrome.

PURPOSE: To establish normal values for lumbosacral dural sac dimensions with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and to use these values to assess the sensitivity and specificity of dural ectasia as a marker for Marfan syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging was performed to measure dural sac diameter (DSD) from L1 through S1 in 44 adult patients with Marfan syndrome and in 44 matched control subjects. DSD values were corrected for vertebral body size, yielding dural sac ratios (DSRs). The control subjects served to establish the upper limit of normal DSR values at the L1 through S1 levels. RESULTS: Cutoff values for normal DSRs for L1 through S1 were 0.64, 0.55, 0.47, 0.48, 0.48, and 0.57. Significant DSR differences were shown at all levels between patients with Marfan syndrome and control subjects (P <.001 at all levels). At L1 through S1, the sensitivity of dural ectasia as a marker for Marfan syndrome was 45%-77%, and the specificity was 95% or greater. By combining levels L3 and S1, dural ectasia as a marker for Marfan syndrome yielded a sensitivity of 95% (42 of 44 patients) and a specificity of 98% (43 of 44). The presence of dural ectasia excelled, compared with the presence of other Marfan syndrome manifestations in the patient population. CONCLUSION: Abnormal DSR values at L3 or S1 can be used to identify Marfan syndrome with 95% sensitivity and 98% specificity.