Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management.

Use of organs from donors testing positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) may safely expand the donor pool. The American Society of Transplantation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the existing literature and developed consensus recommendations for recipient management following the use of organs from HBV positive donors. Transmission risk is highest with liver donors and significantly lower with non-liver (kidney and thoracic) donors. Antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduces the rate of transmission to liver recipients from isolated HBV core antibody positive (anti-HBc+) donors. Organs from anti-HBc+ donors should be considered for all adult transplant candidates after an individualized assessment of the risks and benefits and appropriate patient consent. Indefinite antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in liver recipients with no immunity or vaccine immunity but not in liver recipients with natural immunity. Antiviral prophylaxis may be considered for up to 1 year in susceptible non-liver recipients but is not recommended in immune non-liver recipients. Although no longer the treatment of choice in patients with chronic HBV, lamivudine remains the most cost-effective choice for prophylaxis in this setting. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin is not recommended.

West Nile virus: the Italian national transplant network reaction to an alert in the north-eastern region, Italy 2011.

We report four cases of West Nile virus (WNV) transmission following a single multiorgan donation in north-eastern Italy. The transmissions were promptly detected by local transplant centres. The donor had been tested for WNV by nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) prior to transplantation and was negative. There were no detected errors in the nationally implemented WNV safety protocols.

Cytomegalovirus PP65 antigenemia monitoring as a guide for preemptive therapy: a cost effective strategy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in adult liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in adult liver transplant recipients, using routine preemptive therapy guided by the pp65 antigenemia test. METHODS: Antigenemia was monitored weekly after liver transplantation (OLTX) for the first 3 months, and once a month for another 3 months. CMV seronegative recipients were treated preemptively for the first positive antigenemia. Seropositive recipients were treated only when their antigenemia count reached a threshold of > or =100 positive cells per 200,000 leukocytes. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included between June 1994 and April 1995, of which 137 (95%) were primary OLTX. The percentage of positive antigenemia and CMV disease was 55 and 8%, respectively. Seventy-eight (54%) patients were protocol-monitored for the entire follow-up (group 1) and received appropriate preemptive therapy, although 66 (46%) patients had protocol violation by having missed blood samples or blood drawn at unscheduled times (group 2). Using Cox's proportional hazards model, patients with a first antigenemia count of >11 leukocytes had a significantly higher rate of CMV disease compared to patients with an antigenemia count < or =11 leukocytes (RR = 7.3, 95% confidence interval = 2.2 to 24.5). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjustments were made to control for: group 1 versus group 2, use of OKT3, and serology risk categories. This analysis showed that the relative rate of CMV disease was still significantly higher among patients with antigenemia count >11 leukocytes (adjusted RR = 4.9, 95% confidence interval = 1.3 to 18.1). The estimated cost of preemptive therapy was less than that of prophylaxis with i.v. (14-day course) or oral (90-day course) ganciclovir. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive therapy guided by pp65 antigenemia is a useful and cost effective strategy for prevention of CMV disease.

[The general practitioner and clinical records: a survey of the knowledge of users of a software package]. / Medico di base e cartelle cliniche: indagine conoscitiva su utenti in possesso di un pacchetto software.

The FATMA project--subproject 6, Line of Research 2--aims at implementing a new computerized information network for general practitioners using the same kind of software and homogeneously located throughout Italy. Thus, patients' case form data can be collected for public health purposes. After a study of literature in order to check whether other countries had implemented similar projects and what they consisted of, a survey based on a computerized questionnaire was carried out on a group of g.p.s. who had already received a software for the management of their clinical and professional activities from Janssen Informedica. This survey aimed at judging some aspects of users in order to select potential monitors of the information network who would test a new software. The analysis regards both g.p.s' social and professional data and the use of a computer package with reference to the quality and quantity of the clinical data they input. 2,010 questionnaires were filled in all their parts and mailed back to Informedica. It came out that g.p.s. believe more and more they can improve the organization and management of their work by using a software equipped with routines and easy access procedures so that clinical data, diagnostic reports and treatment can be collected, placed on files and updated. Thus, a new software should be developed. While meeting g.p.s' needs, it must overcome the limits of packages now available concerning the possibility of carrying out epidemiological studies. The software can become a tool to collect clinical data of patients, diseases and diagnostic procedures through standard protocols directly from g.p.s records.