Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Diabetes Care ; 42(6): 1147-1154, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30728224

RESUMO

Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors are new oral antidiabetes medications shown to effectively reduce glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and glycemic variability, blood pressure, and body weight without intrinsic properties to cause hypoglycemia in people with type 1 diabetes. However, recent studies, particularly in individuals with type 1 diabetes, have demonstrated increases in the absolute risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Some cases presented with near-normal blood glucose levels or mild hyperglycemia, complicating the recognition/diagnosis of DKA and potentially delaying treatment. Several SGLT inhibitors are currently under review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European regulatory agencies as adjuncts to insulin therapy in people with type 1 diabetes. Strategies must be developed and disseminated to the medical community to mitigate the associated DKA risk. This Consensus Report reviews current data regarding SGLT inhibitor use and provides recommendations to enhance the safety of SGLT inhibitors in people with type 1 diabetes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Cetoacidose Diabética , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose , Consenso , Glucose , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes , Gestão de Riscos , Sódio
2.
Diabetes Care ; 41(11): 2275-2280, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30224348

RESUMO

While A1C is well established as an important risk marker for diabetes complications, with the increasing use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to help facilitate safe and effective diabetes management, it is important to understand how CGM metrics, such as mean glucose, and A1C correlate. Estimated A1C (eA1C) is a measure converting the mean glucose from CGM or self-monitored blood glucose readings, using a formula derived from glucose readings from a population of individuals, into an estimate of a simultaneously measured laboratory A1C. Many patients and clinicians find the eA1C to be a helpful educational tool, but others are often confused or even frustrated if the eA1C and laboratory-measured A1C do not agree. In the U.S., the Food and Drug Administration determined that the nomenclature of eA1C needed to change. This led the authors to work toward a multipart solution to facilitate the retention of such a metric, which includes renaming the eA1C the glucose management indicator (GMI) and generating a new formula for converting CGM-derived mean glucose to GMI based on recent clinical trials using the most accurate CGM systems available. The final aspect of ensuring a smooth transition from the old eA1C to the new GMI is providing new CGM analyses and explanations to further understand how to interpret GMI and use it most effectively in clinical practice. This Perspective will address why a new name for eA1C was needed, why GMI was selected as the new name, how GMI is calculated, and how to understand and explain GMI if one chooses to use GMI as a tool in diabetes education or management.


Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus/sangue , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Terminologia como Assunto , Glicemia/metabolismo , Automonitorização da Glicemia/classificação , Automonitorização da Glicemia/instrumentação , Automonitorização da Glicemia/métodos , Educação em Saúde , Humanos , Estatística como Assunto/instrumentação , Estatística como Assunto/métodos
3.
Endocr Pract ; 24(7): 634-645, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29848066

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of the C-peptide and beta-cell autoantibody testing required by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on costs/utilization for patients with diabetes mellitus initiating continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study used propensity score-matched patients. Analysis 1 compared patients 1-year pre- and 2-years post-CSII adoption who met or did not meet CMS criteria. Analysis 2 compared Medicare Advantage patients using CSII or multiple daily injections (MDI) who did not meet CMS criteria for 1-year pre- and 1-year post-CSII adoption. Analysis 3 extended analysis 2 to 2 years postindex and also included a subset of patients ≥55 years old but not yet in Medicare Advantage. RESULTS: Analysis 1 resulted in significantly slower growth in hospital admissions ( P = .0453) in CSII-treated patients who did not meet the criteria. Analyses 2 and 3 showed numerically slower growth in inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) costs for CSII versus MDI patients (both not meeting criteria). Analysis 3 showed significantly slower growth in ED costs and hospital admissions for CSII versus MDI Medicare Advantage patients before propensity matching (both P<.05). In patients ≥55 years old, ED costs grew more slowly for CSII than MDI therapy ( P = .0678). CONCLUSION: Numerically slower growth in hospital admissions was seen for pump adopters who did not meet CMS C-peptide criteria, while medical costs growth was similar. For CSII users who did not meet the CMS criteria, numerically slower growth in inpatient, outpatient, ED costs, and hospital admissions occurred versus MDI. ABBREVIATIONS: CMS = Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services; CSII = continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; DM = diabetes mellitus; DME = durable medical equipment; ED = emergency department; MDI = multiple daily injections (of insulin).


Assuntos
Peptídeo C/análise , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes , Injeções Subcutâneas , Insulina , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
Endocr Pract ; 23(4): 479-497, 2017 Apr 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28156151

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The development of these guidelines is mandated by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Board of Directors and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) Board of Trustees and adheres with published AACE protocols for the standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). METHODS: Each Recommendation is based on a diligent review of the clinical evidence with transparent incorporation of subjective factors. RESULTS: The Executive Summary of this document contains 87 Recommendations of which 45 are Grade A (51.7%), 18 are Grade B (20.7%), 15 are Grade C (17.2%), and 9 (10.3%) are Grade D. These detailed, evidence-based recommendations allow for nuance-based clinical decision making that addresses multiple aspects of real-world medical care. The evidence base presented in the subsequent Appendix provides relevant supporting information for Executive Summary Recommendations. This update contains 695 citations of which 202 (29.1 %) are evidence level (EL) 1 (strong), 137 (19.7%) are EL 2 (intermediate), 119 (17.1%) are EL 3 (weak), and 237 (34.1%) are EL 4 (no clinical evidence). CONCLUSION: This CPG is a practical tool that endocrinologists, other healthcare professionals, regulatory bodies and health-related organizations can use to reduce the risks and consequences of dyslipidemia. It provides guidance on screening, risk assessment, and treatment recommendations for a range of patients with various lipid disorders. These recommendations emphasize the importance of treating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in some individuals to lower goals than previously recommended and support the measurement of coronary artery calcium scores and inflammatory markers to help stratify risk. Special consideration is given to patients with diabetes, familial hypercholesterolemia, women, and pediatric patients with dyslipidemia. Both clinical and cost-effectiveness data are provided to support treatment decisions. ABBREVIATIONS: A1C = hemoglobin A1C ACE = American College of Endocrinology ACS = acute coronary syndrome AHA = American Heart Association ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ATP = Adult Treatment Panel apo = apolipoprotein BEL = best evidence level CKD = chronic kidney disease CPG = clinical practice guidelines CVA = cerebrovascular accident EL = evidence level FH = familial hypercholesterolemia HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HeFH = heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia HIV = human immunodeficiency virus HoFH = homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Lp-PLA2 = lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 MESA = Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis MetS = metabolic syndrome MI = myocardial infarction NCEP = National Cholesterol Education Program PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome PCSK9 = proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus TG = triglycerides VLDL-C = very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Dislipidemias/terapia , Endocrinologia/normas , Prevenção Primária/normas , Adulto , Doenças Cardiovasculares/economia , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Endócrino/economia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Endócrino/normas , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/economia , Endocrinologistas/organização & administração , Endocrinologistas/normas , Endocrinologia/organização & administração , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Prevenção Primária/economia , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Estados Unidos
5.
Endocr Pract ; 21(5): 522-33, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25962091

RESUMO

This document represents the official position of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology. Where there were no randomized controlled trials or specific U.S. FDA labeling for issues in clinical practice, the participating clinical experts utilized their judgment and experience. Every effort was made to achieve consensus among the committee members. Position statements are meant to provide guidance, but they are not to be considered prescriptive for any individual patient and cannot replace the judgment of a clinician.


Assuntos
Automonitorização da Glicemia , Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Endocrinologia , Automonitorização da Glicemia/instrumentação , Automonitorização da Glicemia/métodos , Consenso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Hipoglicemia/sangue , Hipoglicemia/prevenção & controle , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação como Assunto , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Sociedades Médicas , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA