[Costs of potentially outpatient endoscopic procedures in cases with a 1-day hospital stay versus a longer stay]. / Kosten potenziell ambulant erbringbarer endoskopischer Leistungen in Fällen mit 1-Tages-Verweildauer gegenüber einer längeren Verweildauer.

INTRODUCTION: The transfer of patient care and medical interventions that was previously provided on an inpatient basis to outpatient settings is a stated goal of health politics. It is unclear to what extent costs of an endoscopic procedure and the disease severity depend on the duration of inpatient treatment. We therefore examined whether endoscopic services for cases with a one-day length of stay (VWD) are comparably expensive to cases with a longer VWD. METHODS: Outpatient services were selected from the DGVS service catalog. Day cases with exactly one such gastroenterological endoscopic (GAEN) service were compared with cases with VWD>1 day regarding their patient clinical complexity levels (PCCL) and mean costs. Data from the DGVS-DRG project with §21-KHEntgG cost data from a total of 57 hospitals from 2018 and 2019 served as the basis. Endoscopic costs were taken from cost center group 8 of the InEK cost matrix and plausibility checked. RESULTS: A total of 122,514 cases with exactly one GAEN service were identified. Statistically equal costs were shown in 30 of 47 service groups. In 10 groups, the cost difference was not relevant (<10%). Cost differences >10% existed only for EGD with variceal therapy, insertion of a self-expanding prosthesis, dilatation/bougienage/exchange with PTC/PTCD in place, non-extensive ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and colonoscopy with submucosal or full thickness resection, or foreign object removal. PCCL differed in all but one group. CONCLUSION: Gastroenterology endoscopy services provided as part of inpatient care but potentially performable on an outpatient basis are predominantly equally expensive for day cases as for patients with a length of stay greater than one day. The disease severity is lower. Calculated §21-KHEntgG cost data thus form a reliable basis for the calculation of appropriate reimbursement for hospital services to be provided as outpatient services under the AOP in the future.

[Prognostic significance and economic burden of hepatic encephalopathy in liver cirrhosis in German hospitals based on G-DRG data]. / Mortalität und ökonomische Auswirkungen der hepatischen Enzephalopathie bei Leberzirrhose in deutschen Krankenhäusern auf der Basis von G-DRG-Kostendaten.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) represents a frequent complication of liver cirrhosis with negative effects on patients' lives. The prevalence of clinical HE is estimated to be between 30-45 %. Regardless of its clinical and prognostic relevance HE is considered to be underdiagnosed. METHODS: Beyond a systematic analysis of mortality of HE, we investigated the economic impact and reimbursement situation for HE in patients with liver cirrhosis in Germany. For the retrospective analysis, anonymized data (2011-2015) concerning expenses and diagnoses (§â€Š21-4 KHEntgG) were obtained from 74 participating hospitals of the Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) Project of the German Gastroenterological Association (DGVS). Furthermore, results were compared with case data from all German hospitals provided by the German Federal Authority on Statistics (Statistische Bundesamt (Destatis), Wiesbaden). RESULTS: In participating hospitals 59 093 cases with liver cirrhosis were identified of which 14.6 % were coded as having HE. Hospital mortality was threefold increased compared to cirrhosis-patients without HE (20.9 versus 7.5 %). Cases with cirrhosis as well as the proportion with HE increased over time. Compared to all patients with cirrhosis, reimbursement for HE patients produced a deficit (of up to 634 € for HE grade 4). DISCUSSION: Mortality is threefold increased in patients with cirrhosis when an additional HE is diagnosed. Hospitals participating in the DGVS-DRG-project coded 2 % more HE cases among their cirrhosis cases than the rest of hospitals either because of a selection bias for greater disease severity or because of better coding quality. At present, reimbursement for HE patients on the basis of F-DRG-system produced a deficit.

[Cost assessment for endoscopic procedures in the German diagnosis-related-group (DRG) system - 5 year cost data analysis of the German Society of Gastroenterology project]. / Kosten endoskopischer Leistungen der Gastroenterologie im deutschen DRG-System ­ 5-Jahres-Kostendatenanalyse des DGVS-Projekts.

Background In the German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) endoscopic procedures are listed in cost center 8. For reimbursement between hospital departments and external providers outdated or incomplete catalogues (e. g. DKG-NT, GOÄ) have remained in use. We have assessed the cost for endoscopic procedures in the G-DRG-system. Methods To assess the cost of endoscopic procedures 74 hospitals, annual providers of cost-data to the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) made their data (2011 - 2015; §â€Š21 KHEntgG) available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS) in anonymized form (4873 809 case-data-sets). Using cases with exactly one endoscopic procedure (n = 274 186) average costs over 5 years were calculated for 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers. Results Robust mean endoscopy costs ranged from 230.56 € for gastroscopy (144 666 cases), 276.23 € (n = 32 294) for a simple colonoscopy, to 844.07 € (n = 10 150) for ERCP with papillotomy and plastic stent insertion and 1602.37 € (n = 967) for ERCP with a self-expanding metal stent. Higher costs, specifically for complex procedures, were identified for University Hospitals. Discussion For the first time this catalogue for endoscopic procedure-tiers, based on §â€Š21 KHEntgG data-sets from 74 InEK-calculating hospitals, permits a realistic assessment of endoscopy costs in German hospitals. The higher costs in university hospitals are likely due to referral bias for complex cases and emergency interventions. For 46 endoscopic procedure-tiers an objective cost-allocation within the G-DRG system is now possible. By international comparison the costs of endoscopic procedures in Germany are low, due to either greater efficiency, lower personnel allocation or incomplete documentation of the real expenses.

Self assessment of warning symptoms in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol addicted patients are at increased risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Delay to endoscopy is mainly determined by patients' self assessment. METHODS: The authors asked 417 patients with high alcohol consumption from Leipzig (n = 277) and Munich (n = 140) with an average alcohol consumption of 660 g/week about their behavior when faced with symptoms of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. RESULTS: 71% or 51% said they would call the emergency physician if they were to vomit blood or black liquid. Only 32% would call emergency medical aid if they were to pass black stools, and only 25% of those surveyed thought urgent medical attention necessary in any of the three scenarios. Patients with regular contact with health care providers, and women, were more likely to consider these three scenarios as medical emergencies. The authors found no differences by age, educational level, marital status and alcohol consumption. DISCUSSION: Knowledge concerning the impact of symptoms of gastrointestinal bleeding was poor, in our study. Patients with high alcohol consumption and infrequent contact with health care providers, in particular, should be informed about symptoms such as melena and hematemesis, as delayed presentation significantly affects prognosis and resource consumption.