A comprehensive analysis of patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformation with headache: assessment of risk factors and treatment effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Due to the high mortality and disability rate of intracranial hemorrhage, headache is not the main focus of research on cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM), so research on headaches in AVM is still scarce, and the clinical understanding is shallow. This study aims to delineate the risk factors associated with headaches in AVM and to compare the effectiveness of various intervention treatments versus conservative treatment in alleviating headache symptoms. METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of AVMs who were treated in our institution from August 2011 to December 2021. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was employed to assess the risk factors for headaches in AVMs with unruptured, non-epileptic. Additionally, the effectiveness of different intervention treatments compared to conservative management in alleviating headaches was evaluated through propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 946 patients were included in the analysis of risk factors for headaches. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that female (OR 1.532, 95% CI 1.173-2.001, p = 0.002), supply artery dilatation (OR 1.423, 95% CI 1.082-1.872, p = 0.012), and occipital lobe (OR 1.785, 95% CI 1.307-2.439, p < 0.001) as independent risk factors for the occurrence of headaches. There were 443 AVMs with headache symptoms. After propensity score matching, the microsurgery group (OR 7.27, 95% CI 2.82-18.7 p < 0.001), stereotactic radiosurgery group(OR 9.46, 95% CI 2.26-39.6, p = 0.002), and multimodality treatment group (OR 8.34 95% CI 2.87-24.3, p < 0.001) demonstrate significant headache relief compared to the conservative group. However, there was no significant difference between the embolization group (OR 2.24 95% CI 0.88-5.69, p = 0.091) and the conservative group. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified potential risk factors for headaches in AVMs and found that microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and multimodal therapy had significant benefits in headache relief compared to conservative treatment. These findings provide important guidance for clinicians when developing treatment options that can help improve overall treatment outcomes and quality of life for patients.

A Meta-analysis: Cost Comparison of Flow Diversion and Coil Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysm.

Background: Intracranial aneurysm serves as a prevalent cerebral disorder leading to the low-quality life and financial burden of the patients. Flow diversion and coil embolization have been confirmed as common therapeutic strategies for intracranial aneurysms. In this work, we identified and compared the cost between the flow diversion and coil embolization in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in a meta-analysis. Methods: We downloaded literatures that are published before Feb 2021 from Cochrane Library, Embase, and Pubmed using terms including "flow diversion", "pipeline embolization device", "coil embolization", "coiling", "Intracranial aneurysms", and "Cerebral aneurysms". The data were analyzed by STATA 15.1. Differences in treatment costs were determined by WMD (95% CI). Results: A total of 1332 articles were included in the search of the limited terms, and 8 were selected after eliminating duplicate and unwanted studies. Our data indicated that the total cost of flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms is significantly lower than coil embolization (WMD = -4419.12, 95% CI: -6292.21 to -2546.03, p ≤ 0.001). In addition, we explored the retreatment hospitalization cost of flow diversion and coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms. We found that the retreatment hospitalization cost of flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms is significantly higher than coil embolization (WMD = 3203.85, 95% CI: 1904.60 to 4503.10, p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: We concluded that the total cost was lower, and the retreatment hospitalization costs of flow diversion were higher than coil embolization for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Our finding provides valuable insights into the application of flow diversion and coil embolization in intracranial aneurysm therapy. Flow diversion may be applied as a major treatment with the consideration of retreatment.