Validity of Montreal Cognitive Assessment to Detect Cognitive Impairment in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Guidelines recommend screening older people (> 60-65 years) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) for cognitive impairment, as it has implications in the management of diabetes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a sensitive test for the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the general population, but its validity in T2D has not been established. METHODS: We administered MoCA to patients with T2D (age ≥ 60 years) and controls (no T2D), along with a culturally validated neuropsychological battery and functional activity questionnaire. MCI was defined as performance in one or more cognitive domains ≥ 1.0 SD below the control group (on two tests representing a cognitive domain), with preserved functional activities. The discriminant validity of MoCA for the diagnosis of MCI at different cut-offs was ascertained. RESULTS: We enrolled 267 patients with T2D and 120 controls; 39% of the participants with T2D met the diagnostic criteria for MCI on detailed neuropsychological testing. At the recommended cut-off on MoCA (< 26), the sensitivity (94.2%) was high, but the specificity was quite low (29.5%). The cut-off score of < 23 showed an optimal trade-off between sensitivity (69.2%), specificity (71.8%), and diagnostic accuracy (70.8%). The cut-off of < 21 exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy (74.9%) with an excellent specificity (91.4%), a good positive and negative predictive value (78.5% and 73.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended screening cut-off point on MoCA of < 26 has a suboptimal specificity and may increase the referral burden in memory clinics. A lower cut-off of < 21 on MoCA maximizes the diagnostic accuracy. Interactive Visual Abstract available for this article.

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a risk factor for cognitive dysfunction which potentially impacts diabetes self-management skills. Guidelines recommend screening older adults with diabetes for early detection of cognitive impairment. For screening cognitive impairment in busy endocrine clinics, we need a test that is easy and rapid to administer, sensitive enough to pick the cognitive deficits of T2D and at the same time gives less false-positive outcomes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scale is a widely available cognitive screening tool, but there are no studies evaluating its discriminant properties in people with diabetes. We evaluated the performance metrics of MoCA in this population. We found mild cognitive impairment in four out of ten participants with T2D at or above 60 years of age. At the recommended cut-off on MoCA (< 26), the sensitivity was high, but the specificity quite low. We found better diagnostic accuracy at lower cut-offs (20/21), with high specificity but a lower sensitivity. At this cut-off, approximately one out of five people screened using MoCA would require detailed neuropsychological testing, and four out of five who undergo detailed evaluation would have true cognitive impairment.

Video Teleconference Administration of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-III for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: An Experience in Indian Subjects with Cognitive Dysfunction.

Objective: To determine the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability of video teleconference (VTC)-based neuropsychological assessment using Addenbrooke's cognitive examination-III (ACE-III). Methods: This study was performed from January 2022 to April 2022, during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India. We administered ACE-III using video-teleconferencing and compared the scores to face-to-face (FTF) testing for the eligible participants. We also conducted a participant's satisfaction survey of VTC-administered ACE-III compared to FTF-administered ACE-III, using a 7-point Likert scale. Results: We screened 37 participants and 24 (64.9%) successfully underwent ACE-III testing through VTC. We included 20 patients (mean age: 62.7 ± 10 years, mean education: 12.0 ± 4.6 years, 85% men) for final analysis, (who completed both VTC and FTF-administered ACE-III). Nine patients had major neurocognitive disorder (dementia), eight had mild neurocognitive disorder (MCI), and three had subjective cognitive decline (SCD). The two tests were administered at a median gap of 36 (18,74.5) days. The Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of ACE-3 total scores (0.97) and the subdomain scores was high (>0.8). There was "very low" to "no" bias on the Bland-Altman plots, across all domains. The mean overall satisfaction score was 4.1, indicating that VTC is "as good as" FTF. Conclusions: Results support the feasibility and acceptability of remote administration of ACE-III via VTC. There is a good agreement between the ACE-III scores across VTC and in-person conditions.

Suboptimal adherence to prescribed daily growth hormone regimen among medicaid beneficiaries in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to describe the adherence and discontinuation patterns of somatropin over 3 years among children with pGHD insured by Medicaid across the United States. METHODS: Eligible children were aged ≥3 and <16 years with Medicaid coverage, diagnosed with pGHD, and had ≥2 new prescriptions for somatropin between 1 July 2014 and 31 December 2018. Four non-exclusive patient cohorts were constructed (≥3, 12, 24, and 36 months of continuous enrollment after initial prescription). Suboptimal adherence was defined as medication possession ratio <0.80, and discontinuation as a gap of >60 days between somatropin fills. Logistic and proportional hazards regression methods were used to estimate odds of suboptimal adherence and time to discontinuation, respectively. RESULTS: In the 12-month cohort (n = 3623), mean age was 10.5 ± 3.2 years, 70.8% were male, 44.4% White, 29.1% Hispanic, 7.1% Black, and 1.7% Asian. At months 12, 24, and 36, the proportion with suboptimal adherence was 40.9, 50.4, 54.4%, respectively, and 49.2% of patients with ≥3 months of follow-up discontinued therapy. At 12 months, lower age and race/ethnicity (Black vs. White referent) had greater odds of suboptimal adherence. Discontinuation was associated with Black (vs. White referent) race and geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic characteristics may be risk factors for suboptimal adherence and/or discontinuation of prescribed somatropin therapy. Improving GH regimen adherence among this at-risk population, and specifically among subgroups at highest risk, is warranted to improve clinical outcomes.

Assessment of Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection for Dystonic Hand Tremor: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: There is an unmet need for safe and efficacious treatments for upper-extremity dystonic tremor (DT). To date, only uncontrolled retrospective case series have reported the effect of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections on upper-extremity DT. Objective: To assess the effect of BoNT injections on tremor in patients with upper-extremity DT. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this placebo-controlled, parallel-group randomized clinical trial, 30 adult patients with upper-extremity DT treated at a movement disorder clinic in a tertiary care university hospital were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to BoNT or saline injection, 0.9%, using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Randomization was masked using opaque envelopes. The participant, injector, outcome assessor, and statistician were blinded to the randomization. Participants were recruited between November 20, 2018, and December 12, 2019, and the last follow-up was completed in March 2020. Interventions: Participants received electromyographically guided intramuscular injections of BoNT or placebo into the tremulous muscles of the upper extremity. Injection patterns and doses were individualized according to tremor phenomenologic findings. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the total score on the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale 6 weeks after the intervention. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. All patients were offered open-label BoNT injections after 12 weeks and reassessed 6 weeks later. Results: A total of 48 adult patients with a diagnosis of brachial dystonia with DT were screened. Fifteen were ineligible and 3 refused consent; therefore, 30 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.0 [18.6] years; 26 [86.7%] male) were recruited, with 15 randomized to receive BoNT and 15 to receive placebo. In the intention-to-treat group, the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale total score was significantly lower in the BoNT group at 6 weeks (adjusted mean difference, -10.9; 95% CI, -15.4 to -6.5; P < .001) and 12 weeks (adjusted mean difference, -5.7; 95% CI, -11.0 to -0.5; P = .03). More participants in the BoNT group reported global improvement on the Global Impression of Change (PGIC) assessment (PGIC 1, 2, and 3: BoNT: 4 [26.7%], 6 [40.0%], and 5 [33.3%]; placebo: 5 [33.3%], 10 [66.7%], and 0, respectively; P = .047). Subjective hand weakness (BoNT: 6 [40.0%]; placebo: 4 [28.6%], P = .52) and dynamometer-assessed grip strength (mean difference, -0.2 log10[kgf/m2]2/Hz-Hz; 95% CI, -0.9 to 0.4 log10[kgf/m2]2/Hz-Hz; P = .45) were similar in both groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, botulinum neurotoxin injections were superior to placebo in reducing tremor severity in upper-extremity DT. An individualized approach to muscle selection and dosing was beneficial without unacceptable adverse effects. Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry of India (http://ctri.nic.in) Identifier: CTRI/2018/02/011721.

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost Evaluation of the Topical Luliconazole Therapy versus Topical Clotrimazole Therapy in Patients with Localized Dermatophytosis in a Tertiary Care Hospital: An Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Dermatophytosis is a superficial fungal infection that has high affinity for keratinized tissues of the body. The treatment of localized dermatophytosis is a major concern for the dermatologist especially in tropical countries like India. Various topical antifungals are available for the treatment of localized uncomplicated dermatophytosis. Luliconazole is an azole antifungal available that has potent activity against dermatophytes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare two treatment modalities for the treatment of localized dermatophytosis in terms of efficacy, safety, and cost evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective and observational study carried out for 6 months and included 200 patients (luliconazole group [n = 94] and clotrimazole group [n = 106]). Patients were followed up for 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Outcome parameters such as pruritis, erythema, scaling, vesiculations, and global assessment score were noted at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the assessment of efficacy. The statistical analysis was done using Chi-square and Student's t-test. RESULTS: Luliconazole and clotrimazole showed 56.38% and 23.58% cure rate at the end of two weeks respectively (P < 0.05). At the end of treatment, the cure rates were 98.93% and 95.28% in luliconazole and clotrimazole, respectively (P > 0.005). Both the drugs were equally safe. On cost-effective analysis, luliconazole was found to be more cost-effective than clotrimazole at the end of 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Therapeutic efficacy of luliconazole was more as significant proportion of patients achieved complete clearance of lesions at faster rate within 2 weeks with convenient once daily application.

Hospital Resource Utilization and Costs Associated With Warfarin Versus Apixaban Treatment Among Patients Hospitalized for Venous Thromboembolism in the United States.

A real-world US database analysis was conducted to evaluate the hospital resource utilization and costs of patients hospitalized for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated with warfarin versus apixaban. Additionally, 1-month readmissions were evaluated. Of 28 612 patients with VTE identified from the Premier Hospital database (August 2014-May 2016), 91% (N = 26 088) received warfarin and 9% (N = 2524) received apixaban. Outcomes were assessed after controlling for key patient/hospital characteristics. For index hospitalizations, the average length of stay (LOS) was longer (3.8 vs 3.1 days, P < .001; difference: 0.7 days) and mean hospitalization cost higher (US$3224 vs US$2,740, P < .001; difference: US$484) for warfarin versus apixaban-treated patients. During the 1-month follow-up period, warfarin treatment was associated with a greater risk of all-cause readmission (odds ratio [OR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.48, P = .003), major bleeding (MB)-related readmission (OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.03-4.27, P = .04), and any bleeding-related readmission (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.09-2.56, P = .02) versus apixaban. The results of this real-world analysis show that compared to warfarin, apixaban treatment was associated with shorter index hospital stays, lower index hospitalization costs, and reduced risk of MB-related readmissions among hospitalized patients with VTE.

The economic impact of quarantine: SARS in Toronto as a case study.

OBJECTIVES: Over time, quarantine has become a classic public health intervention and has been used repeatedly when newly emerging infectious diseases have threatened to spread throughout a population. Here, we weigh the economic costs and benefits associated with implementing widespread quarantine in Toronto during the SARS outbreaks of 2003. METHODS: We compared the costs of two outbreak scenarios: in Scenario A, SARS is able to transmit itself throughout a population without any significant public health interventions. In Scenario B, quarantine is implemented early on in an attempt to contain the virus. By evaluating these situations, we can investigate whether or not the use of quarantine is justified by being either cost-saving, life saving, or both. RESULTS: Our results indicate that quarantine is effective in containing newly emerging infectious diseases, and also cost saving when compared to not implementing a widespread containment mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: This paper illustrates that it is not only in our humanitarian interest for public health and healthcare officials to remain aggressive in their response to newly emerging infections, but also in our collective economic interest. Despite somewhat daunting initial costs, quarantine saves both lives and money.