Examining the association between perceived stigma, its correlates, and restrictions in participation among persons with disabilities in Nepal: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Disability stigma in low- and middle-income countries is one of the most persistent and complex barriers limiting persons with disabilities (PwDs) from enjoying their rights and opportunities. Perceived stigma among PwDs and its impact on participation restriction is rarely assessed in Nepal. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the extent of perceived stigma by PwDs, identify its relationships with specific demographic factors, and assess the impact on social participation. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted between May and July 2022 among PwDs in Nepal, with a sample of 371. The Explanatory Model Interview Catalog (EMIC) stigma scale and P-scale suitable for people affected by stigmatized conditions were used, and the generated scores were analyzed. One-way ANOVA was performed to determine group differences for sociodemographic variables, and linear regression and correlational analysis were used to identify their association and measure the strength and direction of the relationship. RESULTS: The mean stigma score was 16.9 (SD 13.8). 42% of respondents scored higher than the mean. The scores differed significantly by disability type, caste and ethnicity, education, occupation, and household wealth. Over 56% reported participation restriction, and 38% had severe/extreme restriction. Approximately 65% of participants with intellectual disabilities, 53% with multiple disabilities, and 48.5% of persons with severe or profound disabilities experienced severe or extreme restrictions. Perceived stigma had a positive correlation with Disability type (r = 0.17, P < 0.01) and negative correlations with Severity of disability (r= -0.15, P < 0.05), and Household wealth (r= -0.15, P < 0.01). Education was inversely associated with both stigma (r= -0.24, P < 0.01), and participation restriction (ß= -9.34, P < 0.01). However, there was no association between stigma and participation restriction (ß= -0.10, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: All participants exhibited stigma in general; however, the severity varied based on disability type, level of education, and sociocultural circumstances. A large proportion of participants reported facing a high degree of restrictions in participation; however, no association was detected between perceived stigma and participation restriction. A significant negative linear correlation was observed between education and participation restriction. Stigma reduction programs focusing on education and empowerment would be especially important for overcoming internalized stigma and increasing the participation of PwDs.

Female Clients Satisfaction towards Primary and Secondary Eye Health Facilities and Cost of Eye Care in Nepal.

INTRODUCTION: In Nepal, females suffer from disproportionately higher burden of blindness and vision impairment with low access to eye care. The available knowledge is inadequate to address the issues related to gender and generate information to reduce the gender disparity. The aim of this study was to determine female clients' satisfaction with services at eye facilities in Nepal and to estimate the cost of cataract surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Exit interviews were conducted in 2018 with 308 female clients from eight facilities in five districts. Face to face interviews were conducted using a pretested semi-structured questionnaire adopted from the midterm review of Vision 2020. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 54±17 years. Ninety seven percent (97%) of the participants reported that they received service as per their expectation and were satisfied with the service of the facilities. Major factors for satisfaction were: thorough eye examination (54%), behavior of health staff (40%), and cleanliness of health facility (39%). Another eighty percent (80%) of the participants mentioned that they would recommend or return to the same facility. Fifteen percent of the participants perceived that they faced problems at the eye facility because of their gender. Around three quarters (73%) paid health expenses from their pocket. Most (83%) of the participants rated user fees as either reasonable or inexpensive. CONCLUSION: The majority of participants reported receiving service as expected and willingness to return to the same eye health facility for future consultation. However, most participants had to pay the health care expenses out-of-pocket.

Role of laser refractive surgery in cross-subsidization of nonprofit humanitarian eyecare and the burden of uncorrected refractive error in Nepal: Pilot project.

PURPOSE: To establish a refractive surgery unit at Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology through support from international donations and provide knowledge transfer for doctors and management to make the unit self-sustaining, nonprofit laser refractive surgery, and financial support for other eyecare projects at Tilganga. SETTING: Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology, Kathmandu, Nepal. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: A foundation was created to establish a refractive surgery unit using a cost-recovery model; that is, patients are charged according to their financial status to cover running costs, patients without funds to pay for surgery, and other eyecare projects for the underprivileged population of Kathmandu, Nepal. Donations were obtained to fund refurbishment within Tilganga Hospital and purchase equipment and technology. A Nepalese surgeon was selected from Tilganga and completed an 8-month fellowship and proctorship of the first series of surgeries. The refractive surgery unit was opened in January 2012, and the cost-recovery model was evaluated up to December 2016. RESULTS: During the period evaluated, 74.8% of patients were treated at full cost, 17.2% at subsidized cost, and 8.6% free of charge. The refractive surgery unit generated a profit representing 28% of the running cost in this period, which was used to reduce the deficit of the main hospital. Surgical outcomes achieved were comparable to those reported by groups in the developed world. CONCLUSION: A self-sustaining nonprofit laser refractive surgery clinic, operating with high quality, was successfully implemented supported by international donations for initial setup costs and a cost-recovery model thereafter.