A Prioritized Patient-Centered Research Agenda to Reduce Disparities in Telehealth Uptake: Results from a National Consensus Conference.

Introduction: We hosted a national consensus conference with a diverse group of stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda focused on reducing disparities in telehealth use. Methods: Attendees were purposively invited to participate in a 2-day virtual conference. The group developed a prioritized research agenda focused on reducing disparities in telehealth uptake, with discussion informed by findings from a scoping review. All work was conducted in partnership with a Steering Committee of national experts in telehealth and patient-centered care (n = 5) and a community-based Telehealth Advisory Board with experience with telehealth use and barriers (n = 8). Results: Sixty individuals participated in the conference and discussion resulted in a final list of 20 questions. Fifty-two attendees voted on the final prioritization of these questions. Results were aggregated for all voters (n = 52) and patient-only voters (n = 8). The top question identified by both groups focused on patient and family perspectives on important barriers to telehealth use. The entire group voting identified telehealth's impact on patient outcomes as the next most important questions, while the patient-only group identified trust-related considerations and cultural factors impacting telehealth use as next priorities. Conclusions: This project involved extensive patient and stakeholder engagement. While voting varied between patients only and the entire group of conference attendees, top identified priorities included patient and family perspectives on important barriers to telehealth, trust and cultural barriers and facilitators to telehealth, and assessment of telehealth's impact on patient outcomes. This research agenda can inform design of future research focused on addressing disparities in telehealth use.

Simple and economical HandClench Relaxometer device for reliable and sensitive measurement of grip myotonia in myotonic dystrophy.

Grip myotonia and weakness are attractive treatment response biomarkers in clinical trials of myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1). There is a need to develop simple, patient-friendly and reproducible methods of quantifying grip myotonia in multisite trial settings. We designed a HandClench Relaxometer (HCR) that measures grip myotonia and strength. In contrast with the existing quantitative myometry (QMA) setup, the HCR is portable, economical, can be used with any laptop and generates automated command prompts. We demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of HCR device in twenty DM1 individuals and ten age-matched controls; patients returned for follow up within two months. The device showed excellent day to day reproducibility (ICC >0.80) in patients. The HCR device detected myotonia in milder muscle disease and measured longer myotonia duration than QMA indicating enhanced sensitivity for quantifying myotonia in DM1. The reaction time to the relax but not squeeze command was delayed and showed warm up similar to myotonia in DM1. HCR outcomes were correlated with key pinch strength, hand dexterity test, and fat replacement in the MRI of the long finger flexor muscles. Use of the HCR is warranted for grip myotonia and strength measurements in longitudinal observational and interventional studies of DM1.

Minimally invasive assessment of tumor angiogenesis by fine needle aspiration and flow cytometry.

The development of a new, less invasive, and more rapidly implemented method of quantifying endothelial cell density in tumors could facilitate experimental and clinical studies of angiogenesis. Therefore, we evaluated the utility of tumor fine needle aspiration (FNA) coupled with flow cytometry for assessment of tumor angiogenesis. Samples were obtained from cutaneous tumors of mice using FNA, then immunostained and assessed by flow cytometry to determine the number of CD31(+) endothelial cells. Results of the FNA/flow cytometry technique were compared with quantification of tumor microvessel density using immunohistochemistry. The ability of the FNA/cytometry technique to quantify the effects of anti-angiogenic therapy and to monitor changes in tumor angiogenesis over time in individual tumors was also determined. We found that endothelial cell percentages determined in tumor tissue aspirates by flow cytometry correlated well with the percentages of endothelial cells determined in whole tumor digests by flow cytometry and with tumor microvessel density measurements by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we found that repeated FNA sampling of tumors did not induce endothelial cell changes. Interestingly, by employing repeated FNA sampling of the same tumors we were able to observe a sudden and marked decline in tumor angiogenesis triggered when tumors reached a certain size. Thus, we conclude that the FNA/flow cytometry technique is an efficient, reproducible, and relatively non-invasive method of rapidly assessing tumor angiogenesis, which could be readily applied to evaluation of tumor angiogenesis in clinical settings in humans.