Assessment of the Artemia salina toxicity assay as a substitute of the mouse lethality assay in the determination of venom-induced toxicity and preclinical efficacy of antivenom.

Mice are routinely used in snake venom research but are costly and subject to pain and suffering. The crustacean Artemia salina could be an alternative to mice, but data to support its adoption in snake venom research is limited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the suitability of A. salina as a surrogate of mice in assessing the toxicity of venoms and the preclinical efficacy of antivenoms. The toxicity of venoms from 22 snakes of medical importance in sub-Saharan Africa was evaluated in mice (intraperitoneally; i.p. and intravenously; i.v.) and in A. salina. Subsequently, the capacity of a commercial antivenom to neutralize the toxicity of these venoms in mice and A. salina was investigated. There was a positive correlation between the i.v. median lethal doses (LD50s) and the i.p. LD50s in mice (r = 0.804; p < 0.0001), a moderate correlation between the i.v. LD50s in mice and the median lethal concentrations (LC50s) in A. salina (r = 0.606; p = 0.003), and a moderate correlation between the i.p. LD50s in mice and the LC50s in A. salina (r = 0.426; p = 0.048). Moreover, there was a strong correlation between the i.p. median effective doses (ED50s) and the i.v. ED50s in mice (r = 0.941, p < 0.0001), between the i.p. ED50s in mice and the ED50s in A. salina (r = 0.818, p < 0.0001), and between the i.v. ED50s in mice and the ED50s in A. salina (r = 0.972, p < 0.0001). These findings present A. salina as a promising candidate for reducing reliance on mice in snake venom research. Future investigations should build upon these findings, addressing potential limitations and expanding the scope of A. salina in venom research and antivenom development.

Neutralization, by a polyspecific antivenom, of the coagulopathy induced by the venom of Bothrops asper: Assessment by standard coagulation tests and rotational thromboelastometry in a murine model.

Venom-induced consumption coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia are common and potentially severe manifestations of viperid snakebite envenoming since they contribute to local and systemic hemorrhage. Therefore, the assessment of the efficacy of antivenoms to neutralize coagulopathic and thrombocytopenic toxins should be part of the preclinical evaluation of these drugs. To evaluate the efficacy of the polyvalent (Crotalinae) antivenom produced in Costa Rica, in this study we have used a mouse model of coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia induced by the venom of Bothrops asper, based on the bolus intravenous (i.v.) injection of venom. When venom and antivenom were incubated before injection, or when antivenom was administered i.v. immediately after venom injection, venom-induced hemostatic alterations were largely abrogated. We also studied the recovery rate of clotting parameters in conditions where antivenom was administered when mice were coagulopathic. Some parameters recovered more rapidly in antivenom-treated mice than in control envenomed animals, but others showed a spontaneous recovery without antivenom. This is due to a rapid clearance of plasma venom levels in these experimental conditions. This implies that models based on the bolus i.v. injection of venom have limitations for assessing the effect of antivenom in the recovery of clotting alterations once coagulopathy has developed. It is suggested that alternative models should be developed based on a slower systemic absorption of venom. Overall, our findings provide a protocol for the preclinical evaluation of antivenoms and demonstrate that the polyvalent antivenom is effective in neutralizing the toxins of B. asper venom responsible for coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia.

Preliminary assessment of antivenom availability and management in the public health system of Costa Rica: An analysis based on a survey to pharmacists in public health facilities.

Availability and accessibility of safe and effective antivenoms are key elements for the successful treatment of snakebite envenoming (SBE). This study provides a preliminary analysis on the way antivenoms are managed by the public health system in Costa Rica and on the role played by pharmacists in the overall management of antivenoms. This was an observational, cross-sectional study based on an online survey sent to pharmacists working at Caja Costarricense de Seguro Social (Costa Rican Social Security System; CCSS) in different locations in Costa Rica. Characteristics and location of health facilities, as well as antivenom availability and management details, were analyzed. Responses from a total of 96 pharmacists, corresponding to 55 different healthcare facilities, were included in this study. Most respondents worked at pharmacies located in urban communities (69.0%) and in the secondary level of care, which includes clinics, and regional and peripheral hospitals (55.2%). Overall, participants reported antivenom availability at all levels of care and in centers having various operating schedules, although they were not available in some facilities in regions where SBE is uncommon or do not attend SBE cases because of the proximity of more complex health centers. On average, the stocks of anticoral and polyvalent antivenoms per health facility were compatible with the dose of antivenom required for treating a SBE case. More than half of participants reported knowing the availability of protocols for the management of SBE and the correct use of antivenom at their healthcare facilities. Of the total respondents, 49% agreed on possessing all the resources needed for the correct management of these medicines at their facilities, and 65.6% indicated that they know the procedures for antivenom storage and management. Our findings provide a first description of the availability of antivenoms in the public health system of Costa Rica, including the primary care level. Results also underscore the perceived role of participating pharmacists in the management of these life-saving drugs and the need to improve their knowledge on this topic.

Proteomics and histological assessment of an organotypic model of human skin following exposure to Naja nigricollis venom.

Snakebite envenoming was reintroduced as a Category A Neglected Tropical Disease by the World Health Organization in 2017. Since then, increased attention has been directed towards this affliction and towards the development of a deeper understanding of how snake venoms exert their toxic effects and how antivenoms can counter them. However, most of our in vivo generated knowledge stems from the use of animal models which do not always accurately reflect how the pathogenic effects of snake venoms manifest in humans. Moreover, animal experiments are associated with pain, distress, and eventually animal sacrifice due to the toxic nature of snake venoms. Related to this, the implementation of the 3Rs principle (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement) in the use of experimental animals in snakebite envenoming research is recommended by the World Health Organization. Therefore, more humane experimental designs and new in vitro/ex vivo alternatives for experimental animals are sought after. Here, we report the use of an organotypic model of human skin to further elucidate the pathophysiology of the dermonecrotic effects caused by the venom of the black-necked spitting cobra, Naja nigricollis, in humans. The goal of this study is to expand the repertoire of available models that can be used to study the local tissue damages induced by cytotoxic venoms.

The application of laboratory-based analytical tools and techniques for the quality assessment and improvement of commercial antivenoms used in the treatment of snakebite envenomation.

Snakebite envenomation is a public health problem of high impact, particularly for the developing world. Antivenom, which contains whole or protease-digested immunoglobulin G, purified from the plasma of hyper-immunized animals (mainly horses), is the mainstay for the treatment of snakebite envenomation. The success of antivenom therapy depends upon its ability to abrogate or reduce the local and systemic toxicity of envenomation. In addition, antivenom administration must be safe for the patients. Therefore, antivenom manufacturers must ensure that these products are effective and safe in the treatment of envenomations. Antivenom efficacy and safety are determined by the physicochemical characteristics of formulations, purity of the immunoglobulin fragments and antibodies, presence of protein aggregates, endotoxin burden, preservative load, and batch to batch variation, as well as on the ability to neutralize the most important toxins of the venoms against which the antivenom is designed. In this context, recent studies have shown that laboratory-based simple analytical techniques, for example, size exclusion chromatography, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, mass spectrometry, immunological profiling including immuno-turbidimetry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, Western blotting, immune-chromatographic technique coupled to mass spectrometry analysis, reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography, spectrofluorometric analysis, in vitro neutralization of venom enzymatic activities, and other methodologies, can be applied for the assessment of antivenom quality, safety, stability, and efficacy. This article reviews the usefulness of different analytical techniques for the quality assessment of commercial antivenoms. It is suggested that these tests should be applied for screening the quality of commercial antivenoms before their preclinical and clinical assessment.

Paediatric snakebite envenoming: the world's most neglected 'Neglected Tropical Disease'?

Snakebite disproportionally affects children living in impoverished rural communities. The WHO has recently reinstated snakebites on its list of Neglected Tropical Diseases and launched a comprehensive Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Snakebite Envenoming. In the first of a two paper series, we describe the epidemiology, socioeconomic impact and key prevention strategies. We also explore current challenges and priorities including the production and distribution of safe and effective antivenom.

Snakebite envenoming in French Guiana: Assessment of the preclinical efficacy against the venom of Bothrops atrox of two polyspecific antivenoms.

Snakebite envenoming is a relevant public health problem in French Guiana, and Bothrops atrox is responsible for the vast majority of envenomings in this overseas French territory. The preclinical efficacy of freeze-dried antivenoms manufactured in Costa Rica (Polival-ICP®) and Mexico (Antivipmyn Tri®) was assessed against the lethal, hemorrhagic, in vitro coagulant, and myotoxic effects of Bothrops atrox venom from French Guiana. Antivenoms differ in protein concentration and in the type of active principle (IgG and F (ab')2, respectively). Polival-ICP® showed significantly higher neutralizing activity against lethal, hemorrhagic and in vitro coagulant activities of the venom. Antivenoms neutralized myotoxic effect to a similar extent. In the case of lethal activity, Antivipmyn Tri® did not neutralize the effect at the highest antivenom level tested (1 mg venom/mL antivenom).

Vipera berus berus Venom from Russia: Venomics, Bioactivities and Preclinical Assessment of Microgen Antivenom.

The common European adder, Vipera berus berus, is a medically relevant species, which is widely distributed in Russia and thus, is responsible for most snakebite accidents in Russia. We have investigated the toxic and enzymatic activities and have determined the proteomic composition of its venom. Phospholipases A2 (PLA2, 25.3% of the venom proteome), serine proteinases (SVSP, 16.2%), metalloproteinases (SVMP, 17.2%), vasoactive peptides (bradykinin-potentiating peptides (BPPs), 9.5% and C-type natriuretic peptides (C-NAP, 7.8%), cysteine-rich secretory protein (CRISP, 8%) and L-amino acid oxidase (LAO, 7.3%) represent the major toxin classes found in V. b. berus (Russia) venom. This study was also designed to assess the in vivo and in vitro preclinical efficacy of the Russian Microgen antivenom in neutralizing the main effects of V. b. berus venom. The results show that this antivenom is capable of neutralizing the lethal, hemorrhagic and PLA2 activities. Third-generation antivenomics was applied to quantify the toxin-recognition landscape and the maximal binding capacity of the antivenom for each component of the venom. The antivenomics analysis revealed that 6.24% of the anti-V. b. berus F(ab')2 molecules fraction are toxin-binding antibodies, 60% of which represent clinically relevant antivenom molecules.

Preclinical assessment of the neutralizing efficacy of snake antivenoms in Latin America and the Caribbean: A review.

The preclinical evaluation of the neutralizing efficacy of antivenoms is mandatory before a product is introduced for clinical use. The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for antivenoms categorize the tests used in preclinical studies as 'essential assay' (neutralization of lethality) and 'additional recommended assays' (neutralization of other relevant toxic activities). The present review presents an overview of the methodological aspects of snake antivenom preclinical efficacy tests, and summarizes the studies performed in this subject on antivenoms used in Latin America and the Caribbean. General trends emerging from this analysis show that: (a) Bothrops antivenoms have a broad spectrum of neutralizing efficacy against venoms of snakes of the genera Agkistrodon, Atropoides, Bothriechis, Bothrops, Cerrophidion, and Porthidium. (b) Crotalus antivenoms show a dichotomic pattern of efficacy depending on whether the venoms used for immunization are crotoxin-rich or metalloproteinase-rich. (c) A complete neutralization of Lachesis sp venoms is achieved only by antivenoms that include Lachesis sp venoms in the immunizing mixture. (d) Micrurus sp venoms have a high immunological heterogeneity which impacts in the cross-neutralization by available antivenoms. There is a need to further expand the knowledge base of the preclinical efficacy of antivenoms in Latin America and the Caribbean.

An improved technique for the assessment of venom-induced haemorrhage in a murine model.

Haemorrhage is a common clinical manifestation in envenomings caused by bites from snakes of the family Viperidae. Therefore, knowing the haemorrhagic potential of venoms and the capacity of antivenoms to neutralise this effect are of paramount relevance in toxinology. The most widely used method for quantifying haemorrhage involves the intradermal injection of venom (or a mixture of venom/antivenom) in mice, and the assessment of the resulting haemorrhagic area in the inner side of the skin. Although this method allows a straightforward assessment of the haemorrhagic activity of a venom, it does not account for haemorrhagic lesions having a similar area but differing in the depth and intensity of haemorrhage. We have developed an approach that allows the assessment of both area and intensity of a venom-induced haemorrhagic lesion using computational tools and propose a unit to represent the combination of these two factors as a measure of haemorrhage intensity, namely haemorrhagic unit (HaU). A strong correlation was observed between haemoglobin extracted from a haemorrhagic lesion and the associated HaUs. The method was used to determine the haemorrhagic activity of the venoms of Bothrops asper, Echis ocellatus and Crotalus basiliscus and the haemorrhage neutralising capabilities of the three associated antivenoms. Overall, the ease of use, as well as the time involved in this new method, makes its implementation very feasible in the determination of haemorrhagic activity of venoms and its neutralisation by antivenoms in the murine model.

Understanding and confronting snakebite envenoming: The harvest of cooperation.

During 45 years, the Instituto Clodomiro Picado (ICP, University of Costa Rica) has developed an ambitious scientific, technological, productive, and social program aimed at providing a better understanding of snakes and their venoms, contributing to the development, production and distribution of antivenoms, improving the prevention and management of snakebite envenomings, and strengthening human resources in science and technology. Among other topics, its research agenda has focused on the local tissue alterations induced by viperid snake venoms, i.e. myonecrosis, hemorrhage, dermonecrosis, extracellular matrix degradation, lymphatic vessel damage, and inflammation. In addition, the preclinical efficacy of antivenoms has been thoroughly investigated, together with the technological development of novel antivenoms. ICP's project has been based on a philosophical frame characterized by: (a) An integrated approach for confronting the problem of snakebites, involving research, production, extension activities, and teaching; (b) a cooperative and team work perspective in the pursuit of scientific, technological, productive, and social goals; (c) a search for excellence and continuous improvement in the quality of its activities; and (d) a vision of solidarity and compassion, based on the realization that snakebite envenomings mostly affect impoverished vulnerable populations in the rural settings of developing countries. A key aspect in this program has been the consolidation of international partnerships with groups of all continents, within a frame of academic and social cooperation, some of which are described in this review.

Omics meets biology: application to the design and preclinical assessment of antivenoms.

Snakebite envenoming represents a neglected tropical disease that has a heavy public health impact worldwide, mostly affecting poor people involved in agricultural activities in Africa, Asia, Latin America and Oceania. A key issue that complicates the treatment of snakebite envenomings is the poor availability of the only validated treatment for this disease, antivenoms. Antivenoms can be an efficacious treatment for snakebite envenoming, provided they are safe, effective, affordable, accessible and administered appropriately. The shortage of antivenoms in various regions, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa and some parts of Asia, can be significantly alleviated by optimizing the use of current antivenoms and by the generation of novel polyspecific antivenoms having a wide spectrum of efficacy. Complementing preclinical testing of antivenom efficacy using in vivo and in vitro functional neutralization assays, developments in venomics and antivenomics are likely to revolutionize the design and preclinical assessment of antivenoms by being able to test new antivenom preparations and to predict their paraspecific neutralization to the level of species-specific toxins.

A multicomponent strategy to improve the availability of antivenom for treating snakebite envenoming.

Snakebite envenoming is a common but neglected public health problem, particularly in impoverished rural regions of sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and Latin America. The only validated treatment for this condition is passive immunotherapy with safe and effective animal-derived antivenoms. However, there is a long-lasting crisis in the availability of these life-saving medications, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia. We herein advocate a multicomponent strategy to substantially improve the availability of safe and effective antivenoms at the global level. This strategy is based on: (i) preparing validated collections of representative venom pools from the most medically dangerous snakes in high-risk regions of the world; (ii) strengthening the capacity of national antivenom manufacturing and quality control laboratories and their regulatory authorities and establishing new facilities in developing countries through technology transfer, as an integral part of efforts to develop their biological products industry; (iii) getting established laboratories to generate antivenoms for various regions of the world; and (iv) getting governments and relevant organizations to give snakebite envenoming due recognition within national and international public health policy frameworks. These ways of making antivenom available should be complemented by actions to improve health information systems, the accessibility of antivenoms, the training of medical and nursing staff, and community-based education. Such a multicomponent strategy involving stakeholders on many levels could help consolidate sustainable improvements in antivenom availability worldwide.

L'envenimation par morsure de serpent est un problème de santé publique fréquent, mais négligé, en particulier dans les régions rurales pauvres de l'Afrique subsaharienne, de l'Asie et de l'Amérique latine. Le seul traitement validé pour soigner cet état est l'immunothérapie passive avec des sérums antivenimeux d'origine animale sûrs et efficaces. Cependant, une crise durable limite actuellement la disponibilité de ces médicaments vitaux, surtout en Afrique subsaharienne et dans certaines parties de l'Asie. Nous préconisons ici une stratégie à composants multiples pour améliorer considérablement la disponibilité des sérums antivenimeux sûrs et efficaces à l'échelle mondiale. Cette stratégie repose sur: (i) la préparation de collections validées de groupes représentatifs de venins prélevés sur les serpents les plus dangereux sur le plan médical dans les régions à haut risque du monde; (ii) le renforcement de la capacité de production nationale des sérums antivenimeux, des laboratoires de contrôle qualité et de leurs organismes de réglementation, et la création de nouvelles installations dans les pays en développement par transfert de technologies, en tant que partie intégrante de la stratégie de développement de leur industrie de produits biologiques; (iii) la production par les laboratoires déjà établis de sérums antivenimeux pour les différentes régions du monde; et (iv) la reconnaissance officielle par les gouvernements et les organisations compétentes de l'envenimation par morsure de serpent dans le cadre des politiques de santé publique nationales et internationales. Ces façons de rendre disponibles les sérums antivenimeux devraient être complétées par des actions visant à améliorer les systèmes d'informations sanitaires, l'accessibilité des sérums antivenimeux, la formation du personnel médical et infirmier et les programmes communautaires d'éducation. Une telle stratégie à composants multiples impliquant des acteurs à différents niveaux pourrait contribuer à consolider les améliorations durables en matière de disponibilité des sérums antivenimeux dans le monde entier.

El envenenamiento por mordedura de serpiente es un problema de salud pública común pero desatendido, especialmente en las regiones rurales más pobres de África subsahariana, Asia y América Latina. El único tratamiento reconocido contra estas mordeduras es la inmunoterapia pasiva con sueros antiofídicos de origen animal seguros y eficaces. Sin embargo, la disponibilidad de estos medicamentos esenciales para salvar vidas lleva mucho tiempo en crisis, en particular en África subsahariana y en algunas zonas de Asia. En el presente documento, abogamos por una estrategia multicomponente para mejorar de forma sustancial la disponibilidad de sueros antiofídicos seguros y eficaces en todo el mundo. La estrategia se basa en: (i) preparar colecciones reconocidas de sueros antiofídicos representativos de las serpientes más peligrosas en zonas de alto riesgo del mundo; (ii) reforzar la capacidad nacional de producción de sueros antiofídicos y la calidad de los laboratorios de control y sus autoridades normativas, así como crear instalaciones nuevas en los países en desarrollo por medio de la transferencia de tecnología como parte integral de los esfuerzos por desarrollar su industria de productos biológicos; (iii) conseguir que los laboratorios consolidados fabriquen sueros antiofídicos para varias regiones del mundo; y (iv) conseguir que los gobiernos y las organizaciones pertinentes otorguen al envenenamiento por mordedura de serpiente el reconocimiento debido dentro del marco de las políticas nacionales e internacionales de salud pública. Estas tareas dirigidas a facilitar el suero antiofídico deben complementarse con acciones para mejorar los sistemas de información sobre la salud, la accesibilidad de los antiofídicos, la formación del personal médico y de enfermería, y la educación comunitaria. Una estrategia multicomponente de ese tipo, que incluye a los interesados a varios niveles, podría ayudar a consolidar mejoras sostenibles en la disponibilidad de antiofídicos en todo el mundo.

Toxicity of Bothrops sp snake venoms from Ecuador and preclinical assessment of the neutralizing efficacy of a polyspecific antivenom from Costa Rica.

The toxicological profile of the venoms of the snakes Bothrops asper and Bothrops atrox from Ecuador was investigated, together with the venom of a population of B. asper formerly classified as 'Bothrops xanthogrammus'. The three venoms exerted lethal, hemorrhagic, myotoxic, coagulant and defibrinogenating effects, in agreement with the characteristic toxicological profile of Bothrops sp venoms. A polyspecific antivenom (bothropic-crotalic-lachesic) manufactured in Costa Rica was assessed for its preclinical efficacy against the toxic activities of these Ecuadorian venoms. Antivenom was effective in the neutralization of the five activities tested in the three venoms. These observations are in agreement with previous reports on the extensive cross-reactivity and paraspecific neutralization of antivenoms manufactured in Latin America against the venoms of Bothrops sp snakes.

Snake venomics of Lachesis muta rhombeata and genus-wide antivenomics assessment of the paraspecific immunoreactivity of two antivenoms evidence the high compositional and immunological conservation across Lachesis.

We report the proteomic analysis of the Atlantic bushmaster, Lachesis muta rhombeata, from Brazil. Along with previous characterization of the venom proteomes of L. stenophrys (Costa Rica), L. melanocephala (Costa Rica), L. acrochorda (Colombia), and L. muta muta (Bolivia), the present study provides the first overview of the composition and distribution of venom proteins across this wide-ranging genus, and highlights the remarkable similar compositional and pharmacological profiles across Lachesis venoms. The paraspecificity of two antivenoms, produced at Instituto Vital Brazil (Brazil) and Instituto Clodomiro Picado (Costa Rica) using different conspecific taxa in the immunization mixtures, was assessed using genus-wide comparative antivenomics. This study confirms that the proteomic similarity among Lachesis sp. venoms is mirrored in their high immunological conservation across the genus. The clinical and therapeutic consequences of genus-wide venomics and antivenomics investigations of Lachesis venoms are discussed. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The proteomics characterization of L. m. rhombeata venom completes the overview of Lachesis venom proteomes and confirms the remarkable toxin profile conservation across the five clades of this wide-ranging genus. Genus-wide antivenomics showed that two antivenoms, produced against L. stenophrys or L. m. rhombeata, exhibit paraspecificity towards all other congeneric venoms. Our venomics study shows that, despite the broad geographic distribution of the genus, monospecific antivenoms may achieve clinical coverage for any Lachesis sp. envenoming.

Preclinical assessment of a polyspecific antivenom against the venoms of Cerrophidion sasai, Porthidium nasutum and Porthidium ophryomegas: Insights from combined antivenomics and neutralization assays.

A polyspecific antivenom is used in Central America for the treatment of envenomings by viperid snakes. This antivenom is generated in horses hyperimmunized with a mixture of venoms from Bothrops asper, Crotalus simus and Lachesis stenophrys. The present study analyzed the ability of this antivenom to neutralize the venoms of three Central American viperid species of the 'Porthidium group', i.e. Porthidium nasutum, Porthidium ophryomegas and Cerrophidion sasai, formerly classified as Cerrophidion godmani. In addition, the immunorecognition of the components of these venoms was assessed by immunoaffinity antivenomics. The antivenom proved effective in neutralizing the lethal, hemorrhagic, myotoxic, phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)) and proteinase activities of the three venoms, albeit exhibiting quantitative differences in the values of the Median Effective Doses (ED(50)). Excepting for certain low molecular mass bands corresponding to disintegrins, and some PLA(2)s and PI-metalloproteinases, Western blotting and immunoaffinity chromatography revealed immunorecognition of most Porthidium and Cerrophidion venom proteins. In agreement with in vivo neutralization assays, immobilized antivenom IgGs showed higher immunocapturing activity of toxins from both Porthidium taxa than from C. sasai. Overall our results demonstrate a significant paraspecific protection of the Costa Rican polyspecific antivenom against the three venoms sampled. They also stress the need to search for novel ways to enhance the immune response of horses against several weakly immunogenic venom components.

Assessment of snake antivenom purity by comparing physicochemical and immunochemical methods.

Purity is a characteristic that, together with effectiveness and safety, must be tested to determine the quality of biopharmaceutical products. In therapeutic immunoglobulins, such as human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), purity is evaluated on the basis of physicochemical properties, and is usually assessed by chromatography and electrophoresis. However, in the case of antivenoms these methods fail to discriminate between antibodies towards venom antigens, which constitute the active substance, and antibodies towards non-venom antigens, which are the major impurities in most of the current formulations. The assessment of this aspect of purity requires the use of the immunochemical methods. In this study, it was demonstrated that antivenoms showing physicochemical purity higher than 90% might present immunochemical purity lower than 40%. It is proposed that a comprehensive analysis of antivenom purity should combine physicochemical and immunochemical parameters. In addition, these results are crucial to decide the more appropriate strategies to improve antivenom purity. Taking into account that the current methods of antivenom purification remove most non-antibodies proteins, we propose that efforts must be primarily directed to the improvement of immunization protocols to enhance the antibody response towards venom components in hyperimmunized animals, and secondarily, in the realm of immunoglobulin purification technology.