RESUMO
Purpose We describe the key elements of early palliative care (PC) across the illness trajectory and examine whether visit content was associated with patient-reported outcomes and end-of-life care. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of patients with newly diagnosed advanced lung or noncolorectal GI cancer (N = 171) who were randomly assigned to receive early PC. Participants attended at least monthly visits with board-certified PC physicians and advanced practice nurses at Massachusetts General Hospital. PC clinicians completed surveys documenting visit content after each encounter. Patients reported quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) and mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9) at baseline and 24 weeks. End-of-life care data were abstracted from the electronic health record. We summarized visit content over time and used linear and logistic regression to identify whether the proportion of visits addressing a content area was associated with patient-reported outcomes and end-of-life care. Results We analyzed data from 2,921 PC visits, most of which addressed coping (64.2%) and symptom management (74.5%). By 24 weeks, patients who had a higher proportion of visits that addressed coping experienced improved quality of life ( P = .02) and depression symptoms (Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, P = .002; Patient Health Questionnaire-9, P = .004). Patients who had a higher proportion of visits address treatment decisions were less likely to initiate chemotherapy ( P = .02) or be hospitalized ( P = .005) in the 60 days before death. Patients who had a higher proportion of visits addressing advance care planning were more likely to use hospice ( P = .03). Conclusion PC clinicians' focus on coping, treatment decisions, and advance care planning is associated with improved patient outcomes. These data define the key elements of early PC to enable dissemination of the integrated care model.
Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Assistência Terminal/métodos , Adaptação Psicológica , Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Afeto , Idoso , Boston , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/psicologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Participação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Researchers administering surveys seek to balance data quality, sources of error, and practical concerns when selecting an administration mode. Rarely are decisions about survey administration based on the background of study participants, although socio-demographic characteristics like age, education, and race may contribute to participants' (non)responses. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we describe differences in paper- and web-based surveys administered in a national cancer survivor study of women with a history of cancer to compare the ability of each survey administrative mode to provide quality, generalizable data. METHODS: We compared paper- and web-based survey data by socio-demographic characteristics of respondents, missing data rates, scores on primary outcome measure, and administrative costs and time using descriptive statistics, tests of mean group differences, and linear regression. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that more potentially vulnerable patients preferred paper questionnaires and that data quality, responses, and costs significantly varied by mode and participants' demographic information. We provide targeted suggestions for researchers conducting survey research to reduce survey error and increase generalizability of study results to the patient population of interest. CONCLUSION: Researchers must carefully weigh the pros and cons of survey administration modes to ensure a representative sample and high-quality data.
Assuntos
Internet , Neoplasias , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente , Viés de Seleção , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Populações Vulneráveis/psicologiaRESUMO
Females' experiences of identity, health, and equity share similar features around the world. This literary analysis describes the narratives of 4 female protagonists from popular fiction novels to identify similarities between their personal and contextualized experiences. The impact these private realities and public structures have on female health will be used to demonstrate the universal ecological threats to women's health. In conclusion, we offer suggestions on how to incorporate the shared female movement from domination and separation toward liberation and connection into modern health care practices that emphasize shared decision making, open communication, and social activism.