Author Correction: Differential Assessment of Factor Xa Activity and Global Blood Coagulability Utilizing Novel Dielectric Coagulometry.

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.

Differential Assessment of Factor Xa Activity and Global Blood Coagulability Utilizing Novel Dielectric Coagulometry.

An easy-to-use assessment for activated factor X (FXa) is lacking despite its pivotal role in the coagulation. Dielectric blood coagulometry (DBCM) was recently invented as a novel assessment tool for determining the whole blood coagulability by measuring the temporal change in the permittivity of blood. We previously reported that it could evaluate the global blood coagulability. This study aimed to apply the DBCM for assessing FXa activity and its inhibition by anticoagulants. We performed the DBCM analysis along with measurement of the FXa activity by a fluorometric assay in samples from healthy subjects, and identified a new index named maximum acceleration time (MAT) that had a correlation to the FXa activity. Next the DBCM analysis was performed using blood samples mixed with anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin, dalteparin, and edoxaban). Blood samples with three anticoagulants had different profiles of the temporal change in the permittivity, reflecting their different selectivity for FXa. We compared the MAT with the anti-FXa activity assay, and found that the prolongation of MAT was similarly correlated with the anti-FXa activity regardless of the type of anticoagulants. In conclusion, the DBCM has the possibility for evaluating the innate FXa activity and effect of anticoagulants focusing on their FXa inhibition.

[Software for illustrating a cost-quality balance carried out by clinical laboratory practice].

We have no proper reference indicating the quality of clinical laboratory practice, which should clearly illustrates that better medical tests require more expenses. Japanese Society of Laboratory Medicine was concerned about recent difficult medical economy and issued a committee report proposing a guideline to evaluate the good laboratory practice. According to the guideline, we developed software that illustrate a cost-quality balance carried out by clinical laboratory practice. We encountered a number of controversial problems, for example, how to measure and weight each quality-related factor, how to calculate costs of a laboratory test and how to consider characteristics of a clinical laboratory. Consequently we finished only prototype software within the given period and the budget. In this paper, software implementation of the guideline and the above-mentioned problems are summarized. Aiming to stimulate these discussions, the operative software will be put on the Society's homepage for trial