Choroidal Assessment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy by Swept-Source Ocular Coherence Tomography and Image Binarization.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate choroidal structure and vascularity indices in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). Materials and Methods: Sixty-three eyes from sixty-three patients were evaluated: 21 from healthy subjects, 20 with diabetes mellitus (DM) and no diabetic retinopathy (DR), and 22 with DM and non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy without diabetic macular edema (DME). Each patient underwent ocular examination, macular swept-source ocular coherence tomography (SS-OCT) imaging, glycemic control, and systemic high blood pressure (HBP) evaluation. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SF-CT) was manually assessed on a line scan. Line scan OCT images were exported to ImageJ program. The areas under a 1.5, 3 and 6 mm horizontal line centered on the fovea were assessed by converting the OCT images to binary images, and total choroidal area (TCA), luminal area (LA), stromal area (SA), LA:SA ratio, and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were evaluated. SF-CT and choroidal parameters were compared between groups, and correlations with ocular and systemic factors were analyzed. Results: SF-CT, TCA, LA, and SA were similar between groups. CVIs were significantly different between groups for all three studied areas (CVI-1.5: 66.21% vs. 66.06% vs. 63.74%, p = 0.003; CVI-3: 65.88% vs. 66.46% vs. 63.79%, p = 0.008; CVI-6: 64.79% vs. 65.40% vs. 63.61%, p = 0.032). NPDR patients had significantly lower CVIs compared to DM patients (p < 0.05). No association of choroidal parameters with glycemic control, DM duration and HBP was found significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Choroidal assessment by SS-OCT and image binarization in healthy subjects, subjects with DM without DR, and subjects with DM and NPDR indicated that CVI changes were identifiable and significant in early DR. The lack of association with ocular and systemic factors suggest that CVIs are reliable assessment parameters of choroidal vascular structure.

Posterior choroidal boundary morphology and segmentation errors influence on choroidal thickness assessment in diabetic patients - a swept-source OCT study.

Objective: to evaluate the choroidal morphology and choroidal thickness (CT) in normal and diabetic subjects and to compare the differences between automated segmentation (AS) and manual segmentation (MS) of the choroid. Methods: in this observational cross-sectional study we included 48 eyes: 24 normal eyes (group 1), 9 eyes with DM without diabetic retinopathy (DR) (group 2) and 15 eyes with DM and DR (group 3). Swept-source OCT line scans images were analyzed for the presence of the suprachoroidal layer (SCL), choroidal morphology and the CT was measured manually subfoveal and at 750 µ both nasal and temporal to the fovea after AS and MS. SCL was not included in the CT evaluation. CT values were compared between the groups and between the three points of evaluation. Results: SCL was visualized in 21 eyes (43.8%). In diabetic patients, SCL was visible in 11 (45.83%) cases and in nondiabetic patients, in 10 eyes (41.66%). There was a good AS of Bruch's membrane, which was not further corrected manually. There were statistically significant differences between AS and MS at the level of CSJ for all three locations in all three groups (P ≤ 0.01). After MS, the choroid was statistically significantly thicker. Group 2 and group 3 showed a higher CT thickness. There were no statistically significant differences in the CT between groups in all three locations. Conclusions: Defining posterior choroidal boundary and the applied segmentation method can result in differences in CT measurements. Diabetic patients have altered CT and choroidal morphology. Abbreviations: CT = choroidal thickness, AS = automated segmentation, MS = manual segmentation, CSJ = choroidoscleral junction, SCL = suprachoroidal layer, SCS = suprachoroidal space, DM = diabetes mellitus, DR = diabetic retinopathy, RPE = retinal pigmented epithelium, BM = Buch's membrane.

Digital microscopy assessment of angiogenesis in different breast cancer compartments.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Tumour angiogenesis defined by microvessel density (MVD) is generally accepted as a prognostic factor in breast cancer. However, due to variability of measurement systems and cutoffs, it is questionable to date whether it contributes to predictive outline. Our study aims to grade vascular heterogeneity by comparing clear-cut compartments: tumour associated stroma (TAS), tumour parenchyma, and tumour invasive front. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Computerized vessel area measurement was performed using a tissue cytometry system (TissueFAXS) on slides originated from 50 patients with breast cancer. Vessels were marked using immunohistochemistry with CD34. Regions of interest were manually defined for each tumour compartment. RESULTS: Tumour invasive front vascular endothelia area was 2.15 times higher than that in tumour parenchyma and 4.61 times higher than that in TAS (P < 0.002). Worth to mention that the lymph node negative subgroup of patients show a slight but constant increase of vessel index in all examined compartments of breast tumour. CONCLUSION: Whole slide digital examination and region of interest (ROI) analysis are a valuable tool in scoring angiogenesis markers and disclosing their prognostic capacity. Our study reveals compartments' variability of vessel density inside the tumour and highlights the propensity of invasive front to associate an active process of angiogenesis with potential implications in adjuvant therapy.