Ethiopian medical schools' rapid scale-up to support the government's goal of universal coverage.

In 2003, Ethiopia declared it would pursue the goal of universal primary health coverage. In response to the critical shortage of human resources for health care, the government decided to rapidly increase the training of health workers to provide basic services, including health education, disease prevention, and family health services primarily to rural areas. This approach, which became known as the "flooding strategy," was extended in 2005 to include medical doctors. Between 2003 and 2009, the number of universities and health science colleges grew from 5 to 23, and the original 5 medical schools were given a mandate to increase their annual enrollment by three to four times. This article describes how the "flooding strategy" strained and threatened the quality of the Ethiopian medical education system and how Addis Ababa University responded by leveraging a timely grant through the Medical Education Partnership Initiative (MEPI) to support the establishment of a consortium of four Ethiopian medical schools (MEPI-E). The consortium goals are to address the new demands by (1) maintaining and improving the quality of education through innovation and efficient use of resources, (2) developing and implementing new strategies to build human capacity and promote faculty retention, and (3) increasing locally relevant research and bioethics capacity. Implementation of program began in May 2011. Although it is still under way, MEPI-E has already catalyzed the development of a national network of medical schools, enabling unprecedented collaboration to respond to the increased demands on the Ethiopian medical education system.

Randomized trial of brief office-based interventions to reduce adolescent alcohol use.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether office-based interventions change adolescents' alcohol beliefs and alcohol use. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Five managed care group practices in Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive 12- to 17-year-olds (N = 409) seeing primary care providers (N = 26) for general check-ups. Most of the adolescents (79%) were African American, 44% were male, and 16% currently drank. INTERVENTIONS: Usual care (Group I), adolescent priming with alcohol self-assessment just prior to check-up (Group II), adolescent priming and provider prompting with adolescent self-assessment and brochure (Group III). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adolescent alcohol beliefs at exit interview and self-reported behaviors at 6- and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: At exit interview, Groups II and III reported that less alcohol was needed for impaired thinking and a greater intent to drink alcohol in the next 3 months than Group I. At 6 months, Group III reported more resistance to peer pressure to drink, and Groups II and III reported more bingeing than Group I. At 1-year follow-up, controlling for baseline levels, Groups II (odds ratio [OR], 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-6.24) and III (OR, 2.86; CI, 1.13-7.26) reported more bingeing in the last 3 months than Group I. Group II reported more drinking in the last 30 days (OR, 2.31; CI, 1.31-4.07) and in the last 3 months (OR, 1.76; CI, 1.12-2.77) than Group I. CONCLUSION: Brief office-based interventions were ineffective in reducing adolescent alcohol use but may increase adolescent reporting of alcohol use.

Effect of patient priming and primary care provider prompting on adolescent-provider communication about alcohol.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether priming adolescent patients to discuss alcohol with their primary care providers and prompting providers to discuss alcohol increases adolescent-provider communication about alcohol. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Five managed care group practices in Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients aged 12 to 17 years who were seeing primary care providers (n = 26) for health checkups. Of 892 eligible adolescents, 444 (50%) were randomized and completed data collection. Most adolescents (80%) were African American, 55% were male, and 17% currently drank alcohol. INTERVENTION: Usual care (group 1) vs adolescent priming with alcohol self-assessment and education just before their health checkups (group 2) vs adolescent priming and provider prompting with the adolescent's self-assessment and a patient education brochure (group 3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This exploratory substudy of a longitudinal study on adolescent alcohol behaviors examined adolescent-provider communication by adolescent exit survey, researcher observation, and audiotapes of a subsample of visits. RESULTS: More adolescents in group 3 (96%) than group 1 (87%) reported that their provider talked about alcohol (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.17). More adolescents in group 3 (18%) than group 1 (10%) reported asking about alcohol (adjusted OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16). The mean +/- SD number of minutes adolescents were with their providers without parents being present was greater for group 3 (10.8 +/- 7.6) than group 1 (8.8 +/- 8.0). Adolescents in group 2 spent more time with their provider and reported initiating more discussion not specific to alcohol than did group 1 adolescents. CONCLUSION: Adolescent priming and provider prompting increases adolescent-provider communication about alcohol.