Assessment of laser-assisted delivery vs intralesional injection of botulinum toxin A in treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids.

Keloids and hypertrophic scars could impair the psychological, physical, and cosmetic aspects of the patient's quality of life. Unfortunately, there is no curative treatment available till now. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intralesional vs topical botulinum toxin A combined with Fractional CO2 laser in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Twenty patients with Keloids and hypertrophic scars were enrolled in the study. Each scar was divided into two halves, one subjected to intralesional injection of botulinum toxin type A once a month for 4 months and the other was subjected to four sessions of CO2 laser therapy at 1 month interval followed by topical application of botulinum toxin A. Significant improvement was noted in Vancouver Scar Scale in hypertrophic scars in laser group than intralesional botulinum toxin A. In keloid cases, the improvement was significantly higher with intralesional botulinum toxin A. Clinical improvement showed significant negative correlation with scar duration and size. Botulinum toxin A is a promising treatment for hypertrophic scars and keloids. The use of fractional CO2 laser as a mode of delivery enhanced the efficacy of botox in hypertrophic scars.

Assessment of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in patients with verruca vulgaris.

BACKGROUND: Common warts are caused by human papillomaviruses (HPVs), they are among the most common cutaneous viral infections. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is an essential contributor in many inflammatory and immune skin diseases. Yet, its role in the pathology of common warts is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess MIF levels in lesional and perilesional skin in patients with common warts in comparison to apparently healthy control group with matching age and sex. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A case-control study performed on 60 patients with common warts (group A) and 30 age and sex matching healthy controls (group B). Two biopsies were taken from each patient in group A; one from the lesion (lesional) and the other one from the skin around the wart (perilesional), while biopsies of controls were taken from matched sites to patients. Measurement of MIF in all groups was done by quantitative ELISA kits. RESULTS: Significant high MIF levels were detected in lesional and perilesional skin biopsies compared to controls (P<0.001). Yet, the difference in MIF levels between lesional and perilesional skin biopsy was non-significant. No significant relations were found between lesional and perilesional MIF levels and clinical characteristics of the studied patients while both lesional and perilesional MIF levels were significantly correlated (rh=0.269, P=0.021). CONCLUSION: The significantly elevated MIF levels in lesional and perilesional skin biopsies compared to controls point to its role in wart progression from HPV infected cells.