Postdischarge antibiotic use for prophylaxis following spinal fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Despite recommendations to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics after incision closure or <24 hours after surgery, prophylactic antibiotics are continued after discharge by some clinicians. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use after spinal fusion. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: This study included patients aged ≥18 years undergoing spinal fusion or refusion between July 2011 and June 2015 at 3 sites. Patients with an infection during the surgical admission were excluded. METHODS: Prophylactic antibiotics were identified at discharge. Factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use were identified using hierarchical generalized linear models. RESULTS: In total, 8,652 spinal fusion admissions were included. Antibiotics were prescribed at discharge in 289 admissions (3.3%). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (22.1%), cephalexin (18.8%), and ciprofloxacin (17.1%). Adjusted for study site, significant factors associated with prophylactic discharge antibiotics included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥3 (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00-1.70), lymphoma (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.11-5.98), solid tumor (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.62-8.14), morbid obesity (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.09-2.47), paralysis (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.30-4.37), hematoma/seroma (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.17-7.33), thoracic surgery (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.93), longer length of stay, and intraoperative antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics were uncommon after spinal fusion. Patient and perioperative factors were associated with continuation of prophylactic antibiotics after hospital discharge.

Assessment of percent positive agreement between fluorescent marker and ATPase for environmental cleaning monitoring during sequential application in an intensive care unit.

Terminal room cleaning is critical in preventing pathogen transmission; however, the optimal cleaning effectiveness assessment modality is still being investigated. We sequentially compared cleanliness assessment agreement between a fluorescent marker and an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence method, finding no significant differences between modalities.

A Clinical Decision Tree to Predict Whether a Bacteremic Patient Is Infected With an Extended-Spectrum ß-Lactamase-Producing Organism.

BACKGROUND: Timely identification of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) bacteremia can improve clinical outcomes while minimizing unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, including carbapenems. However, most clinical microbiology laboratories currently require at least 24 additional hours from the time of microbial genus and species identification to confirm ESBL production. Our objective was to develop a user-friendly decision tree to predict which organisms are ESBL producing, to guide appropriate antibiotic therapy. METHODS: We included patients ≥18 years of age with bacteremia due to Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species from October 2008 to March 2015 at Johns Hopkins Hospital. Isolates with ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations ≥2 µg/mL underwent ESBL confirmatory testing. Recursive partitioning was used to generate a decision tree to determine the likelihood that a bacteremic patient was infected with an ESBL producer. Discrimination of the original and cross-validated models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and by calculation of C-statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1288 patients with bacteremia met eligibility criteria. For 194 patients (15%), bacteremia was due to a confirmed ESBL producer. The final classification tree for predicting ESBL-positive bacteremia included 5 predictors: history of ESBL colonization/infection, chronic indwelling vascular hardware, age ≥43 years, recent hospitalization in an ESBL high-burden region, and ≥6 days of antibiotic exposure in the prior 6 months. The decision tree's positive and negative predictive values were 90.8% and 91.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a clinical decision tree can be used to estimate a bacteremic patient's likelihood of infection with ESBL-producing bacteria. Recursive partitioning offers a practical, user-friendly approach for addressing important diagnostic questions.

Effect of reduced vancomycin susceptibility on clinical and economic outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) may lead to poor clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of RVS in patients with bacteremia due to S. aureus. A cohort study of patients who were hospitalized from December 2007 to May 2009 with S. aureus bacteremia was conducted within a university health system. Multivariable logistic regression and zero-truncated negative binomial regression models were developed to evaluate the association of RVS with 30-day in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. One hundred thirty-four (34.2%) of a total of 392 patients had bacteremia due to S. aureus with RVS as defined by a vancomycin Etest MIC of >1.0 µg/ml. Adjusted risk factors for 30-day in-hospital mortality included the all patient refined-diagnosis related group (APRDRG) risk-of-mortality score (odds ratio [OR], 7.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04 to 16.6), neutropenia (OR, 13.4; 95% CI, 2.46 to 73.1), white blood cell count (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.09), immunosuppression (OR, 6.31; 95% CI, 1.74 to 22.9), and intensive care unit location (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.65 to 7.49). In multivariable analyses, RVS was significantly associated with increased mortality in patients with S. aureus bacteremia as a result of methicillin-susceptible (OR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.07 to 14.2) but not methicillin-resistant (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.46) isolates. RVS was associated with greater 30-day in-hospital mortality in patients with bacteremia due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus but not methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies to reduce mortality associated with RVS in S. aureus bacteremia.