Economic evaluation of a person-centred care intervention in head and neck oncology: results from a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Head and neck cancer and its treatment deteriorate quality of life, but symptoms improve with person-centred care. We examined the cost-effectiveness of a person-centred care intervention versus standard medical care. METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial of a person-centred intervention, patients were planned for outpatient oncology treatment in a Swedish university hospital between 2012 and 2014 and were followed during 1 year. Annual healthcare costs were identified from medical records and administrative register data. Productivity costs were calculated from reported sick leave. Health-related quality of life was collected using the EuroQol Group's five-dimension health state questionnaire. RESULTS: Characteristics were similar between 53 patients in the intervention group and 39 control patients. The average total cost was Euro (EUR) 55,544 (95% confidence interval: EUR 48,474-62,614) in the intervention group and EUR 57,443 (EUR 48,607-66,279) among controls, with similar health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This person-centred intervention did not result in increased costs and dominated the standard medical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT02982746).

Cost-effectiveness analysis of surgical versus non-surgical management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.

PURPOSE: An Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury that typically affects people in the middle of their working lives. The injury has a negative impact in terms of both morbidity for the individual and the risk of substantial sick leave. The aim of this study was to investigate the cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical management in patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture. METHODS: One hundred patients (86 men, 14 women; mean age, 40 years) with an acute Achilles tendon rupture were randomised (1:1) to either surgical treatment or non-surgical treatment, both with an accelerated rehabilitation protocol (surgical n = 49, non-surgical n = 51). One of the surgical patients was excluded due to a partial re-rupture and five surgical patients were lost to the 1-year economic follow-up. One patient was excluded due to incorrect inclusion and one was lost to the 1-year follow-up in the non-surgical group. The cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. The direct cost is the actual cost of health care, whereas the indirect cost is the production loss related to the impact of the patient's injury in terms of lost ability to work. The health benefits were assessed using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Sampling uncertainty was assessed by means of non-parametric boot-strapping. RESULTS: Pre-injury, the groups were comparable in terms of demographic data and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The mean cost of surgical management was €7332 compared with €6008 for non-surgical management (p = 0.024). The mean number of QALYs during the 1-year time period was 0.89 and 0.86 in the surgical and non-surgical groups respectively. The (incremental) cost-effectiveness ratio was €45,855. Based on bootstrapping, the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve shows that the surgical treatment is 57% likely to be cost-effective at a threshold value of €50,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment was more expensive compared with non-surgical management. The cost-effectiveness results give a weak support (57% likelihood) for the surgical treatment to be cost-effective at a willingness to pay per QALY threshold of €50,000. This is support for surgical treatment; however, additionally cost-effectiveness studies alongside RCTs are important to clarify which treatment option is preferred from a cost-effectiveness perspective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Cost description of clinical examination and MRI in wrist ligament injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The total number and cost of wrist MRIs in the catchment area of the Västra Götaland Region in Sweden (population 1 723 000) during 1 year was analysed, together with the number and content of referrals. METHODS: Six radiology departments reported the numbers and rate of all MRI investigations intended to diagnose wrist ligament injuries (n = 411) and other injuries to the wrist. RESULTS: The additional cost of the difference between MRIs and a clinical examination by a hand surgeon, plus indirect costs for patients with suspected wrist ligament injuries, was calculated as 957 000 euros. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that MRI should only be used in patients in whom there are clinical difficulties in terms of diagnosing wrist ligament injuries. It is suggested that patients with suspected wrist ligament injuries should be referred directly to an experienced hand surgeon, capable of performing a standardised wrist examination and, when needed, diagnostic arthroscopy and final treatment. The proposed algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of suspected wrist ligament injuries presented in the present study could save time for the patient and for the radiology departments, as well as reducing costs. The ability to implement the early and appropriate treatment of acute ligament injuries could be improved at the same time.