Infection control practice in the operating room: staff adherence to existing policies in a developing country.

CONTEXT: Infection control interventions are important for containing surgery-related infections. For this reason, the modern operating room (OR) should have well-developed infection control policies. The efficacy of these policies depends on how well the OR staff adhere to them. There is a lack of available data documenting adherence to infection control policies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate OR staff adherence to existing infection control policies in Jamaica. METHODS: We administered a questionnaire to all OR staff to assess their training, knowledge of local infection control protocols, and practice with regard to 8 randomly selected guidelines. Adherence to each guideline was rated with fixed-choice items on a 4-point Likert scale. The sum of points determined the adherence score. Two respondent groups were defined: adherent (score > 26) and nonadherent (score ≤ 26). We evaluated the relationship between respondent group and age, sex, occupational rank, and time since completion of basic medical training. We used χ(2) and Fisher exact tests to assess associations and t tests to compare means between variables of interest. RESULTS: The sample comprised 132 participants (90 physicians and 42 nurses) with a mean age of 36 (standard deviation ± 9.5) years. Overall, 40.1% were adherent to existing protocols. There was no significant association between the distribution of adherence scores and sex (p = 0.319), time since completion of basic training (p = 0.595), occupational rank (p = 0.461), or age (p = 0.949).Overall, 19% felt their knowledge of infection control practices was inadequate. Those with working knowledge of infection control practices attained it mostly through informal communication (80.4%) and self-directed research (62.6%). CONCLUSION: New approaches to the problem of nonadherence to infection control guidelines are needed in the Caribbean. Several unique cultural, financial, and environmental factors influence adherence in this region, in contrast to conditions in developed countries.

Cost-benefit comparison of hemodialysis access creation in a developing country and North American centres.

OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that vascular access operations should only be performed in high-volume centres to ensure good outcomes. Vascular access operations have been routinely performed in the Cayman Islands since 2005. However, with an estimated population of 45,000 persons, only a small number of patients require vascular access in any given interval. A cost-benefit analysis of this practice was performed. METHODS: All patients who had vascular access operations over four years were retrospectively identified. Two groups were defined - the local group, who had operations performed by surgeons in the Cayman Islands, and the offshore group, who were transferred off the island and had operations overseas. Cumulative cost, morbidity, patency and failure rates were compared. Significance was considered present with a two-tailed P≤0.05. RESULTS: There were 14 patients in the local group and 22 in the offshore group. The mean cost of access creation was 6.9 times greater in the offshore group (US$26,883.36 versus US$3,913.33; P<0.001). The likelihood of the use of arteriovenous grafts was significantly greater in the offshore group (P=0.04). When therapeutic outcomes were compared, there were no differences in primary or secondary failure, primary or secondary patency, or overall access-specific morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: In the present setting, vascular access creation exceeded all the goals set by the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative and the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative. Compared with overseas centres, this is being achieved at a significantly lower cost, with a greater likelihood of native fistula use and similar therapeutic outcomes.