Significance of Skeletal Muscle Loss in Liver Hypertrophy in Patients Undergoing Portal Vein Embolization Before Major Hepatectomy: Assessment With Body Composition and Nutritional Indicators.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The relationship between body composition including skeletal muscle and liver hypertrophy initiated by portal vein embolization (PVE) for major hepatectomy has not been clarified. This study aimed to investigate the effects of skeletal muscle, body adipose, and nutritional indicators on liver hypertrophy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients who underwent PVE scheduled for major right-sided hepatectomy were included. The skeletal muscle area of L3 as skeletal muscle index was calculated. The relationship between skeletal muscle loss and clinical variables was assessed. We also evaluated the relationship between >30% liver growth or >12% liver growth/week after PVE. RESULTS: Skeletal muscle loss was observed in 39 patients (66.1%) and associated with zinc deficiency, visceral adipose index, liver growth rate, and liver growth rate/week. Multivariate analysis indicated that future liver volume and skeletal muscle index were associated with >30% liver growth, and functional future liver volume and skeletal muscle index were associated with >12% liver growth/week. CONCLUSION: Loss of skeletal muscle, and a small future remnant liver volume, attenuates liver hypertrophy initiated by PVE. Strength building and nutritional supplementation may have positive effects on liver hypertrophy after PVE.

A prospective study of sequential hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization in patients scheduled for right-sided major hepatectomy: Results of feasibility and surgical strategy using functional liver assessment.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic vein embolization (HVE) added to portal vein embolization (PVE) can further increase future remnant liver volume (FRLV) compared with PVE alone. This study was aimed to evaluate feasibility of sequential HVE in a prospective trial and to verify surgical strategy using functional FRLV (fFRLV). METHODS: Hepatic vein embolization was prospectively indicated for post-PVE patients scheduled for right-sided major hepatectomy if the resection limit of fFRLV using EOB-magnetic resonance imaging was not satisfied. The resection limit was fFRLV: 615 mL/m2 for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure. Patients who underwent sequential PVE-HVE (n = 12) were compared with those who underwent PVE alone (n = 31). RESULTS: All patients underwent HVE with no severe complications. Median fFRLV increased from 396 (range: 251-581) to 634 (range: 422-740) mL/m2 by sequential PVE-HVE. From PVE to HVE, both of FRLV (P < .001) and fFRLV (P = .005) significantly increased. The increased width of fFRLV was larger than that of FRLV after performing HVE. Median growth rate was 71.3 (range: 33.3-80.3) %, which was higher than that of PVE alone (27.0%, range: 6.0-78.0). All-cohort resection rate was 88.3%. Strategy of using fFRLV for the resection limit and performing HVE in patients with insufficient functional volume resulted in no liver failure in all patients who underwent hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential HVE after PVE is feasible and safe, and HVE induced possibility of further liver growth and its functional improvement. Our surgical strategy using fFRLV may be justified.

Prediction with functional liver volume assessment to achieve the resection limit after portal vein embolization in patients scheduled major hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) stimulates liver hypertrophy and improves the safety of major hepatectomy. It is essential to predict the future remnant liver volume (FRLV) and resection limit following PVE. Previously, we reported that evaluating functional FRLV (fFRLV) using EOB-MRI could predict post-hepatectomy liver failure. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of fFRLV in predicting the achieving of adequate resection limit for safe hepatectomy following PVE. METHODS: We included 55 patients who underwent PVE and were scheduled for major hepatectomy. We calculated the liver-to-muscle ratio in the remnant liver and fFRLV using EOB-MRI. We investigated the pre-PVE variables in determining the nonachievement of the resection limit. RESULTS: The median observation period between PVE and the first evaluation was 21 days, and the median growth rate of FRLV was 26.4%. In 54.5% of patients, the resection limit of fFRLV (615 mL/m2) was achieved. In logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic analyses, pre-PVE fFRLV (p < 0.001, area under the curve: 0.852) was the reliable predictor of achieving the resection limit; the cutoff value of pre-PVE fFRLV was 446 mL/m2. CONCLUSION: Pre-PVE fFRLV can be useful in predicting the achievement of adequate resection limit following PVE.

Efficiency of regional functional liver volume assessment using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether functional future remnant liver volume (fFRLV), assessed using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI), could evaluate regional liver function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and help establish the indication for hepatectomy. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 12 patients with PVTT [PVTT(+) group] and 58 patients without PVTT [PVTT(-) group], from among 191 patients who underwent hepatectomy of more than one segment for HCC. We calculated the liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR) in the remnant liver, using EOB-MRI and fFRLV. Preoperative factors and surgical outcome were compared between the groups. The LMR of the area occluded by PVTT was compared with that of the non-occluded area. RESULTS: The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15) and liver fibrosis indices were increased in the PVTT(+) group, but the surgical outcomes of patients in this group were acceptable, with no liver failure, no mortality, and no differences from those in the PVTT(-) group. The fFRLV in the PVTT(+) group was not significantly different from that in the PVTT(-) group (p = 0.663). The LMR was significantly lower in the occluded area than in the non-occluded area (p = 0.004), indicating decreased liver function. CONCLUSION: Assessing fFRLV using EOB-MRI could be useful for evaluating regional liver function and establishing operative indications for HCC with PVTT.

Functional remnant liver assessment predicts liver-related morbidity after hepatic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate whether functional assessment of the future remnant liver is a predictor of postoperative morbidity after hepatic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: One hundred forty-six patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC were enrolled in this study. Gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced MRI (EOB-MRI) analysis for functional liver assessment was carried out before hepatic resection. The signal intensity in the remnant liver was measured and divided by the signal intensity of the major psoas muscle (the liver to major psoas muscle ratio, LMR) for standardization. The remnant liver function was calculated using the formula (LMR on the hepatobiliary phase/LMR on the precontrast image). Computed tomography liver volumetry was also carried out. The remnant functional liver was calculated as the remnant liver volume or volumetric rate × remnant liver function by EOB-MRI. RESULTS: Morbidities developed in 19 (13.0%) patients. Morbidities associated with the liver occurred in 7 patients (4.7%). There was no mortality during surgery. Median remnant liver function scores using EOB-MRI and remnant functional liver using volumetric rate or volumetry were 1.82 (range, 1.25-2.96), 155.9 (range, 64.7-285.3), and 1027 (range, 369-2148), respectively. Logistic regression analysis identified the remnant functional liver volume as the only independent predictor for liver-related morbidity. CONCLUSION: Remnant functional liver volume using computed tomography liver volumetry and EOB-MRI was a significantly useful predictor for liver-related morbidity after hepatic resection in patients with HCC.