RESUMO
Oral anticancer medications (OAMs) are increasingly utilized. We evaluated the representativeness and completeness of IQVIA, a large aggregator of pharmacy data, for breast cancer, colon cancer, chronic myeloid leukemia, and myeloma cases diagnosed in six Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) registries between 2007 and 2011. Patient's SEER and SEER-Medicare data were linked and compared with IQVIA pharmacy data from 2006 to 2012 for specific OAMs. Overall, 67.6% of SEER cases had a pharmacy claim in IQVIA during the treatment assessment window. This varied by location, race and ethnicity, and insurance status. IQVIA consistently identified fewer cases who received an OAM of interest than SEER-Medicare. The difference was least pronounced for breast cancer agents and most pronounced for myeloma agents. The IQVIA pharmacy database included a large portion of persons in the SEER areas. Future studies should assess receipt of OAMs for other cancer sites and in different SEER registries.
Assuntos
Big Data , Neoplasias , Farmácia , Programa de SEER , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Late stage of cancer at diagnosis is an important predictor of cancer mortality. In many areas worldwide, cancer registry systems, available data and mapping technologies can provide information about late stage cancer by geographical regions, offering valuable opportunities to identify areas where further investigation and interventions are needed. The current study examined geographical variation in late stage breast cancer incidence across eight states in the United States with the objective to identify areas that might benefit from targeted interventions. METHODS: Data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program on late stage breast cancer incidence was used as dependent variable in regression analysis and certain factors known to contribute to high rates of late stage cancer (socioeconomic characteristics, health insurance characteristics, and the availability and utilization of cancer screening) as covariates. Geographic information systems were used to map and highlight areas that have any combination of high late stage breast cancer incidence and significantly associated risk factors. RESULTS: The differences in mean rates of late stage breast cancer between eight states considered in this analysis are statistically significant. Factors that have statistically negative association with late stage breast cancer incidence across the eight states include: density of mammography facilities, percent population with Bachelor's degree and English literacy while percent black population has statistically significant positive association with late stage breast cancer incidence. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes geographic disparities in late stage breast cancer incidence and identifies areas that might benefit from targeted interventions. The results suggest that in the eight US states examined, higher rates of late stage breast cancer are more common in areas with predominantly black population, where English literacy, percentage of population with college degree and screening availability are low. The approach described in this work may be utilized both within and outside US, wherever cancer registry systems and technologies offer the same opportunity to identify places where further investigation and interventions for reducing cancer burden are needed.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Vigilância de Evento Sentinela , Feminino , Sistemas de Informação Geográfica , Humanos , Incidência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Existing comorbidity indices were not developed for adolescent and young adults (AYA) 15 to 39 years of age. The aim of this study was to assess impact of comorbidities on health care service needs and health status among AYA cancer survivors using the newly developed AYA HOPE comorbidity index in comparison with the existing indices. METHODS: Data on comorbid conditions were obtained from medical records and service needs and health status were from a survey of AYA cancer survivors. Prevalence of comorbidities was based on the AYA HOPE index. Charlson and NCI indices were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was used. RESULTS: Of the 485 patients, 14.6% had ≥2 comorbidities based on the AYA HOPE Index. Prevalence of mental illness and obesity/overweight, which were not included in existing indices, were 8.2% and 5.8%, respectively. Prevalence of cardiovascular, endocrine, gastrointestinal, and neurologic conditions were higher with the AYA HOPE Index than the other two indices. Forty percent of AYA patients reported service needs, particularly for mental health services (25.2%) and support groups (17.7%). Having ≥2 comorbidities on the AYA index was associated with higher mental health service needs [OR, 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-3.82] adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Comorbidities were associated with fair/poor self-reported health status. CONCLUSION: The AYA HOPE Index is a more comprehensive comorbidity index for AYA cancer patients than existing indices, and the number of comorbidities is associated with service needs and health status. IMPACT: The AYA HOPE index could identify patients' additional service needs early in therapy.
Assuntos
Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Comorbidade , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Qualidade de Vida , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Although the incidence and mortality of colon cancer in the United States has declined over the past two decades, blacks have worse outcomes than whites. Variations in treatment may contribute to mortality differentials. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer were randomly sampled from the SEER program from the years 1990, 1991, 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010. Patients were categorized as non-Hispanic white (n = 835) or black (n = 384). Treatment data were obtained from a review of the medical records, and these data were verified through contact with the original treating physicians. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate the association between race and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Effect modification by insurance was assessed with use of single referent models. RESULTS: Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy among both white and black patients increased from the period encompassing the years 1990 and 1991 (white, 58%; black, 45%) to the year 2005 (white, 72%; black, 71%) and then decreased in the year 2010 (white, 66%; black, 57%). There were marked racial disparities in the time period of 1990 to 1991 and again in 2010, with black patients less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy as compared with white patients (risk ratio [RR], .82; 95% CI, .72 to .93). For black patients, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy did not differ across insurance categories (RR for private insurance, .80; 95% CI, .69 to .93; RR for Medicare, .84; 95% CI, .69 to 1.02; and RR for Medicaid, .84; 95% CI, .69 to 1.02), although a larger proportion had Medicaid in all years of the study as compared with white patients. CONCLUSION: The chemotherapy differential narrowed after the time period of 1990 to 1991, but our findings suggest that the disparity reemerged in 2010. Recent decreases in chemotherapy use may be due, in part, to the economic downturn and an increase in Medicaid coverage.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Colo/etnologia , Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias do Colo/economia , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Razão de Chances , Risco , Programa de SEER , Estudos de Amostragem , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence is expected to rise dramatically over the next decades because of increasing hepatitis C infections and obesity-related comorbidities. However, little information exists regarding the treatment of patients with HCC in the community setting. The purpose of this article was to characterize patterns of diagnosis, treatment, and survival for HCC in the community. METHODS: We identified 946 HCC patients in the 2007 National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care study. Chi-square analyses and multivariable regression were used to examine patient and provider factors associated with treatment and survival by stage at diagnosis. RESULTS: Our primary findings indicate that liver transplants, embolization, or radiofrequency ablation for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A patients were performed significantly less often for non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, patients in the highest income quartile, and patients with Medicaid. Patients with stage D disease were less likely to receive cancer therapy if they had Medicaid insurance compared to private insurance (p<0.001 for all). In multivariable analyses, all-cause mortality was associated with treatment in a hospital without a residency training program (hazard ratio [HR] 1.4 [1.1,1.9]), more advanced stage (HR: 10.6 [5.7, 19.5] stage D vs. A), and lack of appropriate treatment (HR: 2.4 [1.9,3.2]). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first population-based study to evaluate therapy provided for HCC in the community. Current therapy depended on patients' HCC stage at diagnosis and other clinical and demographic factors. Overall, our study identifies those least likely to receive specific therapies in a variety of health care settings and can inform strategies for promoting appropriate therapy now and as new agents are developed.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) annually confirms therapy with treating physicians on a sample of patients diagnosed with a specific cancer. METHODS: Using the NCI Patterns of Care data, treatment patterns were examined on a population-based sample of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) in 2008. RESULTS: A random sample of 323 of 405 GIST patients registered in SEER was selected. Most patients had gastric GISTs, were ≥ 65 years, white, had private insurance, and treated in a hospital with a residency program. Surgery was primarily performed in patients with non-metastatic disease (94%), in which: 26, 12, and 36% were at low, intermediate, and high-risk of recurrence, respectively. Amongst low-risk patients, â¼ 30% received adjuvant therapy. Amongst patients at higher risk, 26-40% did not receive adjuvant therapy. Imatinib was the most common targeted therapy administered. On multivariate analysis, age and risk-group were associated with receipt of adjuvant targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that in 2008, the majority of patients diagnosed with GIST received appropriate surgical and adjuvant therapies. However, a considerable subset may have been overtreated and undertreated. Future studies identifying factors that impact the delivery of adjuvant therapy should be conducted.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/terapia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Programa de SEER , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Medicare beneficiaries with cancer bear a greater portion of their health care costs, because cancer treatment costs have increased. Beneficiaries have supplemental insurance to reduce out-of-pocket costs; those without supplemental insurance may face barriers to care. This study examines the association between type of supplemental insurance coverage and receipt of chemotherapy among Medicare patients with cancer who, per National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines, should generally receive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included 1,200 Medicare patients diagnosed with incident cancer of the breast (stage IIB to III), colon (stage III), rectum (stage II to III), lung (stage II to IV), or ovary (stage II to IV) from 2000 to 2005. Using the National Cancer Institute Patterns of Care Studies and linked SEER-Medicare data, we determined each Medicare patient's supplemental insurance status (private insurance, dual eligible [ie, Medicare with Medicaid], or no supplemental insurance), consultation with an oncologist, and receipt of chemotherapy. Using adjusted logistic regression, we evaluated the association of type of supplemental insurance with oncologist consultation and receipt of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Dual-eligible patients were significantly less likely to receive chemotherapy than were Medicare patients with private insurance. Patients with Medicare only who saw an oncologist had comparable rates of chemotherapy compared with Medicare patients with private insurance. CONCLUSION: Dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries received recommended cancer chemotherapy less frequently than other Medicare beneficiaries. With the increasing number of Medicaid patients under the Affordable Care Act, there will be a need for patient navigators and sufficient physician reimbursement so that low-income patients with cancer will have access to oncologists and needed treatment.
Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Medicare Part B/economia , Medicare/economia , Neoplasias/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Animais , Feminino , Gastos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid/economia , Análise Multivariada , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Encaminhamento e Consulta/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Young adults have historically been the least likely to have health insurance in the United States. Previous studies of survivors of childhood cancer found lower rates of insurance and less access to medical care compared with siblings; however, to the authors' knowledge, no studies to date have examined continuity of insurance after a cancer diagnosis in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). METHODS: Using the AYA Health Outcomes and Patient Experience study, a cohort of 465 individuals aged 15 to 39 years from participating Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries, we evaluated changes in and sponsors of health insurance coverage after diagnosis, coverage of physician-recommended tests, and factors associated with lack of insurance after a cancer diagnosis using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Greater than 25% of AYA survivors of cancer (118 survivors) experienced some period without insurance up to 35 months after diagnosis. Insurance rates were high in the initial year after diagnosis (6 months-14 months; 93.3%) but decreased substantially at follow-up (15 months-35 months; 85.2%). The most common sponsor of health insurance was employer/school coverage (43.7%). Multivariable analysis indicated that older survivors (those aged 25-39 years vs 15-19 years; odds ratio, 3.35 [P < .01]) and those with less education (high school or less vs college graduate; odds ratio, 2.80 [P < .01]) were more likely to experience a period without insurance after diagnosis. Furthermore, > 20% of survivors indicated there were physician-recommended tests/treatments that were not covered by insurance, but > 80% received them regardless of coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance rates appear to decrease with time since diagnosis in AYA survivors of cancer. Future studies should examine how new policies under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act extend access and insurance coverage beyond initial treatment.
Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Neoplasias/economia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Programa de SEER , Sobreviventes , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors experience barriers to utilizing healthcare, but the determinants of cancer-related medical care of AYAs has not been fully explored. METHODS: We studied factors associated with medical care utilization among 465 AYA cancer survivors in the AYA Health Outcomes and Patient Experience Study, a cohort of 15 to 39 year olds recently diagnosed with germ cell cancer, lymphoma, sarcoma, or acute lymphocytic leukemia. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression methods were used. RESULTS: Most AYA cancer survivors (95%), who were 15-35 months post diagnosis, received medical care in the past 12 months and 17% were undergoing cancer treatment. In multivariate analyses, compared with AYAs with no cancer-related medical visits in the previous year, AYAs receiving cancer-related care were more likely to currently have health insurance (odds ratio (OR) = 4.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-13.8) or have had health insurance in the past year (OR = 4.0; 95% CI = 0.99-16.3). Cancer recurrence, lacking employment, and negative changes in self-reported general health were associated with ongoing cancer treatment versus other cancer-related medical care. Eleven percent of all AYAs and 25% of AYAs who did not receive medical care in the past 12 months lost health insurance between the initial and follow-up surveys. CONCLUSION: AYA cancer survivors with health insurance were much more likely to receive cancer-related medical care than those without insurance. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Despite the need for post-treatment medical care, lacking health insurance is a barrier to receiving any medical care among AYAs.
Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/terapia , Sobreviventes , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Despite improved outcomes for multiple myeloma, little is known about changes in initial treatment at the population level for US patients. We report trends in treatment practices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 1,976) with newly diagnosed myeloma in 1999, 2003, and 2007 were examined by using the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care Studies. We assessed use of common chemotherapies (melphalan, vincristine, and doxorubicin), novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib, or lenalidomide), or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) during the first year after diagnosis. By using logistic regression, we evaluated the association of race and insurance status with receipt of high-cost treatments--transplantation or novel agents. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2007, use of melphalan alone dropped from 32.0% to 4.1%, and vincristine and doxorubicin use declined from 18.2% to 0.4%. The percentage of patients receiving any novel agent rose from 3.9% in 1999 to 75.5% in 2007. HSCT increased from 11.1% in 1999 to 21.7% in 2007. For white patients, use of novel agents was lower for those with Medicare only (42.6%) than for those with private insurance (50.2%). For patients of other races, those with Medicare only or Medicaid were less likely to receive novel agents or transplantation compared with those with private insurance. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment for multiple myeloma has changed markedly. Most patients now receive novel agents, with a decline in the use of traditional chemotherapy. Use of transplantation and novel agents varies with race and insurance. These findings document rapid changes in patterns of care and highlight addressable disparities in myeloma care.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Seguro Saúde , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Mieloma Múltiplo/economia , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Adulto , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/economia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/economia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/tendências , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/cirurgia , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER , Transplante Autólogo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Vincristina/administração & dosagem , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Large health care databases are increasingly used to examine the dissemination and benefits and harms of chemotherapy treatment in routine practice, particularly among patients excluded from trials (eg, the elderly). Misclassification of chemotherapy could bias estimates of frequency and association, warranting an updated assessment. METHODS: We evaluated the validity of Medicare claims to identify receipt of chemotherapy and specific agents delivered to elderly stage II/III colorectal (CRC), in situ/early-stage breast, non-small-cell lung, and ovarian cancer patients using the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care studies (POC) as the gold standard. The POC collected data on chemotherapy treatment by reabstracting hospital records, contacting physicians, and reviewing medical records. Patients' POC data were linked and compared with their Medicare claims for 2 to 12 months postdiagnosis. κ, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the receipt of any chemotherapy and specific agents. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of Medicare claims to identify any chemotherapy were high across all cancer sites. We found substantial variation in validity across agents, by site and administration modality. Capecitabine, an oral CRC treatment, was identified in claims with high specificity (98%) but low sensitivity (47%), whereas oxaliplatin, an intravenously administered CRC agent had higher sensitivity (75%) and similar specificity (97%). CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of chemotherapy and specific intravenous agents can be identified using Medicare claims, showing improvement from prior reports; yet, variation exists. Future studies should assess newly approved agents and the impact of coverage decisions for these agents under the Medicare Part D program.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Programa de SEER , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend that women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer receive endocrine therapy (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs] or aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for five years following diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine utilization and adherence to therapy for SERMs and AIs in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. DATA: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 15,542 elderly women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in years 2003-2005 (the latest SEER data at the time of the study) and enrolled in a Part D plan in 2006 or 2007 (the initial years of Part D). This permitted us to compare utilization and adherence to therapy at various points within the recommended five-year timeframe for endocrine therapy. SERM and AI use was measured from claim records. Non-adherence to therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio of less than 80 percent. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Between May 2006 and December 2007, 22 percent of beneficiaries received SERM, 52 percent AI, and 26 percent received neither. The percent receiving any endocrine therapy decreased with time from diagnosis. Among SERM and AI users, 20-30 percent were non-adherent to therapy; out-of-pocket costs were higher for AI than SERM and were strongly associated with non-adherence. For AI users without a low income subsidy, adherence to therapy deteriorated after reaching the Part D coverage gap. CONCLUSIONS: Many elderly breast cancer patients were not receiving therapy for the recommended five years following diagnosis. Choosing a Part D plan that minimizes out-of-pocket costs is critical to ensuring beneficiary access to essential medications.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Medicare Part D/estatística & dados numéricos , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Inibidores da Aromatase/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/economia , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Financiamento Pessoal/economia , Financiamento Pessoal/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico/economia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
This study examined the physical and mental health of 126,685 males and females age 65 or over, with and without cancer that completed a Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) between 1998-2002. Cancer information was ascertained through the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and linked to MHOS data. Results indicated that across most cancer types, cancer patients reported significantly more comorbid conditions and poorer physical and mental health compared with patients without cancer. Negative associations were most pronounced in those with two or more comorbidities and in those diagnosed with cancer within the past year.
Assuntos
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/normas , Medicare/normas , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Registro Médico Coordenado , Neoplasias/classificação , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Distribuição de Poisson , Prevalência , Programa de SEER , Perfil de Impacto da Doença , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the Medicare managed care (MC) and fee-for-service (FFS) sectors on stage at diagnosis and treatment patterns for prostate, female breast, and colorectal cancers, and to examine patterns across MC plans. DATA: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data. METHODS: Among cases diagnosed at ages 65-79 between 1998 and 2002, we selected all MC enrollees (n = 42,467) and beneficiaries in FFS (n = 82,998) who resided in the same counties. MC and FFS samples were compared using logistic regression, adjusting for demographic, geographic, and clinical covariates. RESULTS: The percentage of late stage cases was similar in MC and FFS for prostate and colorectal cancers; there were slightly fewer late stage breast cancer cases in MC after adjustment (7.3% vs. 8.5%, P < 0.001). Within MC, radical prostatectomy was performed less frequently for clinically localized prostate cancer (18.3% vs. 22.4%, P < 0.0001), and 12 or more lymph nodes were examined less often for resected colon cancer cases (40.9% vs. 43.0%, P < 0.05). Treatment patterns for early stage breast cancer were similar in MC and FFS. Analyses of treatment patterns at the individual plan level revealed significant variation among plans, as well as within the FFS sector, for all 3 types of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: On average, there are few significant differences in cancer diagnosis and treatment between MC and FFS. Such comparisons, however, mask the wide variability among MC plans, as well as FFS providers. Observed variation in patterns of care may be related to patient selection, but can potentially lead to outcome differences. These findings support the need for quality measures to evaluate plan practices and performance.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part B , Medicare Part C , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/normas , Feminino , Geografia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/normas , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Vigilância da População , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Programa de SEER , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Identifying appropriate comorbidity data sources is a key consideration in health services and outcomes research. OBJECTIVE: Using cancer patients as an example, we compared comorbid conditions identified: 1) on the discharge facesheet versus full hospital medical record and 2) in the hospital record versus Medicare claims, both precancer diagnosis and associated with a cancer treatment-related index hospitalization. METHODS: We used data from 1995 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results patterns of care studies for 1,382 patients. Comorbid conditions were ascertained from the hospital record associated with the most definitive cancer treatment and Medicare claims. We calculated the prevalence for and assessed concordances among 12 conditions derived from the hospital record facesheet; full hospital record; Medicare claims precancer diagnosis, with and without a rule-out algorithm applied; and Medicare claims associated with an index hospitalization. RESULTS: The proportion of patients with one or more comorbid conditions varied by data source, from 21% for the facesheet to 85% for prediagnosis Medicare claims without the rule-out algorithm. Condition prevalences were substantially lower for the facesheet compared with the full hospital record. For prediagnosis Medicare claims, condition prevalences were more than 1.7 times greater in the absence of an algorithm to screen for rule-out diagnoses. Measures assessing concordance between the full hospital record and prediagnosis Medicare claims (rule-out algorithm applied) showed modest agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The hospital record and Medicare claims are complementary data sources for identifying comorbid conditions. Comorbidity is greatly underascertained when derived only from the facesheet of the hospital record. Investigators using Part B Medicare claims to measure comorbidity should remove conditions that are listed for purposes of generating bills but are not true comorbidities.
Assuntos
Comorbidade , Hospitais , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Auditoria Médica , Medicare , Neoplasias , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Programa de SEERRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study estimates the impact of type of insurance coverage on the receipt of guideline therapy in a population-based sample of cancer patients treated in the community. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 7,134) from the National Cancer Institute's Patterns of Care studies who were newly diagnosed with 11 different types of cancer were analyzed. The definition of guideline therapy was based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment recommendations. Insurance status was categorized as a mutually exclusive hierarchical variable (no insurance, any private insurance, any Medicaid, Medicare only, and all other). Multivariate analyses were used to examine the association between insurance and receipt of guideline therapy. RESULTS: Adjusting for clinical and nonclinical variables, insurance status was a modest, although statistically significant, determinant of receipt of guideline therapy, with 65% of the privately insured patients receiving recommended therapy compared with 60% of patients with Medicaid. Seventy percent of the uninsured patients received guideline therapy, which was nonsignificantly different compared with private insurance. When stratified by race, insurance was a statistically significant predictor of the receipt of guideline therapy only for non-Hispanic blacks. CONCLUSION: Overall, levels of guideline treatment were lower than expected and particularly low for patients with Medicaid or Medicare only. The use of guideline therapy for ovarian and cervical cancer patients and for patients with rectal cancers was unrelated to type of insurance. Of particular concern is the significantly lower use of guideline therapy for non-Hispanic black patients with Medicaid. After adjusting for other factors, only half of these patients received guideline therapy.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde , Neoplasias/economia , Neoplasias/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Programa de SEER/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The metabolic syndrome, associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, begins to develop during adolescence. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify early predictors of the presence of the syndrome at the ages of 18 and 19 years in black and white girls. METHODS: Using longitudinal data on participants from 2 centers in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study, a 10-year cohort study, we applied cutoffs from the Adult Treatment Panel III to document changes in the prevalence of abnormal syndrome elements and the syndrome in girls aged 9 and 10 years, when cases were rare, and those aged 18 and 19 years, when prevalence had reached 3%. Longitudinal regression models identified early predictors for the presence of the syndrome. RESULTS: Only 1 girl of each race had > or =3 factors at ages 9 and 10 (0.2%), but 20 black girls (3.5%) and 12 white girls (2.3%) had the syndrome 10 years later. Low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was prevalent throughout the period in both black and white girls. The prevalence of other variables was low at enrollment but increased during follow-up, except for abnormal triglyceride levels in black girls, which remained low throughout follow-up. In multivariate models, early measures of waist circumference and triglyceride level were significant predictors for development of the syndrome. CONCLUSION: The strong association of central adiposity with the development of the metabolic syndrome suggests that early interventions aimed at managing preteen obesity could reduce risk of developing the syndrome.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano , Síndrome Metabólica/etnologia , População Branca , Adolescente , Adulto , Glicemia/análise , Pressão Sanguínea , Índice de Massa Corporal , Criança , HDL-Colesterol/sangue , Feminino , Homeostase , Humanos , Resistência à Insulina , Estudos Longitudinais , Síndrome Metabólica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Metabólica/metabolismo , Prevalência , Triglicerídeos/sangueRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Medicare claims include codes for chemotherapy administration and specific drugs given, and researchers are increasingly using these data to measure the use of chemotherapy. However, the validity and completeness of these data as a source of information has not been established. OBJECTIVES: This analysis is intended to assess the utility of the Medicare claims to capture chemotherapy use. METHODS: Persons with breast, colorectal, and ovarian cancer were identified from the linked SEER-Medicare data. Their Medicare claims were reviewed to determine if there were any bills for chemotherapy, and if so, if there were claims for specific agents. This information was compared with data on the first course of treatment obtained from hospitals and treating physicians by the SEER registries through an NCI-supported Patterns of Care Studies (POC). Agreement was measured using kappa statistics. The sensitivity of the Medicare claims to capture chemotherapy, as reported from the POC data, was also measured. An additional comparison assessed the agreement between the two data sources concerning which specific drugs had been given. RESULTS: For all of the cancers, there was a high level of agreement between the Medicare claims and the POC data regarding whether or not the patient had received chemotherapy (kappa >or=0.73). The sensitivity of the Medicare data to determine if a person had received chemotherapy was high (>or=88%). In cases where the Medicare claim included a code for a specific drug, there high agreement between Medicare and POC about the specific drug given in breast and colorectal cancers, although the agreement was lower for ovarian cancers. The sensitivity of the Medicare claims to identify specific agents varies by cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: The Medicare claims can be used to identify which persons are receiving chemotherapy. The utility of Medicare data to measure treatment with specific agents varies by cancer type and specific agent. For some cancers, it is possible to use these claims to assess use of specific drugs, while for other drugs the data are limited.