Clinically Competent and Fiscally at Risk: Impact of Debt and Financial Parameters on the Surgical Resident.

BACKGROUND: While the costs of medical training continue to increase, surgeon income and personal financial decisions may be challenged to manage this expanding debt burden. We sought to characterize the financial liability, assets, income, and debt of surgical residents, and evaluate the necessity for additional financial training. STUDY DESIGN: All surgical trainees at a single academic center completed a detailed survey. Questions focused on issues related to debt, equity, cash flow, financial education, and fiscal parameters. Responses were used to calculate debt-to-asset and debt-to-income ratios. Predictors of moderate risk debt-to-asset ratio (0.5 to 0.9), high risk debt-to-asset ratio (≥0.9), and high risk debt-to-income ratio (>0.4) were evaluated. All analyses were performed in SPSS v.21. RESULTS: One hundred five trainees completed the survey (80% response rate), with 38% of respondents reporting greater than $200,000 in educational debt. Overall, 82% of respondents had a moderate or high risk debt-to-asset ratio. Residency program, year, sex, and perception of financial knowledge did not correlate with high risk debt-to-asset ratio. Residents with high debt-to-asset ratios were more likely to have a high level of concern about debt (52% vs 0%, p < 0.001) when compared with residents who had low debt-to-asset ratios. The majority (79%) of respondents felt strongly that inclusion of additional financial training in residency education is a critical need. CONCLUSIONS: In a climate of increasingly delayed financial gratification, surgical trainees are on critically unstable financial footing. There is a major gap in current surgical education that requires reassessment for the long-term financial health of residents.

Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal S-pouch.

PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy has revolutionized the surgical management of ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis syndromes. Though now evolved to include laparoscopy, this approach has not included alternative pouch designs such as ileal S-pouch reconstruction. This comparative analysis evaluated the combination of laparoscopic-assisted total proctocolectomy with an ileal S-pouch design. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six (65 laparoscopic-assisted) total proctocolectomy and ileal S-pouch-anal anastomosis procedures performed between 2003 to 2007 were identified from a prospective surgical database. Operative time, length of incision, length of hospital stay, complications, and return of bowel function were examined. A cost analysis including preoperative through postoperative hospital stay and operating room and postanesthesia care unit costs was performed. RESULTS: The laparoscopic-assisted total proctocolectomy and ileal S-pouch-anal anastomosis procedures were performed for ulcerative colitis in 60 cases and familial adenomatous polyposis in the remaining 5 patients. Four conversions to open technique occurred (6 percent). Comparing laparoscopic and open procedures, the laparoscopic approach took longer to perform than the open technique (mean 451 minutes vs. 347 minutes open; P < 0.001). The mean hospital stay was 6.3 days in the laparoscopic group vs. 8.2 days in the open group (P < 0.001). A detailed cost analysis revealed similar overall costs between the laparoscopic ($18,700) and open approaches ($18,500). CONCLUSION: Use of a laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal S-pouch-anal anastomosis reconstruction minimizes incision size and shortens hospital stay. At a teaching academic institution, the laparoscopic approach requires longer operative times yet a negligible cost disadvantage.