Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 28(6): 670-681, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30165910

RESUMO

AIMS: Planning mental health carer services requires information about the number of carers, their characteristics, service use and unmet support needs. Available Australian estimates vary widely due to different definitions of mental illness and the types of carers included. This study aimed to provide a detailed profile of Australian mental health carers using a nationally representative household survey. METHODS: The number of mental health carers, characteristics of carers and their care recipients, caring hours and tasks provided, service use and unmet service needs were derived from the national 2012 Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers. Co-resident carers of adults with a mental illness were compared with those caring for people with physical health and other cognitive/behavioural conditions (e.g., autism, intellectual disability, dementia) on measures of service use, service needs and aspects of their caring role. RESULTS: In 2012, there were 225 421 co-resident carers of adults with mental illness in Australia, representing 1.0% of the population, and an estimated further 103 813 mental health carers not living with their care recipient. The majority of co-resident carers supported one person with mental illness, usually their partner or adult child. Mental health carers were more likely than physical health carers to provide emotional support (68.1% v. 19.7% of carers) and less likely to assist with practical tasks (64.1% v. 86.6%) and activities of daily living (31.9% v. 48.9%). Of co-resident mental health carers, 22.5% or 50 828 people were confirmed primary carers - the person providing the most support to their care recipient. Many primary mental health carers (37.8%) provided more than 40 h of care per week. Only 23.8% of primary mental health carers received government income support for carers and only 34.4% received formal service assistance in their caring role, while 49.0% wanted more support. Significantly more primary mental health than primary physical health carers were dissatisfied with received services (20.0% v. 3.2%), and 35.0% did not know what services were available to them. CONCLUSIONS: Results reveal a sizable number of mental health carers with unmet needs in the Australian community, particularly with respect to financial assistance and respite care, and that these carers are poorly informed about available supports. The prominence of emotional support and their greater dissatisfaction with services indicate a need to better tailor carer services. If implemented carefully, recent Australian reforms including the Carer Gateway and National Disability Insurance Scheme hold promise for improving mental health carer supports.


Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Família/psicologia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Intermitentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Apoio Social , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Envelhecimento , Austrália/epidemiologia , Cuidadores/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Saúde Mental , Avaliação das Necessidades , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
4.
J Health Hum Serv Adm ; 20(4): 442-67, 1998.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10338721

RESUMO

The health of Australians, with the exception of Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders, compares favourably with other industrialised nations. Since 1984, universal access for citizens to medical and public hospital services has been achieved under a national Health Insurance Scheme called Medicare, partially funded by a 1.4 percent levy on all taxpayers. Medicare found early widespread support from the electorate but continues to be buffeted by a minority coalition of some medical associations, private health insurers, and conservative "libertarian" politicians. Over the decade since its inception, Medicare has provided stability in maintaining total health costs around 8 percent of GDP. This has been largely due to capping hospital costs via Commonwealth-State agreements. Medicare has failed in the past five years to contain medical costs which have increased proportionally with increases in the medical workforce. This article examines the structure and performance of Medicare and its role within Australia's overall health system. Benefits of a universal access insurance program are outlined together with challenges associated with inequities in health status, geography, aging of the population, burgeoning technology, ideological diversity, and an economic climate requiring cost containment and favouring privatisation and the role of the market. It can be concluded that, despite these challenges, universal access to health care is here to stay. Australia's Medicare program has become popular with the electorate.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Cobertura Universal do Seguro de Saúde , Austrália/epidemiologia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Geografia , Gastos em Saúde , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Inovação Organizacional , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Justiça Social , Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde/tendências
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA