Assessment of the methods used to detect HER2-positive advanced extramammary Paget's disease.

The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is recognized as an oncogene as well as a therapeutic target in various cancers. Certain patients with advanced extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) have also been reported to express HER2, which is therefore considered a therapeutic target for EMPD. However, an accurate methodology to determine HER2-positive EMPD has not been established. To assess the optimal methods for detection of HER2-positive EMPD, 73 EMPD samples were analyzed by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and the HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists, which combined the results of IHC staining and FISH. The results showed discordance in the rate of positive IHC staining and FISH results. While 68.6% (24/35) of the metastatic samples showed equivocal or positive IHC staining, only 37.1% (13/35) were positive by FISH. To assess the accuracy of these methods, the degree of HER2 expression detected by each method was correlated with the staining profiles of activated downstream signaling pathways involving phosphorylated p44/42 MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204) (p-ERK1/2) and phosphorylated AKT (Ser473) (p-AKT). Among 16 lymph node metastasis samples, all HER2-positive samples as determined by the testing algorithm stained positively for both p-ERK1/2 and p-AKT. On the other hand, 10-14.3% of the samples determined by FISH or IHC showed negative staining for p-ERK1/2 and p-AKT. The results showed that combining the results of IHC and FISH according to the HER2 testing algorithm is a useful method for accurately evaluating HER2-positive EMPD.

Fluctuations in routine blood count might signal severe immune-related adverse events in melanoma patients treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: Although nivolumab significantly prolongs survival of metastatic melanoma, about 10% of patients experience severe, even fatal immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Biomarkers to predict irAEs are, therefore, of great interest. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to correlate changes in routine blood count parameters to the occurrence of serious irAEs (grade 3/4 [G3/4] or lung/gastrointestinal [lung/GI] irAEs) in patients with melanoma who were treated with nivolumab. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 101 patient with melanoma treated with nivolumab from 8 institutes in Japan. We used logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between severe irAEs and fluctuations in routine blood count parameters (total white blood cell [WBC] count, relative neutrophil, monocyte, lymphocyte, and eosinophil count) during the treatment. Receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to determine a cutoff value for the blood count parameters and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that G3/4 irAEs were associated with increased total WBC count (P=0.034, cutoff value=+27%, AUC=0.68, odds ratio [OR]=1.58) and decreased relative lymphocyte count (RLC, P=0.042, cutoff value=-23%, AUC=0.65, OR=1.65). However, multivariate analysis showed that the same factors, increased WBC count (P=0.014, cutoff value=+59.1%, AUC=0.79, OR=6.04) and decreased RLC (P=0.012, cutoff value=-32.3%, AUC=0.81, OR=5.01) were independent factors associated with lung/GI irAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that increased WBC count and decreased RLC are associated with G3/4 and lung/GI irAEs. Our analysis was based on the data point at which irAE occurrence was noticed and, therefore, these factors are not predictive, however, they could be a "signal" of severe irAE occurrence in patients with melanoma treated with nivolumab.