Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Health Serv Res ; 56(4): 691-701, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33905119

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between recent changes in Medicaid eligibility and preconception insurance coverage, pregnancy intention, health care use, and risk factors for poor birth outcomes among first-time parents. DATA SOURCE: This study used individual-level data from the national Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2006-2017), which surveys individuals who recently gave birth in the United States on their experiences before, during, and after pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Outcomes included preconception insurance status, pregnancy intention, stress from bills, early prenatal care, and diagnoses of high blood pressure and diabetes. Outcomes were regressed on an index measuring Medicaid generosity, which captures the fraction of female-identifying individuals who would be eligible for Medicaid based on state income eligibility thresholds, in each state and year. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The sample included all individuals aged 20-44 with a first live birth in 2009-2017. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among all first-time parents, a 10-percentage point (ppt) increase in Medicaid generosity was associated with a 0.7 ppt increase (P = 0.017) in any insurance coverage and a 1.5 ppt increase (P < 0.001) in Medicaid coverage in the month before pregnancy. We also observed significant increases in insurance coverage and early prenatal care and declines in stress from bills and unintended pregnancies among individuals with a high-school degree or less. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing Medicaid generosity for childless adults has the potential to improve insurance coverage in the critical period before pregnancy and help improve maternal outcomes among first-time parents.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/legislação & jurisprudência , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez não Planejada , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Vasc Surg ; 73(5): 1759-1768.e1, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098941

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Active smoking among patients undergoing interventions for intermittent claudication (IC) is associated with poor outcomes. Notwithstanding, current levels of active smoking in these patients are high. State-level tobacco control policies have been shown to reduce smoking in the general US population. We evaluated whether state cigarette taxes and 100% smoke-free workplace legislation are associated with active smoking among patients undergoing interventions for IC. METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative database for peripheral endovascular interventions, infrainguinal bypasses, and suprainguinal bypasses for IC. Active smoking at the time of intervention was defined as smoking within one month of intervention. We implemented difference-in-differences analysis to isolate changes in active smoking owing to cigarette taxes (adjusted for inflation) and implementation of smoke-free workplace legislation. The difference-in-differences models estimated the causal effects of tobacco policies by adjusting for concurrent temporal trends in active smoking unrelated to cigarette taxes or smoke-free workplace legislation. The models controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, state, and year. We tested interactions of taxes with age and insurance. RESULTS: Data were available for 59,847 patients undergoing interventions for IC in 25 states from 2011 to 2019. Across the study period, active smoking at the time of intervention decreased from 48% to 40%. Every $1.00 cigarette tax increase was associated with a 6-percentage point decrease in active smoking (95% confidence interval, -10 to -1 percentage points; P = .02), representing an 11% decrease relative to the baseline proportion of patients actively smoking. The effect of cigarettes taxes was greater in older patients and those on Medicare. Among patients aged 60 to 69 and 70 to 79 years, every $1.00 tax increase resulted in 14% and 21% reductions in active smoking relative to baseline subgroup prevalences of 53% and 29%, respectively (P < .05 for both); however, younger age groups were not affected by tax increases. Among insurance groups, only patients on Medicare exhibited a significant change in active smoking with every $1.00 tax increase (an 18% decrease relative to a 33% baseline prevalence; P = .01). The number of states implementing smoke-free workplace legislation increased from 9 to 14 by 2019; however, this policy was not significantly associated with active smoking prevalence. At follow-up (median, 12.9 months), $1.00 tax increases were still associated with decreased smoking prevalence (a 25% decrease relative to a 33% baseline prevalence; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette tax increases seem to be an effective strategy to decrease active smoking among patients undergoing interventions for IC. Older patients and Medicare recipients are the most responsive to tax increases.


Assuntos
Claudicação Intermitente/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Produtos do Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Local de Trabalho , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/epidemiologia , Masculino , Medicare , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Doença Arterial Periférica/epidemiologia , Formulação de Políticas , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Política Antifumo/economia , Política Antifumo/legislação & jurisprudência , Fumar/economia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/economia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Impostos , Produtos do Tabaco/economia , Produtos do Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Local de Trabalho/legislação & jurisprudência
3.
Med Care ; 58(11): 963-967, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32925457

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Testing for BRCA1/2 mutations has increased among privately insured women in the United States. However, little is known about testing rates or trends among women with Medicaid. We sought to determine whether BRCA1/2 testing rates differed between women with private insurance compared with women with Medicaid in a state where both insurance types cover the test, and to compare testing trends from 2011 to 2015. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of medical claims from January 2011 through June 2015. We included Massachusetts women aged 18-64 with private insurance or Medicaid and at least 12 months of continuous enrollment. We used multivariable linear regression to examine the association of insurance type, age, and time with testing rates. RESULTS: Mean monthly BRCA1/2 testing rates were lower among women with Medicaid compared with those with private insurance. Among privately insured women, mean monthly rates rose from 9.3 per 100,000 in 2011 to 18.4 per 100,000 in 2015, while among Medicaid-insured women, rates increased from 3.7 to 14.7. There was no difference in the monthly rate of increase in both groups (P=0.07). In adjusted analyses, rates were lower among Medicaid-insured women (7 fewer tests per month than privately insured women, P<0.001), and differed by age, with women aged 44-54 most likely to receive testing and women 18-34 the least likely. CONCLUSION: BRCA1/2 testing rates were lower among women insured by Medicaid compared with those with private insurance, though rates increased from 2011 to 2015 among both groups of women at a similar rate.


Assuntos
Testes Genéticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Massachusetts , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Setor Privado , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Birth ; 41(3): 290-8, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24750358

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to examine the likelihood of primary cesarean delivery for women at low risk for the procedure in Massachusetts. METHODS: Birth certificate data for all births from 1996 to 2010 that were nulliparous, term, singleton, and vertex (NTSV; N = 427,393) were used to conduct logistic regression models to assess the likelihood of a cesarean delivery for each of the 31 ethnic groups relative to self-identified "American" mothers. The results were compared with broad classifications of race/ethnicity more commonly employed in research. RESULTS: While 23.3 percent of American women had primary cesarean deliveries, cesarean delivery rates varied from 12.9 percent for Cambodian to 32.4 percent for Nigerian women. Women from 21 of 30 ethnic groups had higher odds of a primary cesarean (range of adjusted odds ratios [AORs] 1.09-1.77), while only Chinese, Cambodian, and Japanese women had lower odds (range of AORs 0.66-0.92), compared with self-identified "Americans." Using broad race/ethnicity categories, Non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and "Other" women had higher odds of cesarean delivery relative to Non-Hispanic white women (range of AORs 1.12-1.47), while there were no differences for Asian or Pacific Islander women. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed maternal ethnicity explains the variation in NTSV cesarean delivery rates better than broad race/ethnicity categories. Different patterns of cesarean delivery between ethnic groups suggest cultural specificity related to birth culture.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Declaração de Nascimento , Diversidade Cultural , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Massachusetts , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
5.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 21(3): 242-7, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17439534

RESUMO

Maternal employment rates have increased rapidly in recent years and little is known about how this influences whether women start breast feeding. We examined data from the Millennium Cohort Study to determine whether a mother's employment status (full-time, part-time, self-employed, on leave, not employed/student) and employment characteristics are related to breast-feeding initiation. This analysis comprised 14 830 white mothers from Britain and Ireland (6917 employed) with singleton babies, born from 2000 to 2002. Information was obtained on infant feeding history and mother's employment when the cohort child was 9 months old. We found that women employed full-time were less likely to initiate breast feeding than mothers who were not employed/students, after adjustment for confounding factors [adjusted rate ratio (aRR) = 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89, 0.96]; however, there were no differences in breast-feeding initiation between mothers employed part-time, self-employed, or on leave and mothers who were not employed/students. Among employed mothers, those who returned to work within 4 months postpartum were less likely to start breast feeding than women who returned at 5 or 6 months [aRR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99], and women who returned within the first 6 weeks were much less likely to start breast feeding [aRR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.77, 0.94]. Mothers returning for financial reasons were also less likely to initiate breast feeding [aRR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.93, 0.99] than those who returned for other reasons. Policies to increase breast feeding should address how both the time and circumstances of a mother's return to employment postpartum influence whether she decides to start breast feeding.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Emprego , Mães/psicologia , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Escolaridade , Características da Família , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Longitudinais , Idade Materna , Licença Parental/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA