Predicting Risk of 1-Year Hospitalization Among Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

INTRODUCTION: US claims-based analyses emphasize the substantial hospitalization burden of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and the significant need for improved monitoring and more timely interventions. A claims-based predictive model may be useful to assist healthcare providers and payers in identifying patients with PAH at increased hospitalization risk. To address this aim, we constructed statistical models using baseline patient variables available in administrative healthcare claims to predict patients' risk for all-cause and PH-related hospitalization within 1 year of initiating ≥ 1 PAH indicated medication. METHODS: Adult patients with PAH who newly initiated ≥ 1 PAH indicated medication were selected from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (January 1, 2009-January 31, 2019). Cox regression models were built with a randomly selected training set and evaluated using a validation set of remaining patients. Predictive variables for the models were selected in three steps: clinical knowledge, univariate analysis, and backward stepwise selection. RESULTS: Within 1 year of initiating ≥ 1 PAH indicated medication, 1502/3872 (38.8%) had an all-cause hospitalization and 950/3872 (24.5%) had a pulmonary hypertension (PH)-related hospitalization. Predictive risk factors for all-cause hospitalization were Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score 2-3 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.229; P = 0.038] and ≥ 4 (HR 1.531; P < 0.001), claims-based frailty index (CFI) score > 1 (highest frailty level; HR 1.301; P = 0.018), hemoptysis (HR 1.254; P = 0.016), malaise/fatigue (HR 1.150; P = 0.037), history of PH-related hospitalization (HR 1.171; P = 0.011), non-PH-related ER visit (HR 1.713; P = 0.014), and higher non-PH-related outpatient visit cost (HR 1.069; P < 0.001). Predictive risk factors for PH-related hospitalization were female sex (HR 1.264; P = 0.004), Quan-CCI score ≥ 4 (HR 1.408; P = 0.008), portal hypertension (HR 1.565; P = 0.019), CFI score > 1 (HR 1.522; P = 0.002), dyspnea (HR 1.259; P = 0.023), and history of PH-related hospitalization (HR 1.273; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The US claims-based predictive models showed acceptable performance to predict 1-year hospitalization among patients with PAH.

Healthcare Costs of Multiple Myeloma Patients with Four or More Prior Lines of Therapy, Including Triple-Class Exposure in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) remains a challenge as patients eventually progress through several lines of therapy (LOTs), requiring use of multiple MM drug classes. In this retrospective US claims-database study, we examined the healthcare costs of patients with MM who received ≥ 4 prior LOTs, including triple-class exposure (TCE). METHODS: Adult patients with MM were selected from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare claims databases (1 January 2012-30 June 2021). Eligible patients were required to have received at least four prior LOTs, and TCE (i.e., received a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody) after the first-observed diagnosis of MM. The index date was defined as the initiation date of the first subsequent LOT after meeting the eligibility criteria for the study, and this date had to be after 1 January 2017 to capture contemporary cost estimates. The primary outcome measurements were all-cause and MM-related healthcare costs after the index date. RESULTS: The study population included 68 patients with MM (63% men), with a mean age of 59.8 years. Mean duration from first-observed MM diagnosis until index date averaged 46.7 months. During a mean follow-up of 21.9 months, total all-cause healthcare costs averaged US$757,386 per patient (equivalent to US$34,610 per patient per month). MM-related healthcare costs (US$670,561 per patient) contributed on average 88.5% to the total all-cause healthcare costs; the majority (67.2%) of MM-related healthcare costs were attributed to drug and infusion costs (US$450,952 per patient). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective US claims-database study, patients with MM with ≥ 4 prior LOTs, including TCE, continued to experience high healthcare costs that were mostly attributable to anti-myeloma drugs and their administration.

Healthcare Costs Incurred by Patients with Multiple Myeloma Following Triple Class Exposure (TCE) in the US.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of plasma cells; most MM patients will eventually relapse or become refractory to treatment. Treating MM patients remains a challenge since patients eventually progress through several lines of therapy (LOTs), requiring the use of multiple MM drug classes. We examined healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and the costs incurred by MM patients following triple class exposure (TCE; defined as exposure to a proteosome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, and an anti-CD-38 antibody). METHODS: Adult MM patients were selected from the MarketScan® commercial and Medicare supplemental databases (January 2009-February 2021). From this cohort, patients who had TCE and ≥ 1 subsequent LOT that occurred after January 1, 2017 were included in the study population. The initiation date for the first post-TCE LOT was defined as the index date. All-cause and MM-related HCRU and the associated costs were examined post-index date. RESULTS: A total of 85 MM patients with TCE who initiated ≥ 1 subsequent LOT post-TCE and had ≥ 1 year of follow-up post-index date were included in the study population; mean age on index date was 58.8 years, and 60.0% were male. The time from first-observed MM diagnosis until index date averaged 47.5 months. During an average follow-up of 20.9 months post-index date, 64.7% of patients (N = 55) initiated a second LOT and 35.2% (N = 30) received at least 3 LOTs. During follow-up, mean total all-cause healthcare cost per patient was $722,992 (equivalent to $34,578 per patient per month [PPPM]). Approximately 90.7% ($655,524 per patient) of the total all-cause healthcare costs were MM related, 66.0% of which were MM drug/infusion costs. CONCLUSION: In this real-world US study, MM patients with TCE incurred high healthcare costs, with the majority being MM related and primarily attributed to MM drug and infusion costs.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin Among Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Obesity and Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is associated with a substantial economic burden, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions. This study compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs of rivaroxaban and warfarin in patients with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes. METHODS: A de-identified healthcare claims database was used to identify adult patients newly initiating rivaroxaban or warfarin and having at least one medical claim with a diagnosis of AF, obesity determined by validated algorithm, and at least one claim with a diagnosis of diabetes or for antidiabetic medication from December 2011 to March 2020. Propensity score matching was used to balance the treatment cohorts on the basis of demographics and baseline characteristics. All-cause and NVAF-related HRU rates and costs were compared between treatments using rate ratios, and mean cost differences were calculated on a per patient per year (PPPY) basis. RESULTS: A total of 9999 matched pairs of patients with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes were identified in the rivaroxaban and warfarin cohorts. Rate ratios of all-cause HRU were significantly reduced with rivaroxaban versus warfarin in all healthcare settings evaluated, except emergency room visits. The greatest impact was on physician office visits followed by hospital outpatient and inpatient visits. NVAF-related HRU was significantly lower for rivaroxaban versus warfarin in all care settings. Consistent with these findings, the length of hospital stay was significantly reduced by approximately 4 days among all patients for both all-cause and NVAF-related hospitalizations in the rivaroxaban cohort compared with the warfarin cohort. Rivaroxaban was associated with reductions in all-cause total healthcare costs by more than $5000 PPPY and NVAF-related medical costs by approximately $1100 PPPY. CONCLUSION: In comparison with warfarin, rivaroxaban reduced HRU and costs, particularly hospital inpatient and outpatient visits and physician office visits, in patients with NVAF and comorbidities of obesity and diabetes.

People who are overweight or obese are at risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) along with other medical conditions, such as diabetes. Standard therapy with oral anticoagulants or blood thinners is recommended to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF). In this study, we evaluated healthcare insurance claims for people with NVAF, obesity, and diabetes who started therapy with warfarin or rivaroxaban from 2011 to 2020 to compare the use and cost of healthcare services, such as hospitalizations and doctor visits, using diagnosis and procedure codes. The study included nearly 20,000 patients with similar characteristics. Patients who started treatment with rivaroxaban used fewer healthcare services for any cause and for those related to NVAF than those who started treatment with warfarin. The difference in use of services was largest for hospital outpatient and inpatient visits and doctor office visits; emergency room visits were only different for those related to NVAF. Length of hospital stay was also shorter for patients receiving rivaroxaban versus those receiving warfarin. These differences in healthcare service use translated into lower costs associated with rivaroxaban versus warfarin. The findings of this study suggest that treatment with rivaroxaban reduces the use of healthcare services compared with warfarin. This difference may be related, in part, to the reduced risks of stroke and systemic embolism observed in other real-world studies with rivaroxaban compared to warfarin. In addition, rivaroxaban does not require routine blood testing, which is required with warfarin treatment.

Chemotherapy treatments, costs of care, and survival for elderly patients diagnosed with cervical cancer: an observational study.

Objective: To describe chemotherapy treatments, associated health care use and costs, and survival for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in the United States.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years, identified in linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and Medicare databases. Women with a new primary diagnosis of cervical cancer between January 2007 and December 2013 were followed until December 2014. Systemic chemotherapy treatments, health care visits and costs (2016 USD rates), and survival were determined by the line of therapy.Results: Of 1651 women in the analysis, 810 (49.1%) were diagnosed at stages I or II, 411 (24.9%) at stage III, and 430 (26.0%) at stage IV. A total of 225 (13.6%) women received first-line (1L) systemic chemotherapy. Of those who received 1L chemotherapy, 73 (32.4%) received second-line (2L) chemotherapy, and 29 (12.9%) received third-line (3L) chemotherapy. During 1L and 2L chemotherapies, patients averaged 5.9 and 6.5 health care visits per month, respectively, and incurred total mean health care costs per patient per month of $7098 and $8770, respectively. Median survival from the start of 1L and 2L chemotherapy was 14.0 and 10.4 months, respectively.Conclusion: Elderly patients with advanced cervical cancer had a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 14 months or less, and had no standard of care for 2L therapy. Systemic chemotherapies pose a substantial economic burden in the range of $7000 to $9000 per patient per month. These results highlight the high unmet medical need among elderly patients with cervical cancer.

Survival, Chemotherapy Treatments, and Health Care Utilization Among Patients with Advanced Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Most cases of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are diagnosed at an advanced stage. The objective of this study was to investigate patient characteristics, survival, chemotherapy treatments, and health care use after a diagnosis of advanced SCLC in subjects enrolled in a health system network. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥ 18 years who either were diagnosed with stage III/IV SCLC or who progressed to advanced SCLC during the study period (2005-2015). Patients identified from the Indiana State Cancer Registry and the Indiana Network for Patient Care were followed from their advanced diagnosis index date until the earliest date of the last visit, death, or the end of the study period. Patient characteristics, survival, chemotherapy regimens, associated health care visits, and durations of treatment were reported. Time-to-event analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 498 patients with advanced SCLC were identified, of whom 429 were newly diagnosed with advanced disease and 69 progressed to advanced disease during the study period. Median survival from the index diagnosis date was 13.2 months. First-line (1L) chemotherapy was received by 464 (93.2%) patients, most commonly carboplatin/etoposide, received by 213 (45.9%) patients, followed by cisplatin/etoposide (20.7%). Ninety-five (20.5%) patients progressed to second-line (2L) chemotherapy, where topotecan monotherapy (20.0%) was the most common regimen, followed by carboplatin/etoposide (14.7%). Median survival was 10.1 months from 1L initiation and 7.7 months from 2L initiation. CONCLUSION: Patients in a regional health system network diagnosed with advanced SCLC were treated with chemotherapy regimens similar to those in earlier reports based on SEER-Medicare data. Survival of patients with advanced SCLC was poor, illustrating the lack of progress over several decades in the treatment of this lethal disease and highlighting the need for improved treatments.

Chemotherapy treatments, costs of care, and survival for patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer: A SEER-Medicare study.

OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness and costs of new treatments should be assessed in relation to existing practice. We describe treatments, survival and costs for advanced or metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients receiving systemic therapy in the period preceding the introduction of immunotherapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years, identified using linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases. Individuals with a new primary diagnosis of SCLC between January 2007 and December 2013 were followed until December 2014. Chemotherapy treatments, health care visits and costs (in 2016 USD), and survival were determined by line of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 11 812 patients were identified with SCLC. First-line (1L) chemotherapy was received by 6509 (55.1%) patients, most (93.2%) with carboplatin- (71.0%) or cisplatin- (22.2%) based therapies, typically combined with etoposide (79.2%). Second- (2L) and third- (3L) line chemotherapies were received by 2238 (18.9%) and 679 (5.7%) patients, of which 48.4% and 30.9%, respectively, were platinum-based. The median durations of 1L, 2L, and 3L carboplatin-based therapies were 5.9, 4.8, and 5.4 months, respectively, and the corresponding durations of cisplatin-based therapies were 5.3, 4.2, and 5.3 months. During 1L, 2L, and 3L chemotherapies, patients averaged 8.2, 7.4, and 7.3 health care visits per month, respectively, and incurred total mean health care costs of $60 223, $42 636, and $35 903 per patient, respectively. Median survival from the start of 1L, 2L, and 3L chemotherapy was 9.2, 6.0, and 5.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: First-line chemotherapy was primarily platinum-based, and a plethora of different regimens was used for 2L and 3L chemotherapies. Median survival from the start of 1L chemotherapy was 9 months, with an associated health care cost of $60 000. These data highlight an unmet medical need among SCLC patients receiving systemic therapy.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Overall Survival, and Occurrence and Costs of Adverse Events Associated With First-line Therapies for Medicare Patients 65 Years and Older With Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: This study sought to better understand real-world treatment patterns, overall and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-specific survival, adverse event (AE) occurrence, and economic impact of first-line cancer therapies in Medicare patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients ≥ 65 years in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database who received a first-time advanced (stage IV) NSCLC diagnosis from 2007 to 2011, and who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from 2007 through mid-2013. First-line regimens, healthcare resource use, occurrence of AEs, and associated costs (2013 US dollars) were analyzed. Median survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Surprisingly, only 46% of patients (n = 13,472) with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC received systemic therapy, and 5931 received platinum-based therapy. The mean age was 73 years, with 3354 (57%) males; 1489 (25%) had squamous and 4442 (75%) nonsquamous histology. The most common regimens were carboplatin doublets (70%), including carboplatin/paclitaxel (38%), carboplatin/pemetrexed (12%), carboplatin/gemcitabine (11%), and carboplatin/docetaxel (7%). The median overall survival from first-line therapy initiation was 7.2 months (95% confidence interval, 7.0-7.5 months). Dyspnea and anemia were the most common AEs of interest, whereas atypical pneumonia was associated with the greatest AE-related costs (mean, $5044). The mean total per-patient-per-month cost was $11,909, with AE-related costs comprising 9% of total costs. The highest costs and survival were observed for patients treated with carboplatin/pemetrexed and bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data illustrate the most common first-line regimens by histology, overall survival, AEs, and some of the high AE-related costs of therapy for advanced NSCLC, and provides extremely useful information for clinicians.

Survival Rates and Health Care Costs for Patients With Advanced Bladder Cancer Treated and Untreated With Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Systemic chemotherapy has long been the standard of care for advanced bladder cancer, but its cost implications are poorly understood. The objective of this analysis was to estimate survival and health care costs for patients with stage IV bladder cancer who did or did not receive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database with a new primary diagnosis of stage IV bladder cancer between January 2007 and December 2011. Survival and health care visits and costs following the date of diagnosis were determined for treated and untreated patients. Costs were expressed in 2016 US dollars. RESULTS: A total of 1215 patients were diagnosed with stage IV bladder cancer, of whom 411 (33.8%) were treated with chemotherapy and 804 (66.2%) were untreated. Median overall survival was 10 months longer for treated than for untreated patients: 13.2 (95% confidence interval, 12.3-14.1) months versus 3.2 (95% confidence interval, 3.0-3.5) months. Treated patients had fewer per-patient-per-month (PPPM) health care visits than untreated patients (7.5 vs. 10.2, P < .01) and lower total PPPM health care costs ($10,707 vs. $18,935). Overall mean total lifetime costs were greater for treated than for untreated patients ($139,893 vs. $66,829, P < .05), which was driven by an approximate 4-fold increase in life expectancy for the treated patients. CONCLUSION: Approximately two thirds of patients diagnosed with stage IV bladder cancer were not treated with systemic chemotherapy. Increasing the percentage of treated patients in this population could potentially extend overall survival while simultaneously lowering PPPM costs.

Projecting the effect of nesiritide on dialysis and hospital mortality in cardiac surgery patients.

OBJECTIVE: To predict the effect of nesiritide on clinical outcomes based on the renal function change demonstrated in the Nesiritide Administered Peri-Anesthesia (NAPA) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery trial. METHODS: We built a decision analytical model to replicate the NAPA trial with 1000 hypothetical patients in both nesiritide and placebo arms. The incident rates of dialysis, hospital death, and their composite were predicted based on the renal function data obtained from the NAPA trial. All analyses were further repeated for two subgroups stratified by the presence of preoperative renal dysfunction (RD). RESULTS: The base-case analyses significantly favored nesiritide for the three clinical end points. In the total NAPA sample, the absolute risk reductions (ARRs) for dialysis, hospital death, and their composite across 100 simulated trials were 1.3%, 3.3%, and 4.1%, respectively. The improvement was more pronounced in the preoperative RD subgroup with the three ARRs of 4.1%, 7.1%, and 9.4%, respectively. The beneficial effect diminished in the normal preoperative renal function (NRF) subgroup with the three ARRs of 0.6%, 3.0%, and 3.4%, respectively. The best case analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case results in the total NAPA sample and RD subgroup, but not in the NRF subgroup. CONCLUSION: If the demonstrated renal preservation can be extrapolated, nesiritide may reduce dialysis and hospital death in cardiac surgery patient with preoperative RD, but to a much lesser extent or not in patients with normal preoperative renal function.