Toward electronic health recording: evaluation of electronic patient reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) system for remote monitoring of early systemic lupus patients.

The study aimed to assess the value of evaluation of electronic patient reported outcome measures (e-PROMs) in the assessment and management of SLE disease activity flares, its association with adherence to therapy as well as organ damage. A randomized, controlled crossover study was carried out over a 24-month duration. One hundred forty-seven SLE patients meeting the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria were enrolled. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) was used to assess disease activity, whereas organ damage was scored using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)/ACR Damage Index. In the first 12 months, the patients were assessed every 3 months. At 12 months, the patients were randomized into a cohort of 73 patients who continued their care in the same style and 74 patients who completed an online e-PROMs questionnaire on monthly basis for another 12-month period. The data captured were then retrospectively analyzed at the end of the 24-month study period. At the end of the first year of the study, the mean SLEDAI and SDI scores were 8.72 (6.1) and 1.9 (2.2). At the end of the second year, the mean SLEDAI and SDI scores in the e-PROMs cohort were 3.1 (2.6) and 1.2 (1.3), whereas in the control group, the scores were 7.63 (6.7) and 1.8 (2.3), respectively (p < 0.01). Adjusting for possible confounding variables, the number of flares, regardless of their severity, was associated with damage accrual (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.83, p < 0.001). Adherence to therapy was significantly (p < 0.1) higher in the e-PROMs group. e-PROMs was equivalent to PROMs paper format and has a potential disease-modifying effect as it facilitated close monitoring of disease activity with an option of management escalation whenever indicated.

Can a change in policy reduce emergency hospital admissions? Effect of admission avoidance team, guideline implementation and maximising the observation unit.

BACKGROUND: Reduction in admissions is an important aim of emergency department working policy to overcome the problems of a shortage of inpatient beds, overcrowding, rising costs and exhausted resources. A new policy was instituted in the emergency department of a hospital in Kuwait with the following components: (1) an admission avoidance team of emergency department doctors; (2) implementation of disease management guidelines; and (3) maximising the use of an emergency department observation unit. METHODS: The effects of this policy on reduction in admission rates for total medical admissions and for chest pain, bronchial asthma, heart failure, pneumonia and pyelonephritis as selected samples of common medical conditions were prospectively studied over a period of 3 years from institution of the policy and compared with the 3-year period before the policy was instituted. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in admission rates after institution of the new policy, with a relative reduction of 35.9% for total medical admissions, 52.7% for chest pain, 49.2% for bronchial asthma, 34.7% for heart failure, 59.1% for pneumonia and 43.3% for pyelonephritis compared with the period before the policy was instituted. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary emergency department policy, using as much available evidence as possible, was successful in significantly reducing medical hospital admissions in spite of the rising numbers of patients visiting the emergency department and observation unit.

Aspects of assessment and management of velopharyngeal dysfunction in developing countries.

Proper assessment of patients with velopharyngeal valve incompetence is a mandatory prerequisite for optimal management. The protocol of assessment of Ain Shams University, Phoniatric Department, uses three levels of assessment of velopharyngeal valve incompetence according to the complexity of the armamentarium used. This allows application of those parts of the protocol that suit the needs of the different socioeconomic levels and geographical locations. Firstly, the elementary diagnostic procedures, which are rather simple, noninvasive, but essentially subjective. Despite the clinical feasibility of these procedures, documentation of the data is made utilizing the tools at the second level of assessment in that protocol (clinical diagnostic aids). This level comprises video-nasofiberscopy and high fidelity voice recording. An attempt to extract quasi-quantitative measures from the hitherto qualitative video-nasofiberscopy is made. The third level of assessment, namely additional instrumental measures, comprises CT scanning of the velopharyngeal port, aerodynamics, and acoustic analysis. The results of the three levels of the protocol are presented. Their significance and clinical efficacy are discussed. Some community-related problems that have faced the cleft palate team are outlined. Their sociocultural significance in a developing country is discussed.