Long-term outcomes of etiology specific annuloplasty ring repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Reductive annuloplasty repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with high rates of recurrent MR, which may be improved with etiology-specific annuloplasty rings. METHODS: From October 2005 to May 2015, 128 consecutive patients underwent repair of IMR with the GeoForm ring. Clinical data was extracted from our local Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and electronic medical records. Mortality data was obtained from the Michigan State Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 65±11 years with mean pre-op left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30%±10% and MR grade of 3.1±0.9 (0-4+). Thirty-day mortality was 4.7%, rate of renal failure 7.9%, rate of atrial fibrillation 27.3%, and no strokes were observed. Of the surviving patients, 89% (109/122) had a follow-up echocardiogram beyond 1 month with a mean echocardiographic follow-up of 59±39 months. LVEF improved from 30%±10% to 38%±14%, P<0.001) while end-diastolic (5.9±0.0 to 5.3±0.9 cm, P<0.001) and end-systolic (5.0±1.0 to 4.4±1.1 cm, P<0.001) left ventricular (LV) diameters decreased, as compared to pre-operative values. Seven patients were found to have recurrent moderate or greater IMR in follow-up to 10 years with three being due to ring dehiscence. One-, 5-, and 10-year freedom from recurrent moderate or severe IMR was 98%, 94%, and 80% respectively. One-, 5-, and 10-year survival was 91%, 77%, and 44%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, etiology-specific ring repair of IMR was associated with low rates of recurrent MR on long-term follow-up, coupled with significant LV reverse remodeling and improvement in ejection fraction.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe mitral or tricuspid regurgitation at extreme risk for surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and severe mitral regurgitation or severe tricuspid regurgitation were excluded from the major transcatheter aortic valve replacement trials. We studied these 2 subgroups in patients at extreme risk for surgery in the prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm CoreValve US Expanded Use Study. METHODS: The primary end point was all-cause mortality or major stroke at 1 year. A favorable medical benefit was defined as a Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score greater than 45 at 6 months and greater than 60 at 1 year and with a less than 10-point decrease from baseline. RESULTS: There were 53 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics for the severe mitral regurgitation and severe tricuspid regurgitation cohorts were age 84.2 ± 6.4 years and 84.9 ± 6.5 years; male, 29 (54.7%) and 22 (41.5%), and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 9.9% ± 5.0% and 9.2% ± 4.0%, respectively. Improvement in valve regurgitation from baseline to 1 year occurred in 72.7% of the patients with severe mitral regurgitation and in 61.8% of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation. A favorable medical benefit occurred in 31 of 47 patients (66.0%) with severe mitral regurgitation and 33 of 47 patients (70.2%) with severe tricuspid regurgitation at 6 months, and in 25 of 44 patients (56.8%) with severe mitral regurgitation and 24 of 45 patients (53.3%) with severe tricuspid regurgitation at 1 year. All-cause mortality or major stroke for the severe mitral regurgitation and severe tricuspid regurgitation cohorts were 11.3% and 3.8% at 30 days and 21.0% and 19.2% at 1 year, respectively. There were no major strokes in either group at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with severe mitral regurgitation or severe tricuspid regurgitation is reasonable and safe and leads to improvement in atrioventricular valve regurgitation.

A propensity matched analysis of outcomes and long term survival in stented versus stentless valves.

BACKGROUND: To compare the perioperative and long term survival after aortic valve replacement using stentless versus stented valves in a large cohort of patients grouped using propensity score matching. METHODS: From 1991 to 2012, 4,563 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented valves at our institution. Propensity score matching identified 444 pairs using 13 independent variables: incidence of operation, smoking status, renal failure, hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic lung disease, ejection fraction, gender, age, valve status, and use of coronary artery bypass graft. Data were collected from our Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and the Social Security Death Index. Groups were compared using univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The two groups demonstrated no significant differences for the 13 matching variables and the majority of 30-day outcomes (p > 0.05). The stented valve group showed a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding (3.6% vs 1.1%, p = 0.015), but a lower incidence of stroke (0.9% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.028). One, five, and 10-year survival was 95.0, 80.7, and 52.8% for stented and 93.2, 80.5, and 51.3% for stentless valves. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.641). CONCLUSIONS: Stentless and stented valves had identical 30-day outcomes except for a higher postoperative incidence of bleeding and a lower incidence of stroke in the stented group. There was no significant difference in long term survival between valve types. Both valves may be used for aortic valve replacement with low morbidity and excellent long term survival.

Outcomes in patients undergoing complex cardiac repairs with cross clamp times over 300 minutes.

BACKGROUND: Long cross clamp times have been associated with poor clinical outcomes, yet some patients require extremely long ischemic times to repair complex surgical problems. The purpose of this study was to examine short and mid-term survival and to identify risk factors for mortality and morbidity in patients with cross clamp times greater than or equal to 300 min. METHODS: Review of our institution's Society of Thoracic Surgeons database identified 202 patients who underwent surgical procedures necessitating aortic cross clamp times 300 min or greater between 2001 and 2012. Short-term (30-day) clinical outcomes were derived from this database and survival was assessed utilizing the Social Security Death Index. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the relationship between independent variables and mortality and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 69.5 ± 10.6 (mean ± standard deviation) years and the mean ejection fraction was 52 ± 12 %. 70.3 % of patients were male. Mean cross clamp time was 346 ± 45 min, and total bypass time was 421 ± 70 min. Thirty-day mortality was 12.4 %. The incidence of bleeding and stroke were 6.4 % and 4.0 % respectively. Prolonged ventilation occurred in 26.7 % of patients, and incidence of renal failure was 10.4 %. One, three, five, and seven year survival of the patients who survived the first 30 days post-surgery was 91.9 %, 83.2 %, 75.6 % and 65.7 % respectively. Proportional hazards analysis determined that the statistically significant hazard ratios for mid-term mortality for female gender, age, and prolonged postoperative ventilation were 2.11, 1.04 and 2.72, respectively (p < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac procedures requiring extremely long ischemic times have significant early mortality and morbidity. However, mid-term survival in the patients who survive is good. Decision-making regarding operability in complex cases should allow for long ischemic times.

Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with prior cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been advocated for very elderly patients with aortic stenosis, and prior cardiac surgery as a less invasive treatment option. Although surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) is safe and effective in selected elderly patients, the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of AVR in very elderly with prior cardiac surgery are unknown. METHODS: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Database at our center enrolled 3,735 patients after AVR since 1997. In this time interval, we identified 61 patients 80 years and older who underwent AVR for severe AS or failed aortic bioprosthesis after having prior cardiac surgery. All clinical parameters were derived from the STS database. Follow-up mortality was assessed using the Social Security Death Index. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 83 ± 2 years, 77% were male, and 75% underwent an isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) as their first cardiac procedure. The mean ejection fraction was 0.53 ± 0.13. The CABG was performed concurrently in 49% of patients at the time of redo sternotomy and AVR. Stented bioprosthesis was implanted in 61% of patients and stentless in 39%. Perioperative mortality was 1.6% (1 of 61). One, 3, 5, and 7 year survival rates were 85%, 69%, 63%, and 43%, respectively. Patients with AVR only had similar survival to patients who underwent concomitant AVR and CABG. Type of aortic prosthesis did not influence postoperative survival. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients over the age of 80 with history of prior cardiac surgery, AVR can be performed safely with very good mid-term outcomes. Age alone should not be exclusion criteria for surgical AVR in octogenarians with prior cardiac surgery.

Five-year real world outcomes of GeoForm ring implantation in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Reductive ring annuloplasty represents the current standard surgical therapy for ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR); however, the clinical results have been suboptimal. Etiology-specific prostheses such as the GeoForm annuloplasty ring have been designed to better address the annular and subvalvular perturbations associated with IMR. However, clinical experience is limited, and mid-term results are lacking. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical outcomes of 86 patients who had undergone implantation of a GeoForm ring at our center from 2005 to 2011. Perioperative mortality and clinical parameters were derived from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Follow-up survival was assessed using the Social Security Death Index. Surviving patients were interviewed by telephone for valve-specific follow-up data and to complete the Medical Outcomes Study, short-form, 36-item, quality-of-life questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean grade of IMR preoperatively was 3.1±0.8 (range, 1-4+), 0.2±0.4 in the immediate postoperative period, and 0.7±0.7 at the last mean follow-up point of 41 months; only 2 patients developed ≥2+IMR during the follow-up period, for a 5-year freedom from recurrent 2+ IMR of 86%. The mean left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters decreased from before to after surgery from 6.0±0.0 cm to 5.3±09 cm and 5.0±0.9 cm to 4.3±1.1 cm, respectively (P<.001). Perioperative mortality was 5.8% (5 of 86), and 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival was 87%, 81%, and 75%, respectively. At the last follow-up point, 80% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I and II, and their quality of life was equal to, or better than, age-matched controls from the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the GeoForm ring offers very good control of IMR, with low rate of recurrent IMR at mid-term follow-up. The use of this prosthesis was associated with good perioperative mortality, mid-term survival, and quality of life.

Impact of dexmedetomidine on analgesic requirements in patients after cardiac surgery in a fast-track recovery room setting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative opioid requirements in patients who received dexmedetomidine versus propofol after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Large, community teaching hospital that uses a fast-track cardiovascular recovery unit (CVRU) model. PATIENTS: One hundred adults who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery and/or valvular surgery, and who received either dexmedetomidine (50 patients) or propofol (50 patients) for perioperative sedation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were matched according to surgery type and left ventricular ejection fraction. Opioid requirements were assessed over two time intervals: from arrival in the CVRU to discontinuation of the sedative infusion, and from CVRU arrival to CVRU discharge, up to a maximum of 72 hours if admission to the intensive care unit was necessary. All postoperative opioid doses were converted to morphine equivalents. Length of mechanical ventilation, quality of sedation, adverse drug events, and sedation-related costs were determined. Opioid requirements were significantly lower during the sedative infusion period for dexmedetomidine-treated patients than for propofol-treated patients (median [range] 0 [0-10 mg] vs 4 mg [0-33 mg], p<0.001), but not through the entire CVRU admission (median [range] 26 mg [0-119 mg] vs 30 mg (0-100 mg], p=0.284). The proportion of patients who did not require opioids during the infusion was significantly higher in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the propofol group (32 [64%] vs 13 [26%], p<0.001). No significant differences were noted between the groups for length of mechanical ventilation, quality of sedation, or adverse events. Sedation-related costs were significantly higher (approximately $50/patient higher) with dexmedetomidine (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine resulted in lower opioid requirements in patients after cardiac surgery versus those receiving propofol, but this did not result in shorter durations of mechanical ventilation, using a fast-track CVRU model.

Cardiac surgeons and the quality movement: the Michigan experience.

The Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons created a voluntary quality collaborative with all the cardiac surgeons in the state and all hospitals doing adult cardiac surgery. Utilizing this collaborative over the last 3 years and creating a unique relationship with a payor, an approach to processes and outcomes has produced improvements in the quality of care for cardiac patients in the state of Michigan.