Association between trajectories of adherence to endocrine therapy and risk of treated breast cancer recurrence among US nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapy is the mainstay treatment for breast cancer (BC) to reduce BC recurrence risk. During the first year of endocrine therapy use, nearly 30% of BC survivors are nonadherent, which may increase BC recurrence risk. This study is to examine the association between endocrine therapy adherence trajectories and BC recurrence risk in nonmetastatic BC survivors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included Medicare beneficiaries in the United States (US) with incident nonmetastatic BC followed by endocrine therapy initiation in 2010-2019 US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results linked Medicare data. We calculated monthly fill-based proportion of days covered in the first year of endocrine therapy. We applied group-based trajectory models to identify distinct endocrine therapy adherence patterns. After the end of the first-year endocrine therapy trajectory measurement period, we estimated the risk of time to first treated BC recurrence within 4 years using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: We identified 5 trajectories of adherence to endocrine therapy in BC Stages 0-I subgroup (n = 28,042) and in Stages II-III subgroup (n = 7781). A trajectory of discontinuation before 6 months accounted for 7.0% in Stages 0-I and 5.8% in Stages II-III subgroups, and this trajectory was associated with an increased treated BC recurrence risk compared to nearly perfect adherence (Stages 0-I: adjusted hazard [aHR] = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.46-2.33; Stages II-III: aHR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.07-1.77). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 7% of BC survivors who discontinued before completing 6 months of treatment was associated with an increased treated BC recurrence risk compared to those with nearly perfect adherence among Medicare nonmetastatic BC survivors.

Association between trajectories of prescription opioid use and risk of opioid use disorder and overdose among US nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: To examine the association between prescription opioid use trajectories and risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) or overdose among nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors by treatment type. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included female nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors with at least 1 opioid prescription fill in 2010-2019 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results linked Medicare data. Opioid mean daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME) calculated within 1.5 years after initiating active breast cancer therapy. Group-based trajectory models identified distinct opioid use trajectory patterns. Risk of time to first OUD/overdose event within 1 year after the trajectory period was calculated for distinct trajectory groups using Cox proportional hazards models. Analyses were stratified by treatment type. RESULTS: Four opioid use trajectories were identified for each treatment group. For 38,030 survivors with systemic endocrine therapy, 3 trajectories were associated with increased OUD/overdose risk compared with early discontinuation: minimal dose (< 5 MME; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.73 [95% CI 1.43-2.09]), very low dose (5-25 MME; 2.67 [2.05-3.48]), and moderate dose (51-90 MME; 6.20 [4.69-8.19]). For 9477 survivors with adjuvant chemotherapy, low-dose opioid use was associated with higher OUD/overdose risk (aHR = 7.33 [95% CI 2.52-21.31]) compared with early discontinuation. For 3513 survivors with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the differences in OUD/OD risks across the 4 trajectories were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors receiving systemic endocrine therapy or adjuvant chemotherapy, compared with early discontinuation, low-dose or moderate-dose opioid use were associated with six- to sevenfold higher OUD/overdose risk. Breast cancer survivors at high-risk of OUD/overdose may benefit from targeted interventions (e.g., pain clinic referral).

Sex differences in brain transcriptomes of juvenile Cynomolgus macaques.

Background: Behavioral, social, and physical characteristics are posited to distinguish the sexes, yet research on transcription-level sexual differences in the brain is limited. Here, we investigated sexually divergent brain transcriptomics in prepubertal cynomolgus macaques, a commonly used surrogate species to humans. Methods: A transcriptomic profile using RNA sequencing was generated for the temporal lobe, ventral midbrain, and cerebellum of 3 female and 3 male cynomolgus macaques previously treated with an Adeno-associated virus vector mix. Statistical analyses to determine differentially expressed protein-coding genes in all three lobes were conducted using DeSeq2 with a false discovery rate corrected P value of .05. Results: We identified target genes in the temporal lobe, ventral midbrain, and cerebellum with functions in translation, immunity, behavior, and neurological disorders that exhibited statistically significant sexually divergent expression. Conclusions: We provide potential mechanistic insights to the epidemiological differences observed between the sexes with regards to mental health and infectious diseases, such as COVID19. Our results provide pre-pubertal information on sexual differences in non-human primate brain transcriptomics and may provide insight to health disparities between the biological sexes in humans.

Economic Burden of Sanfilippo Syndrome in the United States.

Introduction: Sanfilippo syndrome is a rare disease and fatal genetic disorder with no FDA-approved treatment in the United States (US), and no comprehensive assessment of economic disease burden is available. Objectives: To develop a model to estimate the economic burden associated with Sanfilippo syndrome in the US using direct costs, indirect costs and valued intangibles (disability-adjusted life years, or DALYs) from 2023 onward. Design and Setting: A multistage comorbidity model was generated based on Sanfilippo syndrome symptoms, and disability weights from the 2010 Global Burden of Disease Study. Attributable increase in caregiver mental health burden were estimated using data from the CDC National Comorbidity Survey and retrospective studies on caregiver burden. Direct costs were approximated from the 2019 EveryLife Foundation survey, and indirect costs were estimated from Federal income data. Monetary valuations were adjusted to USD 2023 and given a 3% discount rate from 2023 onward. Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of Sanfilippo syndrome was calculated for each year, and year-over-year DALYs due to patient years lived with disability (YLDs) and years life lost (YLLs) were calculated by comparing to the health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE) in the US. Direct and indirect costs were calculated for each simulated patient from onset of symptoms to death. Results: From 2023-2043, overall economic burden in the US attributable to Sanfilippo syndrome was estimated to be $2.04 billion USD present value (2023) with current standard of care. The burden to individual families exceeded $8 million present value from time of birth per child born with Sanfilippo syndrome. Conclusion: Sanfilippo syndrome is a rare lysosomal storage disease, however the severe burden associated with the disease for individual families demonstrates a considerable cumulative impact. Our model represents the first disease burden value estimate associated with Sanfilippo syndrome, and underscores the substantial morbidity and mortality burden of Sanfilippo syndrome.

Trends, characteristics, race, and ethnicity associated with nonadherence to antidepressants among breast cancer survivors with depression.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in the United States, and half of breast cancer survivors experience major depressive disorders (hereafter depression). Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures evaluating depression treatment practices recommend uninterrupted antidepressant treatment for 3 months in the acute phase and 3 months in the continuation phase for the general population. However, little is known about the extent of and trends in antidepressant nonadherence among breast cancer survivors with depression, which may impact adherence to breast cancer treatment, potentially leading to breast cancer recurrence and other adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the trends and characteristics associated with antidepressant nonadherence among breast cancer survivors with depression in the United States. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results linked with Medicare data (2010-2019) for women with breast cancer and depression who newly initiated antidepressant use. Using HEDIS measures of nonadherence (ie, antidepressant prescription coverage ≤84 days of the 114-day acute phase or ≤180 days of the 231-day continuation phase), we calculated the annual crude prevalence of antidepressant nonadherence and examined trends using unadjusted logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression identified characteristics associated with antidepressant nonadherence. RESULTS: Among 9,452 eligible breast cancer survivors with depression (aged ≥65 years = 84% and White race = 82%), the crude prevalence of antidepressant nonadherence decreased from 2010 to 2019 for both the acute (49% to 40%; Ptrend<0.001) and continuation (67% to 57%; Ptrend<0.001) phases. Factors significantly associated with higher odds of antidepressant nonadherence in both the acute and continuation phases included Black race (odds ratios [ORs] [95% CI] for the acute/continuation phases: 2.0 [1.7-2.4]/2.0 [1.7-2.3]) and Hispanic ethnicity (1.5 [1.1-1.9]/2.2 [1.6-2.9]) compared with White race; receiving the first antidepressant from an oncologist vs a psychiatrist (1.4 [1.1-1.8]/1.6 [1.2-2.0]); and using antidepressants not recommended for older adults by the Beers criteria (2.2 [1.6-2.9]/2.0 [1.4-2.7]). Factors associated with lower odds of antidepressant nonadherence in both phases included receiving lymph node dissection (0.7 [0.5-0.9]/0.7 [0.5-0.9]), receiving endocrine therapy (0.9 [0.8-0.9]/0.8 [0.7-0.9]), having a higher National Cancer Institute comorbid index (0.8 [0.7-0.8]/0.9 [0.8-0.9]), having a follow-up visit with a psychiatrist (0.9 [0.8-0.9]/0.9 [0.8-0.9]), and switching to different antidepressants (0.7 [0.6-0.8]/0.7 [0.7-0.8]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite antidepressant nonadherence prevalence decreasing from 2010 to 2019, over half of breast cancer survivors with depression and Medicare were nonadherent in the continuation phase. Patients with identified nonadherence risk factors may benefit from close monitoring and targeted interventions. DISCLOSURES: Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic reported grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA044985 and R01DA050676), the National Institute on Aging (R21AG060308), the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH121907), Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, the Richard King Mellon Foundation at the University of Pittsburgh, the Clinical and Translational Science Institute of the University of Florida, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Foundation, and the US Department of Veterans Affairs outside the submitted work; in addition, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic has a patent pending for U1195.70174US00. Haesuk Park reported grants from Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program (ARISTA-USA) outside the submitted work. Juan M. Hincapie-Castillo reported grants from Merck outside the submitted work. Debbie Wilson reported grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Aging, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work; and serving as an editorial board member for the Journal of Pharmacy Technology. Ching-Yuan Chang's contributions to this manuscript were made while at the University of Florida College of Pharmacy. Ching-Yuan Chang is currently employed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vertex did not fund or have any involvement in this study or publication. Vakaramoko Diaby is currently employed by Otsuka, Inc. Otsuka did not fund or have any involvement in this study or publication. No other disclosures were reported.

Patient out-of-pocket and payer costs for pegfilgrastim originator vs biosimilars as primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in the first cycle among a commercially insured population.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether using pegfilgrastim biosimilars is cost saving in a real-world setting. OBJECTIVE: To compare medical costs including pegfilgrastim drug costs and febrile neutropenia (FN) treatment and management costs between pegfilgrastim biosimilars (pegfilgrastim-jmdb, pegfilgrastim-cbqv) and originator users for primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using 2019 IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases was conducted in adult patients with cancer initiating myelosuppressive chemotherapy courses. At least 2 diagnoses of the same cancer (at least 7 days apart) were required within 30 days of the chemotherapy initiation date. Pegfilgrastim (excluding on-body injector) costs included drug costs only (excluding administration fees). FN-related costs included all FN-related health care utilizations that were defined as having neutropenia, fever, or infection diagnosis. Per-patient per-cycle (PPPC) out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, health plan costs, and total costs were compared between originator (excluding on-body injector) and biosimilars users in the first cycle. A generalized linear model and a 2-part model were used. RESULTS: A total of 1,930 patients were included, of whom 884 (45.8%) used pegfilgrastim originator, 427 (22.1%) used pegfilgrastim-jmdb, and 619 (32.1%) used pegfilgrastim-cbqv. Adjusted PPPC OOP pegfilgrastim costs in the first cycle were significantly lower for the biosimilars vs the originator ($182 for pegfilgrastim-jmdb and $159 for pegfilgrastim-cbqv vs $299 for originator, P < 0.0001 for both comparisons). However, there was no difference in health plan costs ($5,783 for pegfilgrastim-jmdb and $5,845 for pegfilgrastim-cbqv vs $5,618 for originator) and total costs. In addition, no difference was observed for adjusted PPPC FN treatment and management OOP costs, health plan costs, and total costs in the first cycle. FN treatment OOP costs were $192 for originator, $197 for pegfilgrastim-jmdb (P = 0.958), and $240 for pegfilgrastim-cbqv (P = 0.680). FN treatment health plan costs were $2,804 for originator, $2,970 for pegfilgrastim-jmdb (P = 0.692), and $2,745 for pegfilgrastim-cbqv (P = 0.879). CONCLUSIONS: In a commercially insured population, using pegfilgrastim biosimilars in the first cycle for primary prophylaxis of FN led to cost savings for patients but not payers. No difference in FN-related costs was observed.