RESUMO
The selection of pharmacotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis aims to control the disease and depends on many factors. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines have considerably improved the treatment of allergic rhinitis. However, there is an increasing trend toward use of real-world evidence to inform clinical practice, especially because randomized controlled trials are often limited with regard to the applicability of results. The Contre les Maladies Chroniques pour un Vieillissement Actif (MACVIA) algorithm has proposed an allergic rhinitis treatment by a consensus group. This simple algorithm can be used to step up or step down allergic rhinitis treatment. Next-generation guidelines for the pharmacologic treatment of allergic rhinitis were developed by using existing GRADE-based guidelines for the disease, real-world evidence provided by mobile technology, and additive studies (allergen chamber studies) to refine the MACVIA algorithm.
Assuntos
Algoritmos , Asma , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Rinite Alérgica , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/imunologia , Asma/terapia , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Rinite Alérgica/terapiaRESUMO
Smart devices and Internet-based applications (apps) are largely used in allergic rhinitis and may help to address some unmet needs. However, these new tools need to first of all be tested for privacy rules, acceptability, usability, and cost-effectiveness. Second, they should be evaluated in the frame of the digital transformation of health, their impact on health care delivery, and health outcomes. This review (1) summarizes some existing mobile health apps for allergic rhinitis and reviews those in which testing has been published, (2) discusses apps that include risk factors of allergic rhinitis, (3) examines the impact of mobile health apps in phenotype discovery, (4) provides real-world evidence for care pathways, and finally (5) discusses mobile health tools enabling the digital transformation of health and care, empowering citizens, and building a healthier society.
Assuntos
Rinite Alérgica/diagnóstico , Smartphone , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Aplicativos Móveis , Fenótipo , Rinite Alérgica/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) organized the first European Strategic Forum on Allergic Diseases and Asthma. The main aim was to bring together all relevant stakeholders and decision-makers in the field of allergy, asthma and clinical Immunology around an open debate on contemporary challenges and potential solutions for the next decade. The Strategic Forum was an upscaling of the EAACI White Paper aiming to integrate the Academy's output with the perspective offered by EAACI's partners. This collaboration is fundamental for adapting and integrating allergy and asthma care into the context of real-world problems. The Strategic Forum on Allergic Diseases brought together all partners who have the drive and the influence to make positive change: national and international societies, patients' organizations, regulatory bodies and industry representatives. An open debate with a special focus on drug development and biomedical engineering, big data and information technology and allergic diseases and asthma in the context of environmental health concluded that connecting science with the transformation of care and a joint agreement between all partners on priorities and needs are essential to ensure a better management of allergic diseases and asthma in the advent of precision medicine together with global access to innovative and affordable diagnostics and therapeutics.
Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Financiamento de Capital , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Pesquisa , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/terapia , Big Data , Bioengenharia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Desenvolvimento de Medicamentos , Saúde Ambiental , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade/terapia , Ciência da Implementação , Tecnologia da Informação , Participação do Paciente , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/métodos , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Novel therapies such as type 2 targeting biologics are emerging treatment options for patients with chronic inflammatory respiratory diseases, fulfilling the needs of severely uncontrolled patients. The majority of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and over half of patients with asthma show a type 2 inflammatory signature in sinonasal mucosa and/or lungs. Importantly, both chronic respiratory diseases are frequent comorbidities, ensuring alleviation of both upper and lower airway pathology by systemic biological therapy. Type 2-targeting biologics such as anti-IgE, anti-IL4Rα, anti-IL5, and anti-IL5Rα have entered the market for selected pheno/endotypes of asthma patients and may soon also become available for CRSwNP patients. Given the high prevalence of chronic respiratory diseases and the high cost associated with biologics, patient selection is crucial in order to implement such therapies into chronic respiratory disease care pathways. The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) organized a multidisciplinary Expert Board Meeting to discuss the positioning of biologics into the care pathways for CRSwNP patients with and without comorbid asthma.
Assuntos
Asma/complicações , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Pólipos Nasais/complicações , Rinite/complicações , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/complicações , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/administração & dosagem , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Doença Crônica , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Comorbidade , Gerenciamento Clínico , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pesquisa , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a proven therapeutic option for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and/or asthma. Many guidelines or national practice guidelines have been produced but the evidence-based method varies, many are complex and none propose care pathways. This paper reviews care pathways for AIT using strict criteria and provides simple recommendations that can be used by all stakeholders including healthcare professionals. The decision to prescribe AIT for the patient should be individualized and based on the relevance of the allergens, the persistence of symptoms despite appropriate medications according to guidelines as well as the availability of good-quality and efficacious extracts. Allergen extracts cannot be regarded as generics. Immunotherapy is selected by specialists for stratified patients. There are no currently available validated biomarkers that can predict AIT success. In adolescents and adults, AIT should be reserved for patients with moderate/severe rhinitis or for those with moderate asthma who, despite appropriate pharmacotherapy and adherence, continue to exhibit exacerbations that appear to be related to allergen exposure, except in some specific cases. Immunotherapy may be even more advantageous in patients with multimorbidity. In children, AIT may prevent asthma onset in patients with rhinitis. mHealth tools are promising for the stratification and follow-up of patients.
Assuntos
Asma/terapia , Procedimentos Clínicos , Dessensibilização Imunológica , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Alérgenos/administração & dosagem , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/imunologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Biomarcadores , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Comorbidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dessensibilização Imunológica/efeitos adversos , Dessensibilização Imunológica/métodos , Gerenciamento Clínico , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Rinite Alérgica/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica/imunologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKROUND: Visual analogue scales (VAS) are psychometric measuring instruments designed to document the characteristics of disease-related symptom severity in individual patients and use this to achieve a rapid (statistically measurable and reproducible) classification of symptom severity and disease control. VAS can also be used in routine patient history taking and to monitor the course of a chronic disease such as allergic rhinitis (AR). More specifically, the VAS has been used to assess effectiveness of AR therapy in real life, both in intermittent and persistent disease. METHODS: This position paper takes a detailed look at the historical development of VAS and its method-specific principles. Particular focus is put on aspects of practical application in daily routine and on a critical discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the individual methods. RESULTS: VAS are well validated for the measurement of AR symptoms and correlate well with the ARIA (allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma) severity classification and also correlated well with rTNSS and RQLQ. Moreover, several treatment studies on AR have used VAS as an evaluation parameter. Thanks to the use of new (real-life and real-time) communication technologies, such as smartphone apps, Discussion: VAS can be used relatively simply and highly effectively to assess disease control. The VAS lends itself very well to digitization and has now been incorporated into a smartphone app (called Allergy Diary) to assess AR control and direct treatment decisions as part of an AR clinical decision support system (CDSS). MASK Rhinitis has developed this app, which is currently available in 15 different languages.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the impact of current European Union regulations on the availability of commercially available skin test allergens in European member states. RECENT FINDINGS: European Union legislations now define diagnostic allergens to be medicine requiring market authorization of every individual diagnostic allergen with obligations including clinical trials, application dossiers, a regular update of the dossiers, handling of variation processes and ongoing stability testing of the source material and periodic safety update reporting. The financial expenses of the initiation and maintenance of approvals for diagnostic allergens far exceed their related revenues. Thus, the numbers of authorized test allergens are steadily decreasing. SUMMARY: The current European Union regulations are anticipated to have an immense impact on in-vivo allergy diagnosis in Europe. Available skin test allergens decreased to less than half of what has been before in recent years. EAACI has addressed both the EU and EMA to resolve this situation.
Assuntos
Regulamentação Governamental , Hipersensibilidade/epidemiologia , Testes Cutâneos/normas , Alérgenos/imunologia , Animais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Europa (Continente) , União Europeia , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade/economia , Legislação como Assunto , Testes Cutâneos/economiaRESUMO
The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012 is the update of similar evidence based position papers published in 2005 and 2007.The document contains chapters on definitions and classification, we now also proposed definitions for difficult to treat rhinosinusitis, control of disease and better definitions for rhinosinusitis in children. More emphasis is placed on the diagnosis and treatment of acute rhinosinusitis. Throughout the document the terms chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps are used to further point out differences in pathophysiology and treatment of these two entities. There are extensive chapters on epidemiology and predisposing factors, inflammatory mechanisms, (differential) diagnosis of facial pain, genetics, cystic fibrosis, aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease, immunodeficiencies, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and the relationship between upper and lower airways. The chapters on paediatric acute and chronic rhinosinusitis are totally rewritten. Last but not least all available evidence for management of acute rhinosinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps in adults and children is analyzed and presented and management schemes based on the evidence are proposed.