Costs and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With NMO Spectrum Disorders and MOG-Antibody-Associated Disease: CHANCENMO Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). METHODS: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, data on consumption of medical and nonmedical resources and work ability were assessed via patient questionnaires. Costs were analyzed in Euros for 2018 from the societal perspective. HRQoL was captured by the EuroQoL Group 5 Dimension 5 Level Scale (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Clinical data were retrieved from the Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS) database. RESULTS: Two hundred twelve patients (80% women, median age 50 [19-83] years, median disease duration 7 [0-43] years, median Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score 3.5 [0-8.5], 66% aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G [IgG] positive, 22% MOG IgG positive, 12% double seronegative) were analyzed. The mean total annual per capita cost of illness accounted for €59,574 (95% CI 51,225-68,293 or US dollars [USD] 70,297, 95% CI 60,445-80,586), and the mean index value of the EQ-5D-5L was 0.693 (95% CI 0.65-0.73). The most important cost drivers were informal care costs (28% of total costs), indirect costs (23%), and drugs (16%), especially immunotherapeutics. Costs showed a positive correlation with disease severity (ρ = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.65); in the EDSS score 6.5 to 8.5 subgroup, the mean annual costs were €129,687 (95% CI 101,946-160,336 or USD 153,031, 95% CI 120,296-189,196). The HRQoL revealed a negative correlation to disease severity (ρ = -0.69, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.61); in the EDSS score 6.5 to 8.5 subgroup, the EQ-5D-5L mean index value was 0.195 (95% CI 0.13-0.28). Neither antibody status nor disease duration influenced the total annual costs or HRQoL. DISCUSSION: These German data from the era without approved preventive immunotherapies show enormous effects of the diseases on costs and quality of life. An early and cost-effective therapy should be provided to prevent long-term disability and to preserve quality of life.

Averting multiple sclerosis long-term societal and healthcare costs: The Value of Treatment (VoT) project.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent report on Value-of-Treatment (VoT) project highlights the need for early diagnosis-intervention, integrated, seamless care underpinning timely care pathways and access to best treatments. The VoT-multiple-sclerosis (MS) economic case study analysis aimed to estimate the effectiveness/cost-effectiveness of both early treatment and reducing MS risk factors (e.g. smoking and vitamin D insufficiency). METHODS: A series of decision analytical modellings were developed and applied to estimate the cost-effectiveness of: (1) reducing the conversion from clinically-isolated-syndrome (CIS) to clinically-definite-MS (CDMS); (2) smoking cessation and increase of 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) serum level. Both (1) and (2) considered socioeconomic impact on averted MS disability progression. Costs were reported for societal and healthcare provider perspectives (pending on data across nations; Euros). Effectiveness was expressed as Quality-Adjusted-Life-Years (QALYs) gains. Long term (25, 30, 40,50-years) and short (one-year) timelines were considered for (1) and (2), respectively. RESULTS: Early treatment was cost-effective for the health care provider and both cost-effective/cost-saving for the society across time-horizons and nations. Smoking cessation and an increase of 25(OH)D in MS patients were both cost-effective/cost-saving across nations. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, our work provides the first economic evidence to base appropriate public health interventions to reduce the MS burden in Europe.

Treatment benefit and daily drug costs associated with treating Parkinson's disease in a Parkinson's disease clinic.

OBJECTIVE: In some countries, such as Germany, there has been a move towards the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease in specialised inpatient units. However, data on patient outcome and the daily costs of antiparkinsonian drugs in these settings are rare. This study was conducted to determine the effect of an inpatient setting (a specialised Parkinson's disease clinic) on drug therapy costs and patient symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study involved 63 consecutively referred inpatients of a Parkinson's disease clinic. On entry to the clinic, the patients' antiparkinsonian drug regimen was titrated in order to improve their motor function. The daily costs of drug therapy per patient (in 2002 values) were calculated, and the severity of Parkinson's disease symptoms scored via scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and standardised instrumental procedures (peg insertion and tapping), both initially and at the end of the patients' stay in the clinic. The variables between the two evaluation timepoints were compared. RESULTS: The titration of antiparkinsonian drugs was associated with a significant decrease in the symptoms of Parkinson's disease at discharge from the clinic compared with admission (as measured by UPDRS total and subscale scores [all p < 0.001], and, to a lesser extent, by peg insertion and tapping [both p < 0.05]). A significant increase in daily drug costs (an increase of euro14.11 per patient for all drugs and euro12.36 per patient for antiparkinsonian drugs [both p <0.001]) was also observed. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the symptoms experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease improve after performance of antiparkinsonian drug titration within the setting of a specialised Parkinson's disease clinic. The effect on symptoms was seen most clearly with the UPDRS, although both peg insertion and tapping reflected this improvement to a certain extent. Drug titration resulted in, on average, a doubling of daily drug costs. Future trials are needed to investigate the long-term effects of such a hospital stay on indirect costs associated with treating Parkinson's disease, and on caregiver burden, and also to compare the efficacy of a Parkinson's disease clinic with an outpatient setting.

Treatment benefit correlates with increase of daily drug costs in Parkinson's disease clinics.

BACKGROUND: There is a move towards treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in specialized units, however, data on the outcome and on daily antiparkinsonian drug costs are rare. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to elucidate relationships between costs of drug treatment and efficacy of drug titration in a PD clinic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We calculated costs of drug therapy and scored severity of PD of 63 consecutively referred in-patients initially and at the end of their hospital stay under standardized conditions. RESULTS: Titration of antiparkinsonian drugs significantly induced a decrease of PD symptoms and an increase of daily drug costs. There were significant correlations between the degree of (i) improvement of the UPDRS score, (ii) increase of dopaminergic agents and (iii) change of corresponding daily antiparkinsonian drug costs. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of treatment in PD clinics, which results in increased daily antiparkinsonian drug costs due to elevated dopaminergic substitution.