RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Flexible cystoscopy is routinely performed as an outpatient procedure. The use of disposable sheaths can increase cystoscope life span and reduce staff costs. The primary end point of this study was to evaluate procedure related discomfort and pain, physician maneuverability, residual bioburden and reprocessing time. The secondary end point was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of a flexible cystoscope with a disposable sheath compared to a standard flexible cystoscope. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed with women older than 18 years, with intact cognition and 7 days antibiotic-free who were referred to outpatient clinic for cystoscopy. Patients underwent cystoscopy with a standard flexible cystoscope or flexible cystoscope with disposable sheath. Urinalysis and culture were performed before and 14 days after cystoscopy. Patients filled out a pain/discomfort visual analog scale. Physicians filled out a 5-point Likert scale for the elements of ease of insertion, manipulation, optical quality and overall use. Reprocessing time and costs were compared between both cystoscopes. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included in the study, comprised of 30 who underwent standard flexible cystoscopy and 30 who underwent flexible cystoscopy with a protective sheath. Patient discomfort/pain was equivalent in both groups. The Likert scores were similar except for ease of insertion, which was higher with protective sheaths (p <0.02). Protective sheaths were associated with lower reprocessing time and costs (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of protective sheaths effectively reduced procedure and staff related costs without causing any additional patient discomfort or pain. The learning curve of the sheathed scope may explain the difference reported by physicians regarding the ease of insertion.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether presentation, risk assessment, testing choices, and results differ by sex in stable symptomatic outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: Although established CAD presentations differ by sex, little is known about stable, suspected CAD. METHODS: The characteristics of 10,003 men and women in the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial were compared using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Sex differences in test selection and predictors of test positivity were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Women were older (62.4 years of age vs. 59.0 years of age) and were more likely to be hypertensive (66.6% vs. 63.2%), dyslipidemic (68.9% vs. 66.3%), and to have a family history of premature CAD (34.6% vs. 29.3) (all p values <0.005). Women were less likely to smoke (45.6% vs. 57.0%; p < 0.001), although their prevalence of diabetes was similar to that in men (21.8% vs. 21.0%; p = 0.30). Chest pain was the primary symptom in 73.2% of women versus 72.3% of men (p = 0.30), and was characterized as "crushing/pressure/squeezing/tightness" in 52.5% of women versus 46.2% of men (p < 0.001). Compared with men, all risk scores characterized women as being at lower risk, and providers were more likely to characterize women as having a low (<30%) pre-test probability of CAD (40.7% vs. 34.1%; p < 0.001). Compared with men, women were more often referred to imaging tests (adjusted odds ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.44) than nonimaging tests. Women were less likely to have a positive test (9.7% vs. 15.1%; p < 0.001). Although univariate predictors of test positivity were similar, in multivariable models, age, body mass index, and Framingham risk score were predictive of a positive test in women, whereas Framingham and Diamond and Forrester risk scores were predictive in men. CONCLUSIONS: Patient sex influences the entire diagnostic pathway for possible CAD, from baseline risk factors and presentation to noninvasive test outcomes. These differences highlight the need for sex-specific approaches for the evaluation of CAD.