Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 44(13): 937-942, 2019 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31205171

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the costs associated with nonoperative management (diagnosis and treatment) of cervical radiculopathy in the year prior to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While the costs of operative treatment have been previously described, less is known about nonoperative management costs of cervical radiculopathy leading up to surgery. METHODS: The Humana claims dataset (2007-2015) was queried to identify adult patients with cervical radiculopathy that underwent ACDF. Outcome endpoint was assessment of cumulative and per-capita costs for nonoperative diagnostic (x-rays, computed tomographic [CT], magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], electromyogram/nerve conduction studies [EMG/NCS]) and treatment modalities (injections, physical therapy [PT], braces, medications, chiropractic services) in the year preceding surgical intervention. RESULTS: Overall 12,514 patients (52% female) with cervical radiculopathy underwent ACDF. Cumulative costs and per-capita costs for nonoperative management, during the year prior to ACDF was $14.3 million and $1143, respectively. All patients underwent at least one diagnostic test (MRI: 86.7%; x-ray: 57.5%; CT: 35.2%) while 73.3% patients received a nonoperative treatment. Diagnostic testing comprised of over 62% of total nonoperative costs ($8.9 million) with MRI constituting the highest total relative spend ($5.3 million; per-capita: $489) followed by CT ($2.6 million; per-capita: $606), x-rays ($0.54 million; per-capita: $76), and EMG/NCS ($0.39 million; per-capita: $467). Conservative treatments comprised of 37.7% of the total nonoperative costs ($5.4 million) with injections costs constituting the highest relative spend ($3.01 million; per-capita: $988) followed by PT ($1.13 million; per-capita: $510) and medications (narcotics: $0.51 million, per-capita $101; gabapentin: $0.21 million, per-capita $93; NSAIDs: 0.107 million, per-capita $47), bracing ($0.25 million; per-capita: $193), and chiropractic services ($0.137 million; per-capita: $193). CONCLUSION: The study quantifies the cumulative and per-capital costs incurred 1-year prior to ACDF in patients with cervical radiculopathy for nonoperative diagnostic and treatment modalities. Approximately two-thirds of the costs associated with cervical radiculopathy are from diagnostic modalities. As institutions begin entering into bundled payments for cervical spine disease, understanding condition specific costs is a critical first step. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/economia , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/economia , Radiculopatia/economia , Radiculopatia/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais/tendências , Discotomia/economia , Discotomia/tendências , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Formulário de Reclamação de Seguro/tendências , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/economia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Masculino , Manipulação Quiroprática/economia , Manipulação Quiroprática/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos/tendências , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/economia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/tendências , Radiculopatia/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Fusão Vertebral/tendências , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/economia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Nutr ESPEN ; 29: 97-102, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30661708

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is a potentially modifiable risk factor associated with increased hospital charges, major wound complication, and fracture non-union after orthopaedic surgery. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between three nutrition screening tools and postoperative complications in patients undergoing acute fracture fixation. METHODS: Patients aged 18 or older undergoing acute operative fracture fixation at a Level I academic trauma center were screened upon admission using a malnutrition screening questionnaire (MSQ), and classified as low-, moderate- or high risk. Patients at moderate-to-high risk were assessed for clinical malnutrition by dietitian. Serum albumin, transferrin, total lymphocyte count, and 25(OH) Vitamin D were measured preoperatively. Primary outcome measures included twelve-month postoperative surgical and medical complications obtained by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Of 373 patients, 17% were moderate-to-high risk of malnutrition by MSQ. Clinical malnutrition was diagnosed by dietitian in 4.3% of patients assessed. Nearly half of all subjects had deficiency in one or more serum biomarkers. Cost of biomarker assays was $624 per patient. Medical or surgical complications occurred in 19% of patients. Dietitian diagnosed malnutrition (clinical malnutrition) was the strongest predictor of complication (OR 3.49, p = 0.017). Hypoalbuminemia was also associated with increased complication risk (OR 1.79, p = 0.045). MSQ score was not correlated with postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: Among the examined malnutrition screening tools, clinical malnutrition had the strongest association with postoperative complication. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased odds of complication, however there was a large false positive rate with all tested serum chemistries and high associated hospital charges compared to dietitian assessment. MSQ was a poor predictor of malnutrition and clinical outcome. Dietetic assessment is advised for orthopaedic trauma patients.


Assuntos
Desnutrição/complicações , Programas de Rastreamento , Doenças Musculoesqueléticas/complicações , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Nutricionistas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Desnutrição/sangue , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Albumina Sérica , Inquéritos e Questionários , Transferrina/análise , Vitamina D/sangue , Adulto Jovem
3.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 44(5): 334-345, 2019 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30074974

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of patient, hospital, and procedural characteristics on hospital costs and length hospital of stay (LOS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Successful bundled payment agreements require management of financial risk. Participating institutions must understand potential cost input before entering into these episodes-of-care payment contracts. Elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has become a popular target for early bundles given its frequency and predictability. METHODS: A national discharge database was queried to identify adult patients undergoing elective ACDF. Using generalized linear models, the impact of each patient, hospital, and procedures characteristic on hospitalization costs and the LOS was estimated. RESULTS: In 2011, 134,088 patients underwent ACDF in the United States. Of these 31.6% had no comorbidities, whereas 18.7% had three or more. The most common conditions included hypertension (44.4%), renal disease (15.9%), and depression (14.7%). Mean hospital costs after ACDF was $18,622 and mean hospital LOS was 1.7 days. With incremental comorbidities, both hospital costs and LOS increased. Both marginal costs and LOS rose with inpatient death (+$17,181, +2.0 days), patients with recent weight loss (+$8351, +1.24 days), metastatic cancer (+$6129 +0.80 days), electrolyte disturbances (+$4175 +0.8 days), pulmonary-circulatory disorders (+$4065, +0.6 days), and coagulopathies (+$3467, +0.58 days). Costs and LOS were highest with the following procedures: addition of a posterior fusion/instrumentation ($+11,189, +0.9 days), revision anterior surgery (+$3465, +0.3 days), and fusion of more than three levels (+$3251, +0.2 days). Patients treated in the West had the highest costs (+$9300, +0.3 days). All P values were less than 0.05. CONCLUSION: Hospital costs and LOS after ACDF rise with increasing patient comorbidities. Stakeholders entering into bundled payments should be aware of that certain patient, hospital, and procedure characteristics will consume greater resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Assuntos
Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Discotomia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Fusão Vertebral/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Discotomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reoperação/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA