Use of combinations of antipsychotics: McLean Hospital inpatients, 2002.

BACKGROUND: The empirical use of combinations of antipsychotic agents appears to be increasing with little research support for the relative efficacy, safety or cost-effectiveness of this practice. Such treatment was evaluated in hospitalized psychiatric patients. METHODS: Samples of consecutive inpatients treated with > or = 2 ('polytherapy') vs 1 antipsychotic ('monotherapy') were matched on age, sex, diagnosis and admission clinical ratings, and these groups were compared on total daily chlorpromazine-equivalent doses, days in hospital, and changes in clinical ratings between admission and discharge. RESULTS: The study sample included 69 polytherapy and 115 well-matched monotherapy subjects. Despite matching for initial CGI and GAF ratings, polytherapy was associated with high PANSS subscale scores of positive symptoms among affective psychosis, and relatively greater PANSS subscale ratings of excitement-agitation among patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. Estimated clinical improvement during hospitalization was similar among poly- and monotherapy patients, but total daily CPZ-eq doses at discharge averaged twice-greater with polytherapy, and hospitalization lasted 1.5 times longer. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic polytherapy as well as the types of agents combined may reflect clinician responses to particular symptom patterns. The value of specific combinations of antipsychotic agents and their comparison with monotherapies requires specific, prospective, randomized and well-controlled trials that consider matching on clinical characteristics and truly comparable doses across regimens.

Evaluation of the adequacy of outpatient antidepressant treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Most studies evaluating the adequacy of antidepressant treatment have focused on the relatively small segment of the medicated population with a diagnosis of depression. This study assessed the rates and determinants of the adequacy of antidepressant treatment among all outpatients who receive antidepressants. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using pharmacy claims made by patients with a primary care physician in a managed care plan at an academic medical center from 1996 through 1999. Adequate antidepressant treatment was defined as prescription of the lowest likely effective dosage of an antidepressant for at least 90 consecutive days. Data for a total of 15,476 records and 1,550 patients were available. RESULTS: Overall, 46 percent of the patients receiving antidepressants received minimally adequate treatment. The rates of adequate treatment were significantly higher among patients whose antidepressant prescriptions were written by both primary care physicians and psychiatrists than among patients whose antidepressants were prescribed solely by primary care physicians (61 percent versus 31 percent). Patients who had trials of SSRIs had significantly higher rates of treatment adequacy than those who had trials of tricyclic antidepressants but not SSRIs (51 percent compared with 27 percent) or trials with other antidepressants only (24 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy claims from all patients receiving antidepressants indicate that these drugs are prescribed in ways that are unlikely to be fully effective across the broad spectrum of patients. Adequate antidepressant treatment trials were most likely when psychiatrists collaborated with primary care physicians or other specialists and when SSRIs were used.

Vasomotor symptoms are associated with depression in perimenopausal women seeking primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relationship between vasomotor symptoms (hot flushes and night sweats) and depression in perimenopausal women with that in postmenopausal and older premenopausal women. DESIGN: Questionnaire data assessing current depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), hot flushes, night sweats, menopausal status, depression history, hormonal therapy use, and demographic characteristics were collected from women aged 40 to 60 years seeking primary care. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship between vasomotor symptoms and depression. RESULTS: Depression (defined by a Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score >/= 25) was observed in 14.9% of 141 perimenopausal women, 13.9% of 151 postmenopausal women, and 7.6% of 184 older premenopausal women. Recent vasomotor symptoms were reported by 53.9% of perimenopausal women, 43.7% of postmenopausal women, and 20.7% of older premenopausal women. Perimenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms were 4.39 times more likely to be depressed than those without vasomotor symptoms (95% CI, 1.40-13.83), an association that did not change after controlling for depression history. In contrast with perimenopausal women, postmenopausal and older premenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms did not have a significantly greater risk for depression than women of the same menopausal status without vasomotor symptoms (adjusted odds ratios, 1.28 and 1.77; 95% CI, 0.47-3.46 and 0.53-5.89, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Hot flushes and night sweats are associated with depression in perimenopausal women. Further investigation is warranted to elucidate the mechanism by which hot flushes may be associated with depression in perimenopausal women and not in postmenopausal or older premenopausal women.