Factors Associated With Performing IPAA After Total Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: IPAA is considered the procedure of choice for restorative surgery after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Previous studies have examined the rate of IPAA within individual states but not at the national level in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the rate of IPAA after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis in a national population and identify factors associated with IPAA. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was performed in the United States. PATIENTS: Patients who were aged 18 years or older and who underwent total colectomy between 2009 and 2019 for a diagnosis of ulcerative colitis were identified within a commercial database. This database excluded patients with public insurance, including all patients older than 65 years with Medicare. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was IPAA. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between covariates and the likelihood of undergoing IPAA. RESULTS: In total, 2816 patients were included, of whom 1414 (50.2%) underwent IPAA, 928 (33.0%) underwent no further surgery, and 474 (16.8%) underwent proctectomy with end ileostomy. Younger age, lower comorbidities, elective case, and laparoscopic approach in the initial colectomy were significantly associated with IPAA but socioeconomic status was not. LIMITATIONS: This retrospective study included only patients with commercial insurance. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 50.2% of patients who had total colectomy for ulcerative colitis underwent IPAA, and younger age, lower comorbidities, and elective cases are associated with a higher rate of IPAA placement. This study emphasizes the importance of ensuring follow-up with colorectal surgeons to provide the option of restorative surgery, especially for patients undergoing urgent or emergent colectomies. See Video Abstract . FACTORES ASOCIADOS CON LA REALIZACIN DE ANASTOMOSIS ANALBOLSA ILEAL DESPUS DE UNA COLECTOMA TOTAL POR COLITIS ULCEROSA: ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis ileo-anal se considera el procedimiento de elección para la cirugía reparadora tras la colectomía total por colitis ulcerosa. Estudios previos han examinado la tasa de anastomosis ileo-anal dentro de los estados individuales, pero no a nivel nacional en los Estados Unidos.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la tasa de anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal después de la colectomía total para la colitis ulcerosa en una población nacional e identificar los factores asociados con la anastomosis bolsa ileal-anal.DISEÑO:Se trata de un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo.LUGAR:Este estudio se realizó en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Los pacientes que tenían ≥18 años de edad que se sometieron a colectomía total entre 2009 y 2019 para un diagnóstico de colitis ulcerosa fueron identificados dentro de una base de datos comercial. Esta base de datos excluyó a los pacientes con seguro público, incluidos todos los pacientes >65 años con Medicare.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:El resultado primario fue la anastomosis ileal bolsa-anal. Se utilizó una regresión logística multivariable para evaluar la asociación entre las covariables y la probabilidad de someterse a una anastomosis ileal.RESULTADOS:En total, se incluyeron 2.816 pacientes, de los cuales 1.414 (50,2%) se sometieron a anastomosis ileo-anal, 928 (33,0%) no se sometieron a ninguna otra intervención quirúrgica y 474 (16,8%) se sometieron a proctectomía con ileostomía terminal. La edad más joven, las comorbilidades más bajas, el caso electivo, y el abordaje laparoscópico en la colectomía inicial se asociaron significativamente con la anastomosis ileal bolsa-anal, pero no el estatus socioeconómico.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio retrospectivo incluyó sólo pacientes con seguro comercial.CONCLUSIONES:Un 50,2% de los pacientes se someten a anastomosis ileo-anal y la edad más joven, las comorbilidades más bajas y los casos electivos se asocian con una mayor tasa de colocación de anastomosis ileo-anal. Esto subraya la importancia de asegurar el seguimiento con cirujanos colorrectales para ofrecer la opción de cirugía reparadora, especialmente en pacientes sometidos a colectomías urgentes o emergentes. (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

Development of the Endoscopic Pouch Score for Assessment of Inflammatory Conditions of the Pouch.

Pouchoscopy provides a critical objective measure in the evaluation of patients with suspected inflammatory conditions of the pouch; however, there remain significant gaps in the reliability of the endoscopic scales used in the assessment of these conditions.1,2 Reliability and reproducibility in the assessment of patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are critical, as evidenced by recent efforts to improve standardization in the evaluation of patients with pouch-related disorders.3.

Patients With Pouchitis Demonstrate a Significant Cost Burden in the First Two Years After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis.

Pouchitis, the most common long-term complication after colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC), can lead to increased health care costs and diminished quality of life.1 In this study, we aimed to compare the total costs among patients diagnosed with pouchitis in the first 2 years after an IPAA with those among patients who were not diagnosed with pouchitis, using a large administrative claims database. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the specific drivers of cost among patients with an IPAA during the 2-year study period, including inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and pharmacy-related costs.

Endoscopic and Histological Assessment, Correlation, and Relapse in Clinically Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis (MARQUEE).

OBJECTIVE: It is difficult to predict relapse in quiescent ulcerative colitis (UC), but newer endoscopic and histological indices could improve this. This study aimed to determine in UC patients in clinical remission (1) the prevalence of active endoscopic and histological disease; (2) the correlation between endoscopic and histological scores; and (3) the predictive power of these scores for clinical relapse. DESIGN: This multicenter prospective cohort study conducted by the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation Clinical Research Alliance included 100 adults with UC in clinical remission undergoing surveillance colonoscopy for dysplasia. Endoscopic activity was assessed using the Mayo endoscopic score (MES), ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS), and ulcerative colitis colonoscopic index of severity (UCCIS). Histology was assessed with the Riley index subcomponents, total Riley score, and basal plasmacytosis. RESULTS: Only 5% of patients had an MES of 0, whereas 38% had a score of 2 to 3; using the UCEIS, the majority of patients had at least mild activity, and 15% had more severe activity. Many patients also had evidence of histological disease activity. The correlations among endoscopic indices, histological subcomponents, and total score were low; the highest correlations occurred with the subcomponent architectural irregularity (ρ = 0.43-0.44), total Riley score (ρ = 0.35-0.37), and basal plasmacytosis (ρ = 0.35-0.36). Nineteen patients relapsed clinically over 1 year, with the subcomponent architectural irregularity being the most predictive factor (P = 0.0076). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter prospective study found a high prevalence of both endoscopic and histological disease activity in clinically quiescent UC. The correlations between endoscopy and histology were low, and the power to predict clinical relapse was moderate.

Lack of Difference in Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Between Black and White Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background: Previous reports have shown differences in phenotypes among black patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) compared with other racial groups, but prior studies were limited by small numbers of black patients and cross-sectional analyses. We used data from the Sinai-Helmsley Alliance for Research Excellence cohort to compare phenotypes and treatment patterns of black and white patients with IBD in a prospective study. Methods: We compared phenotypes, IBD-specific therapies, and health care utilization among black and white patients with IBD. For all analyses, we performed bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. Results: Among 5537 patients with IBD, 314 (6%) reported black race. Black patients were more likely to report a Crohn's disease (CD)-related complication at baseline (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.95). Black patients with CD were more likely to develop a new abscess (aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.31-3.93) and initiate an anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy during follow-up (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.09-3.14). Black patients with ulcerative colitis were more likely to have proctitis (24% vs 13%, P = 0.033) at baseline. There were no differences in surgery or hospitalization rates during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Black patients with CD demonstrated increased complications at baseline and during follow-up in this cohort. Despite more complicated disease, black and white patients with IBD were generally given the same medications and experienced similar rates of hospitalization and surgery during the study period. In our multicenter cohort, clinical outcomes among black and white patients with IBD were similar.

Methotrexate: underused and ignored?

For more than a decade, methotrexate has been known to be an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of steroid-dependent active Crohn's disease. However, international data on medication utilization suggest that this drug is rarely used in clinical practice for an indication of Crohn's disease. This review investigates the potential reasons for the underuse of methotrexate in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.