The role of clinical assessment and electrophysiology study in Brugada syndrome patients with syncope.

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic syncope in Brugada syndrome (BrS) increases the risk of major events. Nevertheless, clinical differentiation between cardiogenic and vasovagal syncope can be challenging. We characterized the long-term incidence of major events in a large cohort of BrS patients who presented with syncope. METHODS: From a total of 474 patients, syncope was the initial manifestation in 135 (28.5%) individuals (43.9 ±â€¯13.9 years, 71.1% male). The syncope was classified prospectively as cardiogenic, vasovagal, or undefined if unclear characteristics were present. Clinical, electrocardiographic, genetic, and electrophysiologic features were analyzed. Cardiogenic syncope, sustained ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death were considered major events in follow-up. RESULTS: In 66 patients (48.9%), the syncope was cardiogenic; in 51 (37.8%), vasovagal and in 18 (13.3%); undefined. The electrophysiology study (EPS) inducibility was more frequent in patients with cardiogenic syncope and absent in all patients with undefined syncope (28 [53.8%] vs 5 [12.2%] vs 0 [0%]; P < .01). During follow-up (7.7 ±â€¯5.6 years), only patients with cardiogenic syncope presented major events (16 [11.9%]). Among patients with inducible EPS, 7 (21.2%) presented major events (P = .04). The negative predictive value of the EPS for major events was 92.4%. The incidence rate of major events was 2.6% person-year. Parameters associated with major events included cardiogenic syncope (hazard ratio [HR] 6.3; 95% CI 1.1-10.4; P = .05), spontaneous type 1 electrocardiogram (HR 3.7; 95% CI 1.3-10.5; P = .01), and inducible EPS (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-8.8; P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: An accurate syncope classification is crucial in BrS patients for risk stratification. In patients with syncope of unclear characteristics, the EPS may be helpful to prevent unnecessary implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Brugada syndrome in the young: an assessment of risk factors predicting future events.

AIMS: To investigate the clinical characteristics, prognoses, and presence of risk factors in young patients with Brugada syndrome (BS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A consecutive cohort of 128 young BS patients (≤25 years old at diagnosis) was analysed. Eighty-eight patients (69%) were asymptomatic, whereas 40 (31%) presented with clinical manifestations of BS. Markers of prognosis and risk were identified upon comparison of these two groups. A history of malignant syncope was strong predictors of ventricular arrhythmic events. Family history of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and mutations in the SCN5A gene did not associate with increased risk. Symptomatic patients presented with significantly abnormal baseline electrical characteristics when compared with the asymptomatic cohort, including spontaneous type I electrocardiograph (ECG) patterns, sinus node dysfunction (SND), first-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, and intra-ventricular conduction delay. The symptomatic group more frequently exhibited atrial arrhythmias. Electrophysiological studies resulted positive more frequently in symptomatic patients, but no risk association for future events could be determined. During the follow-up period (mean: 65 months), 10 arrhythmic events occurred in nine symptomatic patients (event rate: 4.5% per year). No events occurred in the asymptomatic group. Variables significantly associated with arrhythmic events during follow-up were presence of symptoms at diagnosis and spontaneous type I ECG. The presence of atrial arrhythmias and conduction abnormalities was also associated with the risk of arrhythmic events during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic BS in the young age is a rare but malignant condition that can manifest with a spectrum of electrical abnormalities (i.e. SND, atrial tachycardias, AV block, and infra-nodal conduction delay) and result in the extreme cases in lethal arrhythmic events and SCD.