Does Medicare Insurance Mitigate Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Access to Lumbar Spinal Surgery When Compared to Commercial Insurance?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Compare disparities in lumbar surgical care utilization in Commercially insured versus Medicare patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While disparities in spinal surgery have been previously described, less evidence exists on effective strategies to mitigate them. Theoretically, universal health care coverage under Medicare should improve health care access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Utilizing National Inpatient Sample data (2003-2018), we included inpatient lumbar discectomy or laminectomy/fusion cases in black, white, or Hispanic patients aged 18-74 years, with Commercial or Medicare insurance. A multivariable Poisson distribution model determined race/ethnicity subgroup-specific rate ratios (RRs) of patients undergoing lumbar surgery compared to their respective population distribution (using US Census data) based on race/ethnicity, region, gender, primary payor, and age (Commercially insured age subgroups: 18-39, 40-54, and 55-64 y; Medicare age subgroup: 65-74 y). RESULTS: Of the 2,310,956 lumbar spine procedures included, 88.9%, 6.1%, and 5.0% represented white, black, and Hispanic patients, respectively. Among Commercially insured patients, black and Hispanic (compared to white) patients had lower rates of surgical care utilization; however, these disparities decreased with increasing age: black (RR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.37-0.38) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.52-0.54) aged 18-39 years versus black (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.71-0.73) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.63-0.65) aged 55-64 years. Racial/ethnic disparities persisted in Medicare patients, especially when compared to the neighboring age subgroup that was Commercially insured: black (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.62) and Hispanic patients (RR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.60-0.61) under Medicare. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in surgical care utilization among black and Hispanic patients persist regardless of health care coverage, and an expansion of Medicare eligibility alone may not comprehensively address health care disparities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Assessment of Risk Factors and Rate of Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty Within 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy Utilizing a Large Database of Commercially Insured Patients in the United States.

Background: The conversion rate of hip arthroscopy (HA) to total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be as high as 10%. Despite identifying factors that increase the risk of conversion, current studies do not stratify patients by type of arthroscopic procedure. Purpose/Hypothesis: To analyze the rate and predictors of conversion to THA within 2 years after HA. It was hypothesized that osteoarthritis (OA) and increased patient age would negatively affect the survivorship of HA. Study Design: Cohort study; Evidence level, 3. Methods: The IBM MarketScan database was utilized to identify patients who underwent HA and converted to THA within 2 years at inpatient and outpatient facilities between 2013 and 2017. Patients were split into 3 procedure cohorts as follows: (1) femoroacetabular osteoplasty (FAO), which included treatment for femoroacetabular impingement; (2) isolated debridement; and (3) isolated labral repair. Cohort characteristics were compared using standardized differences. Conversion rates between the 3 cohorts were compared using chi-square tests. The relationship between age and conversion was assessed using linear regression. Predictors of conversion were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The median time to conversion was estimated using Kaplan-Meier tests. Results: A total of 5048 patients were identified, and the rates of conversion to THA were 12.86% for isolated debridement, 8.67% for isolated labral repair, and 6.76% for FAO (standardized difference, 0.138). The isolated labral repair cohort had the shortest median time to conversion (isolated labral repair, 10.88 months; isolated debridement, 10.98 months; and FAO, 11.9 months [P = .034). For patients >50 years, isolated debridement had the highest rate of conversion at 18.8%. The conversion rate increased linearly with age. Factors that increased the odds of conversion to THA were OA, having an isolated debridement procedure, and older patient age (P < .05). Conclusion: Older patients and those with preexisting OA of the hip were at a significantly increased risk of failing HA and requiring a total hip replacement within 2 years of the index procedure. Younger patients were at low risk of requiring a conversion procedure no matter which arthroscopic procedure was performed.

There Is Wide Variation in Platelet-rich Plasma Injection Pricing: A United States Nationwide Study of Top Orthopaedic Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Demand for platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for osteoarthritis has dramatically increased in recent years despite conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy and highly variable pricing in the top orthopaedic centers in the United States, because PRP is typically not covered by insurance. A previous study investigating the mean price of PRP injections obtained information only from centers advertising online the availability of PRP injections. Thus, there is a need for further clarification of the overall availability and variability in cost of PRP injections in the orthopaedic community as well as an analysis of relevant regional demographic and hospital characteristics that could be associated with PRP pricing. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our study purposes were to (1) report the availability and price variation of knee PRP injections at top-ranked United States orthopaedic centers, (2) characterize the availability of pricing information for a PRP injection over the telephone, (3) determine whether hospital characteristics (Orthopaedic Score [ U . S. News & World Report measure of hospital orthopaedic department performance], size, teaching status, and rural-urban status) were associated with PRP injection availability and pricing, and (4) characterize the price variation, if it exists, of PRP injections in three metropolitan areas and individual institutions. METHODS: In this prospective study, a scripted telephone call to publicly listed clinic telephone numbers was used to determine the availability and price estimate (amount to be paid by the patient) of a PRP injection for knee osteoarthritis from the top 25 hospitals from each United States Census region selected from the U.S. News & World Report ranking of best hospitals for orthopaedics. Univariable analyses examined factors associated with PRP injection availability and willingness to disclose pricing, differences across regions, and the association between hospital characteristics (Orthopaedic Score, size, teaching status, and rural-urban status) and pricing. The Orthopaedic Score is a score assigned to each hospital by U . S. News & World Report as a measure of hospital performance based partly on patient outcomes, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 87% (87 of 100) of respondents stated they offered PRP injections. Pricing ranged from USD 350 to USD 2815 (median USD 800) per injection, with the highest prices in the Northeast. The largest price range was in the Midwest, where more than two-thirds of PRP injections given at hospitals that disclosed pricing cost USD 500 to USD 1000. Of the hospitals that offered PRP injections, 68% (59 of 87) were willing to disclose price information over the telephone. PRP injection pricing was inversely correlated with hospital Orthopaedic Score (-3% price change [95% CI -5% to -1%]; p = 0.01) and not associated with any of the other hospital characteristics that were studied, such as patient population median income and total hospital expenses. An intracity analysis revealed wide variations in PRP pricing in all metropolitan areas that were analyzed, ranging from a minimum of USD 300 within 10 miles of metropolitan area B to a maximum of USD 1269 within 20 miles of metropolitan area C. CONCLUSION: We found that although PRP injections are widely available, pricing continues to be a substantial financial burden on patients, with large price variability among institutions. We also found that if patients are willing to shop around in a metropolitan area, there is potential to save a meaningful amount of money. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As public interest in biologics in orthopaedic surgery increases, knowledge of its pricing should be clarified to consumers. The debated efficacy of PRP injections, combined with our findings that it is an expensive out-of-pocket procedure, suggests that PRP has limited cost-effectiveness, with variable, discrete pricing. As such, the price of PRP injections should be clearly disclosed to patients so they can make informed healthcare decisions.

Hip Arthroscopy Trends: Increasing Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs, Lower Surgeon Reimbursement, and Cost Reduction With Utilization of Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

PURPOSE: To (1) report on trends in immediate procedure reimbursement, patient out-of-pocket expenditures, and surgeon reimbursement in hip arthroscopy (2) compare trends in ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) versus outpatient hospitals (OH) utilization; (3) quantify the cost differences (if any) associated with ASC versus OH settings; and 4) determine the factors that predict ASC utilization for hip arthroscopy. METHODS: The cohort for this descriptive epidemiology study was any patient over 18 years identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims Encounter database who underwent an outpatient hip arthroscopy, identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes, in the United States from 2013 to 2017. Immediate procedure reimbursement, patient out-of-pocket expenditure, and surgeon reimbursement were calculated, and a multivariable model was used to determine the influence of specific factors on these outcome variables. Statistically significant P values were less than .05, and significant standardized differences were more than 0.1. RESULTS: The cohort included 20,335 patients. An increasing trend in ASC utilization was observed (P = .001), and ASC utilization for hip arthroscopy was 32.4% in 2017. Patient out-of-pocket expenditures for femoroacetabular impingement surgery increased 24.3% over the study period (P = .003), which was higher than the rate for immediate procedure reimbursement (4.2%; P = .007). ASCs were associated with $3,310 (28.8%; P = .001) reduction in immediate procedure reimbursement and $47 (6.2%; P = .001) reduction in patient out-of-pocket expenditure per hip arthroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: ASCs provide a significant cost difference for hip arthroscopy. Although there is an increasing trend toward ASC utilization, it remains relatively low at 32.4% in 2017. Thus, there are opportunities for expanded ASC utilization, which is associated with significant immediate procedure reimbursement difference of $3,310 and patient out-of-pocket expenditure difference of $47 per hip arthroscopy case, ultimately benefiting healthcare systems, surgeons, and patients alike. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Ambulatory Surgery Centers Significantly Decrease Total Health Care Expenditures in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure. The volume and cost of ACLR procedures are increasing annually, but the drivers of these cost increases are not well described. PURPOSE: To analyze the modifiable drivers of total health care utilization (THU), immediate procedure reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement for patients undergoing ACLR using a large national commercial insurance database from 2013 to 2017. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: For this study, the cohort consisted of patients identified in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database who underwent outpatient arthroscopic ACLR in the United States from 2013 to 2017. Patients with Current Procedural Terminology code 29888 were included. THU was defined as the sum of any payment related to the ACLR procedure from 90 days preoperatively to 180 days postoperatively. A multivariable model was utilized to describe the patient- and procedure-related drivers of THU, immediate procedure reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement. RESULTS: There were 34,862 patients identified. On multivariable analysis, the main driver of THU and immediate procedure reimbursement was an outpatient hospital as the surgical setting (US$6789 increase in THU). The main driver of surgeon reimbursement was an out-of-network surgeon (US$1337 increase). Health maintenance organization as the insurance plan type decreased THU, immediate procedure reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement (US$955, US$108, and US$38 decrease, respectively, compared with preferred provider organization; P < .05 for all). CONCLUSION: Performing procedures in more cost-efficient ambulatory surgery centers had the largest effect on decreasing health care expenditures for ACLR. Health maintenance organizations aided in cost-optimization efforts as well, but had a minor effect on surgeon reimbursement. Overall, this study increases transparency into what drives reimbursement and serves as a foundation for how to decrease health care expenditures related to ACLR.