[Postpartum Care by Midwives: Socioeconomic Status has a Strong Influence on the Amount of Care Received An Analysis with Routine Data from BARMER Health Insurance]. / Aufsuchende Wochenbettbetreuung: Die sozioökonomische Lage hat einen starken Einfluss auf den Betreuungsumfang Eine Analyse mit Routinedaten der BARMER.

BACKGROUND: Socio-economic situation is associated with inequalities in access to health care and health-related resources. This also applies to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period. Compared to other European countries, Germany has very good care options for the postpartum period. It has an unique system of postpartum care, which comprises home visits by midwives for 12 weeks after birth and beyond in problem cases and thus has structurally good care options. So far, however, there are hardly any studies based on routine data that show which mothers receive homevisits in postpartum care and to what extent. METHOD: The study population comprised 199,978 women insured with BARMER who gave birth to at least one child in the years 2017-2020. Some women were pregnant several times in this period of time. The services billed by freelance midwives for outreach midwifery care in the puerperium were considered for 227,088 births, taking into account the socioeconomic situation of the mothers. RESULTS: According to the definition of the German Institute for Economic Research, 26% of the mothers belonged to a low income group, 46% to a medium income group and 29% to a high income group. Similar to what was shown for midwifery care during pregnancy, large differences were also found with regard to postpartum care: While 90.5% of the women with a high income received home visits, only 83.5% of women with a medium income did so, and only 67.9% of women with a low income. The groups did not differ with regard to other characteristics such as rate of caesarean section, preterm births, twins, age or concomitant diseases to an extent that could explain the differences in care. Women who had received midwifery services in pregnancy were much more likely to receive home visits by a midwife in the postpartum period. Furthermore, there was a correlation with the density of midwives in the respective region. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that access to home-based postpartum care by freelance midwives is significantly limited for low-income women. In contrast to antenatal care, women in the postpartum period cannot switch to other service providers, as outreach postpartum care is a reserved activity of midwives. Women with low incomes thus receive less midwifery care, although they have a higher need for support (Eickhorst et al. 2016).

Multilevel Quality Indicators: Methodology and Monte Carlo Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Quality indicators are frequently used to assess the performance of health care providers, in particular hospitals. Established approaches to the design of such indicators are subject to distortions due to indirect standardization and high variance of estimators. Indicators for geographical regions are rarely considered. OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate a methodology of multilevel quality indicators (MQIs) for both health care providers and geographical regions. RESEARCH DESIGN: We formally derived MQIs from a statistical multilevel model, which may include characteristics of patients, providers, and regions. We used Monte Carlo simulation to assess the performance of MQIs relative to established approaches based on the standardized mortality/morbidity ratio (SMR) and the risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR). MEASURES: Rank correlation between true provider/region effects and quality indicator estimates; shares of the 10% best and 10% worst providers identified by the quality indicators. RESULTS: The proposed MQIs are (1) standardized hospital outcome rate (SHOR), (2) regional SHOR, and (3) regional standardized patient outcome rate. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that the SHOR provides substantially better estimates of provider performance than the SMR and risk-standardized mortality rate in almost all scenarios. The regional standardized patient outcome rate was slightly more stable than the regional SMR. We also found that modeling of regional characteristics generally improves the adequacy of provider-level estimates. CONCLUSIONS: MQIs methodology facilitates adequate and efficient estimation of quality indicators for both health care providers and geographical regions.

[Healthcare in Pregnancy and Access to Midwives according to Socio-Economic Situation: An Analysis with Routine Data from BARMER Health Insurance]. / Schwangerenversorgung und Zugang zur Hebamme nach sozialem Status: Eine Analyse mit Routinedaten der BARMER.

BACKGROUND: Socio-economic status is an important cause of inequality in health status and access to healthcare. This also applies to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum period. Healthcare during pregnancy plays a crucial role in the success of the life phase around birth. On the basis of routine data from BARMER health insurance, the study investigated which services pregnant women received during pregnancy depending on their socio-economic situation. METHODS: The study population comprised 237,251 women insured with BARMER with 278,237 births in 2015-2019. The services billed by gynaecologists and midwives during pregnancy were considered in relation to the socio-economic situation of the women involved. RESULTS: Physicians dominated the provision of preventive healthcare. For almost 98% of the pregnant women, a medical preventive healthcare flat rate was billed in at least three quarters. A regular participation of the midwife in preventive healthcare from the fourth month of pregnancy with more than four preventive services was the case in only 1.2% of women. Women from low-income backgrounds received fewer antenatal healthcare services from both gynaecologists and midwives, with 31% of women with low income having no antenatal midwife contact at all, compared to only 11% of high-income women. High-income earning women were also more likely to have had early contact with a midwife (47 vs. 37% in the first trimester). The timing of the first contact seemed to be relevant for the subsequent cooperative antenatal healthcare by both professional groups. CONCLUSION: The potentials of midwifery healthcare are not being leveraged. Midwives should be significantly more involved in prenatal healthcare overall, and access to midwives must be improved, especially for socially disadvantaged women. These women could benefit in particular from midwifery healthcare, as it takes greater account of social aspects in healthcare and also provides outreach services.