Disentangling the concept of "the complex older patient" in general practice: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The rising life expectancy in the developed world leads to an increase in the number of older patients and the complexity of their complaints in general practice. Although interventions and support for general practitioners are available, implementation lags. Knowledge on what determines a complex older patient, the problems of which general practitioners encounter and the situations they actually need support for, is necessary for better implementation. METHODS: To provide support to general practitioners in their struggle with complex older patients, the aim of this research was to disentangle the concept of the complex older patient in general practice. A qualitative approach was used consisting of 15 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners. The general practitioner was asked to prepare a case of a complex older patient out of their own practice that could be discussed during the interview. Transcripts of the interview were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Analysis of the interviews resulted in twelve themes that could be categorised into five factors that contribute to the complexity of cases of older patients. The five factors are: not being in charge, different views on necessary care, encountering the boundaries of medicine, limits to providing social care, ill-equipped. CONCLUSION: The factors that were found imply that a better organisational structure for elderly care and consulting elderly care physicians could support general practitioners in providing care for older complex patients. Furthermore, understanding the current concept of patient autonomy seems unjustified in cases of complex older patients.

The cost-effectiveness of grip on challenging behaviour: an economic evaluation of a care programme for managing challenging behaviour.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of implementing the Grip on Challenging Behaviour care programme (GRIP) on dementia special care units in comparison with usual care. METHODS: A stepped wedge design was used. Challenging behaviour and quality of life were measured using the Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and the QUALIDEM. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using the EuroQol-5D. Psychoactive medication use (range 0-5 per measurement) and sick leave were registered. Costs included medication, time spent on challenging behaviour and education. Costs and effects were analysed using linear multilevel regression. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping. RESULTS: Seventeen dementia special care units participated. GRIP led to improvement on the QUALIDEM subscale social relations (1.6; 95% CI 0.18 to 3.4) and on the use of psychoactive medication (-0.73; 95% CI -1.1 to -0.46) and to a decrease in QALYs (-0.02; 95% CI -0.06 to -0.003). No significant effects on CMAI, sick leave and other QUALIDEM subscales were found. The intervention was not cost-effective in comparison with usual care with regard to CMAI score, QALYs and sick leave. The willingness to pay should be 320€/point improvement on the QUALIDEM subscale social relations and 370€/psychoactive medication less to reach a 0.95 probability of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION: It depends on how much society is willing to pay whether GRIP can be considered cost-effective. Because the appropriateness of the current methods for analysing cost-effectiveness in this specific population is uncertain, the positive effects on behaviour, medication and job satisfactions should also be taken in account in the decision making.

[Towards a new system of costs reimbursement in Dutch long-term care facilities: a confidence-building development?]. / Zorgzwaartebekostiging in de AWBZ: een vertrouwenwekkende ontwikkeling?

Against the background of an increasingly ageing society, the Dutch government is redefining its role with regard to providing and financing care for the elderly. This results in restricting the benefits of the Exceptional Medical Expenses Act (AWBZ) to the care for severely dependent elderly - especially old people with dementia - who are in need of long term care that cannot be ensured on the market. In accordance with this policy, geriatric rehabilitation and (medical) care aimed at recovery will be transferred to the basic health insurance. One of the steps towards this restricted coverage of the AWBZ is the introduction of a new, but questionable method of costs reimbursement. Not only does this method lack transparency, it also entails the use of time-consuming, inefficient and bureaucratic questionnaires with a doubtful reliability. The question is raised whether this procedure is a right and trustworthy step to ensure the quality of care for dependent elderly.