Gabapentin, Concomitant Prescription of Opioids, and Benzodiazepines among Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids, commonly used for treating neuropathic pain, may be misused and coprescribed with opioid and benzodiazepine, increasing the risk of mortality and dependency among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: We identified adult kidney transplant recipients who enrolled in Medicare Part D in 2006-2017 using the United States Renal Data System/Medicare claims database. We characterized recipients' post-transplant concomitant prescription of gabapentinoids, opioids, and benzodiazepine stratified by transplant year and recipient factors (age, sex, race, and diabetes). We investigated whether concomitant prescriptions were associated with postkidney transplant mortality using Cox regression. Models incorporated inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Among 63,359 eligible recipients, 13% of recipients filled at least one gabapentinoid prescription within 1 year after kidney transplant. The prevalence of gabapentinoid prescriptions increased by 70% over the study period (16% in 2017 versus 10% in 2006). Compared with nonusers, gabapentinoids users were more likely to have diabetes (55% versus 37%) and obesity (46% versus 34%). Of the 8509 recipients with gabapentinoid prescriptions, 45% were coprescribed opioids, 7% were coprescribed benzodiazepines, and 3% were coprescribed both opioids and benzodiazepines. Compared with no study prescriptions, gabapentinoid monotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 1.32) and combination therapy (gabapentinoids and opioids [aHR=1.49; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.60], gabapentinoids and benzodiazepines [aHR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.08], and coprescribing all three [aHR=1.88; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.98]) were all associated with a higher risk of postkidney transplant mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentinoid coprescription with both benzodiazepines and opioids among kidney transplant recipients increased over time. Kidney transplant recipients prescribed gabapentinoids had a higher risk of post-transplant mortality, and the risk was higher with opioids or benzodiazepine coprescription.

Kidney Transplantation, Immunosuppression and the Risk of Fracture: Clinical and Economic Implications.

Rationale & Objective: Disorders of bone and mineral metabolism frequently develop with advanced kidney disease, may be exacerbated by immunosuppression after kidney transplantation, and increase the risk of fractures. Study Design: Retrospective database study. Setting & Participants: Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States captured in US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims. Exposures: Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after kidney transplantation. Outcomes: The development of fractures, as ascertained using diagnostic codes on Medicare billing claims. Analytical Approach: We used multivariable Cox regression with inverse propensity weighting to compare the incidence of fractures >3 months-to-3 years after kidney transplantation associated with various immunosuppression regimens compared to a reference regimen of antithymocyte globulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse probability treatment weighting. Results: Overall, fractures were identified in 7.5% of kidney transplant recipients (women, 8.8%; men, 6.7%; age < 55 years, 5.9%; age ≥ 55 years, 9.3%). In time-varying regression, experiencing a fracture was associated with a substantially increased risk of subsequent death within 3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.45-3.81). Fractures were also associated with increased Medicare spending (first year: $5,122; second year: $10,890; third year: $11,083; [P < 0.001]). Induction with TMG or ALEM and the avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids significantly reduced the risk of fractures in younger (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73) and older (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94) patients. The avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids with any induction was associated with a reduced risk of fractures in women. Limitations: This was a retrospective study which lacked data on immunosuppression levels. Conclusions: Fractures after kidney transplantation are associated with significantly increased mortality risk and costs. The early avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids after induction with TMG or ALEM reduces the risk of fractures after kidney transplantation and should be considered for patients at high-risk of this complication, including older adults and women.

Resource utilization and costs among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction following a worsening heart failure event.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to characterize healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following a worsening heart failure event. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective observational cohort analysis. Patients with HFrEF were identified from the PINNACLE Registry and linked to a nationwide pharmacy and medical claims database. Worsening heart failure was defined as stable heart failure with a subsequent hospitalization and/or intravenous diuretic therapy. Healthcare resource use and costs in 2015 US dollars were analysed for dispensed prescriptions, outpatient encounters, and hospital encounters. Among 11 064 patients with HFrEF, 3087 (27.9%) experienced a worsening heart failure event during an average follow-up of 973 days. During the first 30 days after the worsening event, 19.8% of patients had hospital readmissions with heart failure as the primary or secondary diagnosis. During that same time period, mean per patient heart failure-related healthcare resource use included 1.3 prescriptions, 0.5 practitioner visits, and 0.5 hospital encounters (admissions, observations, or emergency care), for an average total medical cost of $8779 per patient including $5359 in heart failure-related costs. During the first year following worsening heart failure onset, mean per patient total and heart failure-related costs were $62 615 and $35 329, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden following a worsening heart failure event calls for further review of methods to prevent progressive disease, improve adherence to guideline-directed therapy, and develop novel treatments and care strategies to moderate further progression.

Hydroxychloroquine and maintenance immunosuppression use in kidney transplant recipients: Analysis of linked US registry and claims data.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial drug with immunomodulatory effects used to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and scleroderma. The antiviral effects of HCQ have raised attention in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, although safety is controversial. We examined linkages of national transplant registry data with pharmaceutical claims and Medicare billing claims to study HCQ use among Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients with SLE or scleroderma (2008-2017; N = 1820). We compared three groups based on immunosuppression regimen 7 months-to-1 year post transplant: (a) tacrolimus (Tac) + mycophenolic acid (MPA) + prednisone (Pred) (referent group, 77.7%); (b) Tac + MPA + Pred + HCQ (16.5%); or (c) other immunosuppression + HCQ (5.7%). Compared to the referent group, recipients treated with other immunosuppression + HCQ had a 2-fold increased risk of abnormal ECG or QT prolongation (18.9% vs. 10.7%; aHR,1.12 1.963.42 , p = .02) and ventricular arrhythmias (15.2% vs. 11.4%; aHR,1.00 1.813.29 , p = .05) in the >1-to-3 years post-transplant. Tac + MPA + Pred + HCQ was associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias (13.5% vs. 11.4%; aHR,1.02 1.542.31 , p = .04) and pancytopenia (35.9% vs. 31.4%; aHR,1.03 1.311.68 , p = .03) compared to triple immunosuppression without HCQ. However, HCQ-containing regimens were not associated with an increased risk of death or graft failure. HCQ may be used safely in selected kidney transplant recipients in addition to their maintenance immunosuppression, although attention to arrhythmias is warranted.

Prevalence of narcolepsy and other sleep disorders and frequency of diagnostic tests from 2013-2016 in insured patients actively seeking care.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to describe trends in the 2-year limited duration prevalence of narcolepsy from 2013-2016 in a large insured population with claims activity. Secondary objectives were to assess the prevalence of other sleep disorders and the frequency of diagnostic sleep testing. METHODS: Nationwide medical/prescription claims (Symphony Health) were analyzed to estimate the annual prevalence per 100,000 persons of narcolepsy and other sleep disorders (obstructive sleep apnea, idiopathic hypersomnia, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, periodic limb movement disorder) and the frequency of diagnostic sleep testing. Prevalence was adjusted to the age/sex distribution of the 2016 US census estimates. RESULTS: The prevalence of narcolepsy per 100,000 persons increased 14% from 38.9 in 2013 to 44.3 in 2016. Obstructive sleep apnea prevalence increased 41% over the study period from 2,429 to 3,420 per 100,000. Large increases in prevalence were also seen for idiopathic hypersomnia (32%), periodic limb movement disorder (30%), and rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (64%). For each sleep disorder, prevalence was higher for those with commercial insurance versus Medicare/Medicaid, and markedly lower prevalence was observed for the Northeast compared with the Midwest, South, and Western US regions. The frequency of multiple sleep latency/maintenance of wakefulness testing declined by 20%, and polysomnography declined by 15%. Conversely, home sleep apnea testing increased by 117%. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnea, and the other sleep disorders increased appreciably over the 2013-2016 period. It remains to be determined whether the trends seen in our analyses are due to increased incidence or increased awareness of these conditions.

Transplant recipients are vulnerable to coverage denial under Medicare Part D.

Transplant immunosuppressants are often used off-label because of insufficient randomized prospective trial data to achieve organ-specific US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. Transplant recipients who rely on Medicare Part D for immunosuppressant drug coverage are vulnerable to coverage denial for off-label prescriptions, unless use is supported by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-approved compendia. An integrated dataset including national transplant registry data and 3 years of dispensed pharmacy records was used to identify the prevalence of immunosuppression use that is both off-label and not supported by CMS-approved compendia. Numbers of potentially vulnerable transplant recipients were identified. Off-label and off-compendia immunosuppression regimens are frequently prescribed (3-year mean: lung 66.5%, intestine 34.2%, pancreas 33.4%, heart 21.8%, liver 16.5%, kidney 0%). The annual retail cost of these at-risk medications exceeds $30 million. This population-based study of transplant immunosuppressants vulnerable to claim denials under Medicare Part D coverage demonstrates a substantial gap between clinical practice, current FDA approval processes, and policy mandates for pharmaceutical coverage. This coverage barrier reduces access to life-saving medications for patients without alternative resources and may increase the risk of graft loss and death from medication nonadherence.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitor Therapy: Payer Approvals and Rejections, and Patient Characteristics for Successful Prescribing.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are a novel class of medications for patients with familial hypercholesterolemia or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease requiring additional lipid lowering beyond dietary measures and statin use. Because of the drugs' high cost, rates of prescription approval by payers may be low. We aimed to identify payer approval and rejection rates for PCSK9i prescriptions and the potential factors influencing these rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective, descriptive cohort study using nationwide pharmacy claims linked to electronic medical records from a nationwide data warehouse. The data set includes >220 million patients from all 50 states and all payer types with 5140 distinct health plans. PCSK9i prescriptions were submitted for 51 466 patients in the pharmacy data set. The main outcome was approval or rejection of PCSK9i prescription claims. Factors associated with approval and rejection of these medications in the United States were assessed. RESULTS: Among patients who were prescribed a PCSK9i, 47.0% were approved for coverage by the payer. Variables that were associated with PCSK9i approval included age >65 years (P<0.01), history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (P<0.01), prescription by a cardiologist or nonprimary care provider (P<0.01), statin intolerance (P=0.03), longer statin duration (P=0.01), and noncommercial payers (P<0.01). Higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were not associated with higher approval rates. Commercial third-party payers had the lowest approval rates (24.4%) and Medicare had the highest (60.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of approval for PCSK9i therapy are low, even for patients who appear to meet labeled indications. Although a combination of clinical characteristics increases the likelihood of approval, payer type is the most significant factor.

Identifying Health Information Technology Needs of Oncologists to Facilitate the Adoption of Genomic Medicine: Recommendations From the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Omics and Precision Oncology Workshop.

At the ASCO Data Standards and Interoperability Summit held in May 2016, it was unanimously decided that four areas of current oncology clinical practice have serious, unmet health information technology needs. The following areas of need were identified: 1) omics and precision oncology, 2) advancing interoperability, 3) patient engagement, and 4) value-based oncology. To begin to address these issues, ASCO convened two complementary workshops: the Omics and Precision Oncology Workshop in October 2016 and the Advancing Interoperability Workshop in December 2016. A common goal was to address the complexity, enormity, and rapidly changing nature of genomic information, which existing electronic health records are ill equipped to manage. The subject matter experts invited to the Omics and Precision Oncology Workgroup were tasked with the responsibility of determining a specific, limited need that could be addressed by a software application (app) in the short-term future, using currently available genomic knowledge bases. Hence, the scope of this workshop was to determine the basic functionality of one app that could serve as a test case for app development. The goal of the second workshop, described separately, was to identify the specifications for such an app. This approach was chosen both to facilitate the development of a useful app and to help ASCO and oncologists better understand the mechanics, difficulties, and gaps in genomic clinical decision support tool development. In this article, we discuss the key challenges and recommendations identified by the workshop participants. Our hope is to narrow the gap between the practicing oncologist and ongoing national efforts to provide precision oncology and value-based care to cancer patients.

Diabetes Mellitus in Living Pancreas Donors: Use of Integrated National Registry and Pharmacy Claims Data to Characterize Donation-Related Health Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Living donor pancreas transplant is a potential treatment for diabetic patients with end-organ complications. Although early surgical risks of donation have been reported, long-term medical outcomes in living pancreas donors are not known. METHODS: We integrated national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (1987-2015) with records from a nationwide pharmacy claims warehouse (2005-2015) to examine prescriptions for diabetes medications and supplies as a measure of postdonation diabetes mellitus. To compare outcomes in controls with baseline good health, we matched living pancreas donors to living kidney donors (1:3) by demographic traits and year of donation. RESULTS: Among 73 pancreas donors in the study period, 45 were identified in the pharmacy database: 62% women, 84% white, and 80% relatives of the recipient. Over a mean postdonation follow-up period of 16.3 years, 26.7% of pancreas donors filled prescriptions for diabetes treatments, compared with 5.9% of kidney donors (odds ratio, 4.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-8.93; P = 0.0003). Use of insulin (11.1% vs 0%) and oral agents (20.0% vs 5.9%; odds ratio, 4.50, 95% confidence interval, 2.09-9.68; P = 0.0001) was also higher in pancreas donors. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes is more common after living pancreas donation than after living kidney donation, supporting clinical consequences from reduced endocrine reserve.

Hospital Admissions, Costs, and 30-Day Readmissions Among Newly Diagnosed Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Dabigatran Etexilate or Warfarin.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation such as warfarin and dabigatran is indicated for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at risk of ischemic stroke. Dabigatran etexilate was developed to address the limitations of warfarin, including the need for regular blood monitoring, which has the potential to lead to higher health care resource use, particularly in hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether hospitalization cost, length of hospital stay (LOS), likelihood of readmission within 30 days, and cost of readmissions differed across inpatient encounters among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients that were newly diagnosed and newly treated with either dabigatran or warfarin. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using IMS Health's Charge Detail Master (CDM) database. Hospitalizations were identified based on a primary or secondary AF diagnosis, dabigatran or warfarin use, and a discharge date from January 2011 through March 2012. The identified patients without valvular procedures and transient AF were required to have a minimum of 12 months of pharmacy and private practitioner records prior to the inpatient encounter to ensure that they were newly treated on dabigatran or warfarin. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between treatment cohorts. Outcomes assessed were LOS, 30-day readmissions, and costs. Because individual patients could have more than 1 hospital observation, generalized estimating equations (GEE) with a gamma distribution (log link) were used for the analysis of continuous outcome measures (e.g., LOS and costs) and a binominal distribution for dichotomous outcomes (hospital readmissions). RESULTS: Two cohorts were propensity score matched (1:2) on demographic and clinical characteristics. The dabigatran cohort included 646 hospitalizations, and the warfarin cohort included 1,292 hospitalizations. Hospitalizations were on average 13% shorter (4.8 vs. 5.5 days, P less than 0.001) and cost 12% less ($14,794 vs. $16,826, P = 0.007) when dabigatran was used versus warfarin. No differences in 30-day readmissions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital encounters among newly diagnosed NVAF patients during which warfarin was initiated had longer lengths of stay and incurred higher costs than those during which dabigatran was initiated.

Pharmacogenomic and pharmacogenetic-guided therapy as a tool in precision medicine: current state and factors impacting acceptance by stakeholders.

Pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing is currently available for a wide range of health problems including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, autoimmune disorders, mental health disorders and infectious diseases. PGx contributes important information to the field of precision medicine by clarifying appropriate treatments for specific disease subtypes. Tangible benefits to patients including improved outcomes and reduced total health care costs have been observed. However, PGx-guided therapy faces many barriers to full integration into clinical practice and acceptance by stakeholders, whether practitioner, patient or payer. Each stakeholder has a unique perspective on the role of PGx testing, although all are similarly challenged with demonstrating or appraising its cost-to-benefit value. Coverage by insurers is a critical step in achieving widespread adoption of PGx testing. The acceleration of adoption of precision medicine in general and for PGx testing in particular will be determined by how quickly robust evidence can be accumulated that shows a return on investment for payers in terms of real dollars, for clinicians in terms of patient clinical responses, and for patients in terms of economic, health and quality of life outcomes. Trends in PGx testing utilization and uptake by payers in real-world practice are discussed; the role of pharmacoeconomics in assessing cost-effectiveness is highlighted using a case study in psychiatric care, and several issues that will affect adoption of PGx testing in the United States (US) over the next few years are reviewed.

Pharmacogenetic-guided psychiatric intervention associated with increased adherence and cost savings.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacogenetic testing as a means of guiding treatment decisions is beginning to see wider clinical use in psychiatry. The utility of this genetic information as it pertains to clinical decision making, treatment effectiveness, cost savings, and patient perception has not been fully characterized. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective study, we examined health claims data in order to assess medication adherence rates and healthcare costs for psychiatric patients. METHODS: Individuals for whom pharmacogenetic testing was ordered (cases) were contrasted with those who did not undergo such testing (controls). Cases and controls were propensity score matched in order to minimize risk of confounding in this nonrandomized study. An initial analysis of 111 cases and 222 controls examined both adherence and healthcare costs. A replication study of 116 cases and 232 controls examined adherence alone, as cost data was not available for this latter cohort. RESULTS: Overall, individuals with assay-guided treatment were significantly more medication adherent (P = 1.56 3 10­3; Cohen's d = 0.511) than patients with standard treatment and demonstrated a relative cost savings of 9.5% in outpatient costs over a 4-month follow-up period, or $562 in total savings. CONCLUSIONS: The data show the utility of pharmacogenetic testing in everyday psychiatric clinical practice, as it can lead to improved patient adherence and decreased healthcare costs.

Clinical burden of illness in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the incremental risk of morbidities affecting the cardiovascular, hepatic, gastrointestinal, skeletal, and neuropsychiatric systems in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) compared with a noncancer cohort. METHODS: In a retrospective, matched-control study using US claims databases, noncancer control subjects (n = 3524) were matched 2:1 with patients with newly diagnosed NET (n = 1762) on age, sex, region, hospital data availability, and index year. Rates of select morbidities were compared between patients with NET and control subjects. Incremental risks were analyzed using logistic regressions adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: In the first 3 years after diagnosis in patients with NET versus matched control subjects without cancer, (1) the adjusted risk of cardiovascular morbidities was higher (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; P = 0.0206); (2) the adjusted risk of hepatic or gastrointestinal morbidities was higher (OR, 1.95, P < 0.0001); (3) the adjusted risk of osteoporosis/osteopenia was higher among those 50 years or younger (OR, 3.24; P = 0.0081); and (4) the adjusted risk of anxiety/depression was higher among those 65 years or younger (OR, 1.48; P = 0.0210). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NET have greater clinical burden of disease than matched control subjects with respect to conditions affecting the cardiovascular, hepatic, and gastrointestinal systems. Excess clinical burden of disease with respect to anxiety, depression, osteoporosis, and osteopenia was observed in patients with NET in the younger age groups.