Out-of-pocket Expenses and Time Spent on Clinic Visits Among HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Users and Other Clinic Attendees in Eswatini.

User costs constitute a barrier to the uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but their magnitude appears rarely assessed. In this prospective observational study, we assessed self-reported out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) and time spent on clinic visits during a PrEP demonstration project in Eswatini. At six public primary care clinics, 240 PrEP users and other clinic attendees were interviewed after a clinic visit. Among the 79.2% of clinic attendees reporting any medical OOPE (e.g., expenses for consultations or drugs) and/or non-medical OOPE (e.g., expenses for transport, food, or phone use), the median total OOPE was $1.36 (IQR 0.91-1.96). Non-medical OOPE occurred mostly due to transport expenses. The median travel time for a clinic visit was 1.0 h (IQR 0.67-2.0). The median time spent in the clinic was 2.0 h (IQR 1.15-3.0). The median opportunity cost of a clinic visit was $7.54 (IQR 5.42-11) when valuing time spent on a clinic visit with Eswatini's per-capita gross domestic product. Our findings can guide measures to reduce the user costs of PrEP in Eswatini and other contexts in which oral PrEP is provided through health care facilities.

RESUMEN: Los costes de los usuarios constituyen un obstáculo para la adopción de la profilaxis previa a la exposición al VIH (PrEP), pero su magnitud rara vez se evalúa. En este estudio observacional prospectivo, evaluamos los gastos de bolsillo (OOPE) declarados por los propios usuarios y el tiempo dedicado a las visitas clínicas durante un proyecto de demostración de la PrEP en Eswatini. En seis clínicas públicas de atención primaria, se entrevistó a 240 usuarios de la PrEP y a otros asistentes a la clínica después de una visita a la misma. Entre el 79,2% de los asistentes a las clínicas que declararon algún OOPE médico (por ejemplo, gastos por consultas o medicamentos) y/o OOPE no médico (por ejemplo, gastos de transporte, comida o uso del teléfono), la mediana del OOPE total fue de 1,36 dólares (IQR: 0,91­1,96). Los gastos no médicos se debieron principalmente a los gastos de transporte. La mediana del tiempo de viaje para una visita a la clínica fue de 1,0 horas (IQR 0,67­2,0). La mediana del tiempo empleado en la clínica fue de 2 horas (IQR 1,15­3,0). La mediana del coste de oportunidad de una visita a la clínica fue de 7,65 dólares (IQR 5,55­11) al valorar el tiempo dedicado a una visita a la clínica con el producto interior bruto per cápita de Eswatini. Nuestros resultados pueden orientar las medidas para reducir los costes de uso de la PrEP en Eswatini y en otros contextos en los que se suministra la PrEP oral a través de los centros de salud.

Human resource needs and costs for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis provision in nurse-led primary care in Eswatini and opportunities for task sharing.

BACKGROUND: The global expansion of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) includes health systems that face a shortage of skilled health care workers (HCWs). We estimated the human resource needs and costs for providing PrEP in nurse-led primary care clinics in Eswatini. Furthermore, we assessed potential cost savings from task sharing between nurses and other HCW cadres. METHODS: We conducted a time-and-motion and costing study in a PrEP demonstration project between August 2017 and January 2019. A form for recording time and performed activities ("motion") was filled by HCWs of six primary care clinics. To estimate the human resource needs for specific PrEP activities, we allocated recorded times to performed PrEP activities using linear regression with and without adjusting for a workflow interruption, that is, if a client was seen by different HCWs or by the same HCW at different times. We assessed a base case in which a nurse provides all PrEP activities and five task shifting scenarios, of which four include workflow interruptions due to task sharing between different HCW cadres. RESULTS: On average, PrEP initiation required 29 min (95% CI 25-32) of HCW time and PrEP follow-up 16 min (95% CI 14-18). The HCW time cost $4.55 (uncertainty interval [UI] 1.52-9.69) for PrEP initiation and $2.54 (UI 1.07-4.64) for PrEP follow-up when all activities were performed by a nurse. Time costs were $2.30-4.25 (UI 0.62-9.19) for PrEP initiation and $1.06-2.60 (UI 0.30-5.44) for PrEP follow-up when nurses shared tasks with HCWs from lower cadres. Interruptions of the workflow added, on average, 3.4 min (95% CI 0.69-6.0) to the time HCWs needed for a given number of PrEP activities. The cost of an interrupted workflow was estimated at $0.048-0.87 (UI 0.0098-1.63) depending on whose time need increased. CONCLUSIONS: A global shortage of skilled HCWs could slow the expansion of PrEP. Task shifting to lower-cadre HCW in nurse-led PrEP provision can free up nurse time and reduce the cost of PrEP provision even if interruptions associated with task sharing increase the overall human resource need.

The Costs of Creatinine Testing in the Context of a HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Demonstration Project in Eswatini.

HIV treatment and prevention as well as other chronic disease care can require regular kidney function assessment based on a creatinine test. To assess the costs of creatinine testing in a public health care system, we conducted activity-based costing during a HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) demonstration project in the Hhohho region of Eswatini. Resource use was assessed by a laboratory technician and valued with government procurement prices, public sector salaries, and own cost estimates. Obtaining a blood sample in a clinic and performing a creatinine test in a high-throughput referral laboratory (> 660,000 blood tests, including > 120,000 creatinine tests, in 2018) were estimated to have cost, on average, $1.98 in 2018. Per test, $1.95 were variable costs ($1.38 personnel, ¢39 consumables, and ¢18 other costs) and ¢2.6 were allocated semi-fixed costs (¢1.1 laboratory equipment, ¢0.85 other, ¢0.45 consumables, and ¢1.3 personnel costs). Simulating different utilization of the laboratory indicated that semi-fixed costs of the laboratory (e.g., equipment purchase or daily calibration of the chemistry analyzer) contributed less than variable costs (e.g., per-test personnel time and test reagents) to the average creatinine test cost when certain minimum test numbers can be maintained. Our findings suggest, first, lower creatinine testing costs than previously used in cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of HIV services and, second, that investment in laboratory equipment imposed a relatively small additional cost on each performed test in the high-throughput referral laboratory.

RESUMEN: El tratamiento y la prevención del VIH, así como el cuidado de otras enfermedades crónicas, pueden requerir una evaluación periódica de la función renal basada en una prueba de creatinina. Para evaluar los costes de las pruebas de creatinina en un sistema de atención sanitaria público, realizamos un cálculo de costes basado en actividades durante un proyecto de demostración de profilaxis preexposición al VIH (PrEP) en la región de Hhohho de Eswatini. El uso de los recursos fue evaluado por un técnico de laboratorio y valorado con los precios de adquisición del gobierno, los salarios del sector público y las estimaciones de costes propias. La obtención de una muestra de sangre en una clínica y la realización de una prueba de creatinina en un laboratorio de referencia de alto rendimiento (> 660.000 pruebas de sangre, incluidas > 120.000 pruebas de creatinina, en 2018) se estimó que habían costado, en promedio, $1,98 en 2018. Por prueba, $1,95 eran costes variables ($1,38 de personal, ¢39 de consumibles y ¢18 de otros costes) y ¢2,6 eran costes semifijos asignados (¢1,1 de equipamiento de laboratorio, ¢0,85 de otros, ¢0,45 de consumibles y ¢1,3 de personal). La simulación de utilización diferente del laboratorio indicó que los costes semifijos del laboratorio (por ejemplo, la compra de equipos o la calibración diaria del analizador químico) contribuyeron menos que los costes variables (por ejemplo, el tiempo del personal por prueba y los reactivos de la prueba) al coste medio de la prueba de creatinina cuando se pueden mantener ciertos números mínimos de pruebas. Nuestros resultados sugieren, en primer lugar, que los costes de las pruebas de creatinina son inferiores a los utilizados anteriormente en los análisis de coste y costo-efectividad de los servicios de VIH y, en segundo lugar, que la inversión en equipos de laboratorio supuso un coste adicional relativamente pequeño en cada prueba realizada en el laboratorio de referencia de alto rendimiento.

The Impact of Immediate Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy on Patients' Healthcare Expenditures: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial in Eswatini.

Immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all people living with HIV has important health benefits but implications for the economic aspects of patients' lives are still largely unknown. This stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the causal impact of immediate ART initiation on patients' healthcare expenditures in Eswatini. Fourteen healthcare facilities were randomly assigned to transition at one of seven time points from the standard of care (ART eligibility below a CD4 count threshold) to the immediate ART for all intervention (EAAA). 2261 patients living with HIV were interviewed over the study period to capture their past-year out-of-pocket healthcare expenditures. In mixed-effects regression models, we found a 49% decrease (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36, 0.72, p < 0.001) in past-year total healthcare expenditures in the EAAA group compared to the standard of care, and a 98% (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00, 0.02, p < 0.001) decrease in spending on private and traditional healthcare. Despite a higher frequency of HIV care visits for newly initiated ART patients, immediate ART initiation appears to have lowered patients' healthcare expenditures because they sought less care from alternative healthcare providers. This study adds an important economic argument to the World Health Organization's recommendation to abolish CD4-count-based eligibility thresholds for ART.

RESUMEN: El inicio inmediato de la terapia antirretroviral (TAR) para todas las personas que viven con VIH tiene importantes beneficios para la salud, pero aún se desconocen las implicaciones en el aspecto económico. Este ensayo controlado aleatorizado por clústers (CRT por sus siglas en inglés) por grupos en distintas etapas pretende determinar el impacto del inicio inmediato de la TAR en los gastos sanitarios de los pacientes en Eswatini. Catorce centros sanitarios fueron asignados aleatoriamente a la transición en uno de los siete periodos de la asistencia estándar (elegibilidad para la TAR en niveles definidos de recuento de CD4) a la intervención de TAR inmediato para todos (EAAA). Se entrevistó a 2.261 pacientes con VIH a lo largo del estudio para conocer sus gastos sanitarios del año anterior. Según los modelos de regresión de efectos mixtos, se observó un descenso del 49% (RR: 0,51; IC del 95%: 0,36, 0,72; p<0,001) en el gasto sanitario total del año anterior en el grupo de la EAAA, y un descenso del 98% (RR 0,02; IC del 95%: 0,00, 0,02; p<0,001) en el gasto en asistencia sanitaria privada y tradicional. A pesar de una mayor frecuencia de visitas deatención de VIH para los pacientes que recién comenzaron laTAR, la aplicación inmediata de laTAR redujo los gastos sanitarios de los pacientes dado que buscaron menos atención de proveedores de asistencia sanitaria alternativos. Este estudio añade un importante argumento económico a la recomendación de la Organización Mundial de la Salud de abolir las restricciones de elegibilidad para la terapia antirretroviral basados en el recuento de CD4.

Early access to antiretroviral therapy versus standard of care among HIV-positive participants in Eswatini in the public health sector: the MaxART stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: The WHO recommends antiretroviral treatment (ART) for all HIV-positive patients regardless of CD4 count or disease stage, referred to as "Early Access to ART for All" (EAAA). The health systems effects of EAAA implementation are unknown. This trial was implemented in a government-managed public health system with the aim to examine the "real world" impact of EAAA on care retention and viral suppression. METHODS: In this stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial, 14 public sector health facilities in Eswatini were paired and randomly assigned to stepwise transition from standard of care (SoC) to EAAA. ART-naïve participants ≥18 years who were not pregnant or breastfeeding were eligible for enrolment. We used Cox proportional hazard models with censoring at clinic transition to estimate the effects of EAAA on retention in care and retention and viral suppression combined. RESULTS: Between September 2014 and August 2017, 3405 participants were enrolled. In SoC and EAAA respectively, 12-month HIV care retention rates were 80% (95% CI: 77 to 83) and 86% (95% CI: 83 to 88). The 12-month combined retention and viral suppression endpoint rates were 44% (95% CI: 40 to 48) under SoC compared to 80% (95% CI: 77 to 83) under EAAA. EAAA increased both retention (HR: 1·60, 95% CI: 1·15 to 2·21, p = 0.005) and retention and viral suppression combined (HR: 4.88, 95% CI: 2.96 to 8.05, p < 0.001). We also identified significant gaps in current health systems ability to provide viral load (VL) monitoring with 80% participants in SoC and 66% in EAAA having a missing VL at last contact. CONCLUSIONS: The observed improvement in retention in care and on the combined retention and viral suppression provides an important co-benefit of EAAA to HIV-positive adults themselves, at least in the short term. Our results from this "real world" health systems trial strongly support EAAA for Eswatini and countries with similar HIV epidemics and health systems. VL monitoring needs to be scaled up for appropriate care management.

A stepped-wedge randomised trial on the impact of early ART initiation on HIV-patients' economic outcomes in Eswatini.

Background: Since 2015, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends immediate initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all HIV-positive patients. Epidemiological evidence points to important health benefits of immediate ART initiation; however, the policy's impact on the economic aspects of patients' lives remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial in Eswatini to determine the causal impact of immediate ART initiation on patients' individual- and household-level economic outcomes. Fourteen healthcare facilities were non-randomly matched into pairs and then randomly allocated to transition from the standard of care (ART eligibility at CD4 counts of <350 cells/mm3 until September 2016 and <500 cells/mm3 thereafter) to the 'Early Initiation of ART for All' (EAAA) intervention at one of seven timepoints. Patients, healthcare personnel, and outcome assessors remained unblinded. Data were collected via standardised paper-based surveys with HIV-positive adults who were neither pregnant nor breastfeeding. Outcomes were patients' time use, employment status, household expenditures, and household living standards. Results: A total sample of 3019 participants were interviewed over the duration of the study. The mean number of participants approached at each facility per time step varied from 4 to 112 participants. Using mixed-effects negative binomial regressions accounting for time trends and clustering at the level of the healthcare facility, we found no significant difference between study arms for any economic outcome. Specifically, the EAAA intervention had no significant effect on non-resting time use (RR = 1.00 [CI: 0.96, 1.05, p=0.93]) or income-generating time use (RR = 0.94, [CI: 0.73,1.20, p=0.61]). Employment and household expenditures decreased slightly but not significantly in the EAAA group, with risk ratios of 0.93 [CI: 0.82, 1.04, p=0.21] and 0.92 [CI: 0.79, 1.06, p=0.26], respectively. We also found no significant treatment effect on households' asset ownership and living standards (RR = 0.96, [CI 0.92, 1.00, p=0.253]). Lastly, there was no evidence of heterogeneity in effect estimates by patients' sex, age, education, timing of HIV diagnosis and ART initiation. Conclusions: Our findings do not provide evidence that should discourage further investments into scaling up immediate ART for all HIV patients. Funding: Funded by the Dutch Postcode Lottery in the Netherlands, Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Humboldt-Stiftung), the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in South Africa/Mozambique, British Columbia Centre of Excellence in Canada, Doctors Without Borders (MSF USA), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health and Joachim Herz Foundation. Clinical trial number: NCT02909218 and NCT03789448.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is an incurable virus that attacks the immune system and affects around 39 million people worldwide. Once diagnosed, HIV can be treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) to limit its effects and stop it spreading to other people. HIV rates vary across the world, but the African country of Eswatini has the highest prevalence with more than one in four (27%) people classed as HIV-positive. Until 2015, people living with HIV were typically only treated with ART once their immune system weakened. Recent studies found that starting treatment earlier enhances the positive effects of ART. This caused the World Health Organization (WHO) to change their guidelines and advise people living with HIV to begin ART as soon as they are diagnosed. While antiretroviral drugs are usually provided to patients free of charge, accessing care can be expensive for patients because of high transport costs or lost time from income-generating activities. This means starting treatment earlier and, thus, having more frequent healthcare visits, may result in a greater cost to the patient. The economic impact of this change is unclear, and for patients living in poverty, these added costs can affect their decision on whether to continue treatment. Steinert et al. interviewed 3,019 HIV-patients from 14 health facilities in Eswatini who began treatment with ART either immediately after diagnosis or after their immune system became suppressed. Patients were asked about their time spent being active to generate income, employment status, monthly household expenditures, and household living standards. On average, beginning ART earlier appears to have had no large negative effects on the economic wellbeing of patients. The same results were found for patient groups defined by sex, education, age, and time spent taking ART. These findings suggest that starting ART for HIV as soon as possible offers medical benefits and seems to have no large economic consequences for patients in the short term, even for poorer communities. This adds weight to the WHO advice on HIV treatment and supports the need to continue to deliver effective treatments to countries like Eswatini that have a high rate of HIV infection.