Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Arthrosc Tech ; 12(11): e1899-e1906, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38094973

RESUMO

Successful total shoulder arthroplasty relies on a multitude of factors specific to patients, implant selection, and surgical technique. Among technical factors, correct intraoperative placement of prosthetic components is paramount. Three-dimensional computed tomography has emerged as a vital tool, allowing surgeons to measure glenoid inclination, glenoid version, and humeral head subluxation more accurately and reproducibly. Several commercial preoperative planning software resources are available to determine the optimal size and positioning of prosthetic components yet do so at significant cost and with meaningful time constraints. At our institution, we have applied the principles of these technologies to develop a custom, 3-dimensionally printed glenoid guide for accurate placement of the central pin. In this technical note, we describe our evaluation of patients with glenohumeral arthritis, as well as our step-by-step procedure for designing and printing a custom patient-specific instrumentation glenoid guide for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

2.
Arthroscopy ; 39(11): 2293-2299.e1, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37100215

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate mid-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and return-to-work for workers' compensation (WC) patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) versus propensity-matched, non-WC controls and to determine whether achievement rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) differ between these populations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on WC patients who underwent primary HA for FAIS from 2012 to 2017. WC and non-WC patients were propensity matched on a 1:4 basis by sex, age, and body mass index (BMI). PROs were compared preoperatively and at 5 years postoperatively, employing the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sports-Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. MCID and PASS were calculated using published thresholds for these measures. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs and the presence and timing of return to unrestricted work were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-three WC patients were successfully matched to 172 non-WC controls and followed for 64.2 ± 7.7 months. WC patients demonstrated lower preoperative scores for all measures (P ≤ .031) and worse HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, and VAS pain scores at 5-year follow-up (P ≤ .021). There were no differences in MCID achievement rates or magnitude of change between preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs (P ≥ .093); however, WC patients achieved PASS at lower rates for HOS-ADL and HOS-SS (P ≤ .009). 76.7% of WC and 84.3% of non-WC patients returned to work without restrictions (P = .302) at 7.4 ± 4.4 versus 5.0 ± 3.8 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: WC patients undergoing HA for FAIS report worse preoperative pain and function than non-WC patients and experience worse pain, function, and PASS achievement at 5-year follow-up. However, they demonstrate similar MCID achievement and magnitude improvement between preoperative and 5-year postoperative PROs, and return to work without restrictions at a similar rate to non-WC patients, although they may take longer to do so. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.


Assuntos
Impacto Femoroacetabular , Humanos , Impacto Femoroacetabular/cirurgia , Retorno ao Trabalho , Articulação do Quadril/cirurgia , Seguimentos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Indenização aos Trabalhadores , Artroscopia , Atividades Cotidianas , Dor , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(4): 312-318, 2021 Feb 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33252589

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are associated with substantial morbidity. A better understanding of the costs of PJI treatment can inform prevention, treatment, and reimbursement strategies. The purpose of the present study was to describe direct inpatient medical costs associated with the treatment of hip and knee PJI. METHODS: At a single tertiary care institution, 176 hips and 266 knees that underwent 2-stage revisions for the treatment of PJI from 2009 to 2015 were compared with 1,611 hips and 1,276 knees that underwent revisions for aseptic indications. In addition, 84 hips and 137 knees that underwent irrigation and debridement (I&D) with partial component exchange were compared with 39 hips and 138 knees that underwent partial component exchange for aseptic indications. Line-item details of services billed during hospitalization were retrieved, and standardized direct medical costs were calculated in 2018 inflation-adjusted dollars. RESULTS: The mean direct medical cost of 2-stage revision THA performed for the treatment of PJI was significantly higher than that of aseptic revision THA ($58,369 compared with $22,846, p < 0.001). Similarly, the cost of 2-stage revision TKA performed for the treatment of PJI was significantly higher than that of aseptic revision TKA ($56,900 compared with $24,630, p < 0.001). Even when the total costs of aseptic revisions were doubled for a representative comparison with 2-stage procedures, the costs of PJI procedures were 15% to 28% higher than those of the doubled costs of aseptic revisions (p < 0.001). The mean direct medical cost of I&D procedures for PJI was about twofold higher than of partial component exchange for aseptic indications. CONCLUSIONS: The direct medical costs of operative treatment of PJI following THA and TKA are twofold higher than the costs of similar aseptic revisions. The high economic burden of PJI warrants efforts to reduce the incidence of PJI. Reimbursement schemes should account for the high costs of treating PJI in order to ensure sustainable patient care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Desbridamento/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Reoperação/economia , Irrigação Terapêutica/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
4.
J Hip Preserv Surg ; 7(3): 570-574, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948212

RESUMO

A variety of options exist for management of patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Most studies to date have focused on clinical outcomes; however, there are currently no data on comparative cost of these techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate in-hospital costs between patients managed with periacetabular osteotomy, hip arthroscopy or a combination for DDH. One hundred and nine patients were included: 35 PAO + HA, 32 PAO and 42 HA. There were no significant differences in the demographic parameters. Operative times were significantly different between groups with a mean of 52 min for PAO, 100 min for HA and 155 min for PAO + HA, (P < 0.001). Total direct medical costs were calculated and adjusted to nationally representative unit costs in 2017 inflation-adjusted dollars. Total in-hospital costs were significantly different between each of the three treatment groups. PAO + HA was the most expensive with a median of $21 852, followed by PAO with a median of $15 124, followed by HA with a median of $11 582 (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference between outpatient median costs of $11 385 compared with $24 320 for inpatients (P < 0.001). Procedures with greater complexity were more expensive. However, a change from outpatient to inpatient status with HA moved that group from the least expensive to similar to PAO and PAO + HA. These data provide an important complement to clinical outcomes reports as surgeons and policymakers aim to provide optimal value.

5.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 28(12): 491-499, 2020 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31693530

RESUMO

Meniscal root tears are an increasingly recognized injury leading to notable functional limitations, potential rapid cartilage deterioration of the affected compartment, and subsequent risk of total knee arthroplasty if left untreated. Repair of these tears is advised when articular cartilage remains intact because both medial and lateral meniscus root repairs have demonstrated favorable results. Recent literature demonstrates decreased rates of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty after medial meniscus root repair compared with partial meniscectomy and nonsurgical management. The transtibial pull-out repair technique is most commonly used and provides a biomechanically strong suture construct with standard and familiar knee arthroscopy portals. Furthermore, repair has recently been shown to be economically effective by decreasing overall societal healthcare costs when compared with more conservative management strategies. This review outlines the evaluation, treatment, and documented outcomes of meniscal root repair, which is imperative to the preservation of knee function and maintaining quality of life.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Menisco/lesões , Menisco/cirurgia , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Artroplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Artroscopia/métodos , Cartilagem Articular/patologia , Imagem de Tensor de Difusão , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Joelho/patologia , Meniscectomia , Menisco/anatomia & histologia , Menisco/diagnóstico por imagem , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/economia , Osteoartrite/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Técnicas de Sutura , Suturas
6.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 101(10): 912-919, 2019 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31094983

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (revision THA) occurs for a wide variety of indications and in the United States it is coded under Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) 466, 467, and 468, which do not account for revision etiology, a potentially substantial driver of cost. This study investigates revision THA costs and 30-day complications by indication, both locally and nationally. METHODS: Hospitalization costs and complication rates for 1,422 aseptic revision THAs performed at a high-volume center between 2009 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Additionally, charges for 28,133 revision THAs in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) were converted to costs using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project cost-to-charge ratios, and 30-day complication rates for 3,224 revision THAs were obtained with use of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Costs and complications were compared between revision THAs performed for fracture, wear/loosening, and dislocation/instability with use of simultaneous and pairwise comparisons and a multivariable model accounting for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, age, and sex. RESULTS: Local hospitalization costs for fracture (median, $25,672) were significantly higher than those for wear/loosening ($20,228; p < 0.001) or dislocation/instability ($17,911; p < 0.001), with differences remaining significant even after adjusting for patient comorbidities (p < 0.001). NIS costs for fracture (median, $27,596) were higher than those for other aseptic indications (wear/loosening: $21,176, p < 0.001; dislocation/instability: $16,891, p< 0.001). Local 30-day orthopaedic complication rates for fracture (20.7%) were higher those than for dislocation/instability (9.0%; p = 0.007) and similar to those for wear/loosening (17.6%; p = 0.434). Nationally, combined medical and surgical complication rates for fracture (71.3% of patients with ≥1 complication) were significantly higher than those for wear/loosening (35.2%; p < 0.001) or dislocation/instability (35.1%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization costs for revision THA for fracture were 33% to 48% higher than for all other aseptic revision THAs, both locally and nationally. This increased cost persisted even after multivariable comorbidity adjustment, the current DRG basis for stratifying revision THA reimbursement. Additionally, 30-day complication rates suggest that increased resource utilization for fracture patients continues even after discharge. Indication-specific coding and reimbursement systems are necessary to maintain sustainable access to revision THA for all patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Fraturas Periprotéticas/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Reoperação/economia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/economia , Utilização de Instalações e Serviços/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fraturas Periprotéticas/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Falha de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
7.
Behav Brain Res ; 296: 149-156, 2016 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26367471

RESUMO

The elevated plus maze (EPM) is used to assess anxiety in rodents. Beam-walking tasks are used to assess vestibulomotor function. Brain injury in rodents can disrupt performance on both of these tasks. Developing novel paradigms that integrate tasks like these can reduce the need for multiple tests when attempting to assess multiple behaviors in the same animal. Using adult male rats, we evaluated the use of a modified beam-walking (MBW) apparatus as a surrogate indicator for anxiety. We used a model of blast-induced traumatic brain injury (bTBI). A total of 39 rats were assessed before and at 3, 6, 24, 72, and 168h either post- bTBI (n=33) or no-injury (n=6) using both EPM and MBW. A novel anxiety index was calculated that encompassed peeks and re-emergences on MBW. The proposed MBW anxiety index was compared with the standard anxiety index calculated from exploration into different sections of EPM. Post- bTBI, rats had an increased anxiety index when measured using EPM. Similarly, they peeked or fully emerged less out of the safe box on MBW. It was found that this novel MBW anxiety index captured similar aspects of behavior when compared to the standard anxiety index obtained from EPM. Further, these effects were dissociated from the effects of bTBI on motor function simultaneously measured on MBW. Over the course of 168h post-bTBI, rats gradually recovered on both EPM and MBW. The MBW apparatus succeeded at capturing and dissociating two separate facets of rat behavior, motor function and anxiety, simultaneously.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/fisiopatologia , Comportamento Animal/fisiologia , Pesquisa Comportamental/instrumentação , Traumatismos por Explosões/fisiopatologia , Lesões Encefálicas/fisiopatologia , Desempenho Psicomotor/fisiologia , Animais , Ansiedade/etiologia , Traumatismos por Explosões/complicações , Lesões Encefálicas/complicações , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Masculino , Ratos , Ratos Wistar
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA