Usefulness of the SAGE score to predict elevated values of brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity in Japanese subjects with hypertension.

The score based on the office systolic blood pressure, age, fasting blood glucose level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (SAGE score) has been proposed as a useful marker to identify elevated values of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). The present cross-sectional study was conducted to examine whether the SAGE score is also a useful marker to identify subjects with elevated brachial-ankle PWV values in Japanese subjects with hypertension. We measured the brachial-ankle PWV and calculated the SAGE score in a total of 1019 employees of a Japanese company with hypertension and 817 subjects with hypertension derived from a multicenter study cohort. The analyses in this study were based on data from these two study groups as well as on a composite population of the two (n = 1836). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve to identify subjects with brachial-ankle PWV values of ≥1800 cm/s was over 0.70 in each of the three study groups. Even after adjustments, a SAGE score ≥7 had a significant odds ratio for identifying subjects with brachial-ankle PWV values ≥1800 cm/s in the 1836 study subjects from the composite occupational and multicenter study cohort (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-3.0, P < 0.01). Thus, in Japanese subjects with hypertension, the SAGE score may be a useful marker for identifying subjects with elevated brachial-ankle PWV values.

Assessment of Lower-limb Vascular Endothelial Function Based on Enclosed Zone Flow-mediated Dilation.

This paper proposes a novel non-invasive method for assessing the vascular endothelial function of lower-limb arteries based on the dilation rate of air-cuff plethysmograms measured using the oscillometric approach. The principle of evaluating vascular endothelial function involves flow-mediated dilation. In the study conducted, blood flow in the dorsal pedis artery was first monitored while lower-limb cuff pressure was applied using the proposed system. The results showed blood flow was interrupted when the level of pressure was at least 50 mmHg higher than the subject's lower-limb systolic arterial pressure and that blood flow velocity increased after cuff release. Next, values of the proposed index, %ezFMDL, for assessing the vascular endothelial function of lower-limb arteries were determined from 327 adult subjects: 87 healthy subjects, 150 subjects at high risk of arteriosclerosis and 90 patients with cardiovascular disease (CAD). The mean values and standard deviations calculated using %ezFMDL were 30.5 ± 12.0% for the healthy subjects, 23.6 ± 12.7% for subjects at high risk of arteriosclerosis and 14.5 ± 15.4% for patients with CAD. The %ezFMDL values for the subjects at high risk of arteriosclerosis and the patients with CAD were significantly lower than those for the healthy subjects (p < 0.01). The proposed method may have potential for clinical application.

New assessment of endothelial function measured by short time flow-mediated vasodilation: Comparison with conventional flow-mediated vasodilation measurement.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) is an established method for assessing endothelial function. Measurement of FMD is useful for showing the relationship between atherosclerosis and endothelial function, mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction, and clinical implications including effects of interventions and cardiovascular events. To shorten and simplify the measurement of FMD, we have developed a novel technique named short time FMD (stFMD). We investigated the validity of stFMD for assessment of endothelial function compared with conventional FMD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated stFMD and conventional FMD in 82 subjects including patients with atherosclerotic risk factors and cardiovascular disease (66 men and 16 women, 57 ±â€¯16 years). Both stFMD and conventional FMD were significantly correlated with age, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and baseline brachial artery diameter. In addition, stFMD was significantly correlated with conventional FMD (r = 0.76, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plot analysis showed good agreement b etween stFMD and conventional FMD. Moreover, stFMD in the at risk group and that in the cardiovascular disease group were significantly lower than that in the no risk group (4.6 ±â€¯2.3% and 4.4 ±â€¯2.2% vs. 7.3 ±â€¯1.9%, P < 0.001, respectively). Optimal cutoff value of stFMD for diagnosing atherosclerosis was 7.0% (sensitivity of 71.0% and specificity of 85.0%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that measurement of stFMD, a novel and simple method, is useful for assessing endothelial function. Measurement of stFMD may be suitable for screening of atherosclerosis when repeated measurements of vascular function are required and when performing a clinical trial using a large population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL for Clinical Trial: http://UMIN; Registration Number for Clinical Trial: UMIN000025458.

Assessment of endothelium-independent vasodilation: from methodology to clinical perspectives.

: Vascular response to exogenously administered nitroglycerine, an index of endothelium-independent vasodilation, has been used as a control test for the assessment of endothelium-dependent vasodilation (endothelial function) in humans. However, evidence has been accumulating that not only endothelium-dependent vasodilation but also endothelium-independent vasodilation per se is impaired in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease. Impaired endothelium-independent vasodilation is associated with structural vascular alterations and alterations in vascular smooth muscle cells. Several methods, including assessment of vascular responses to vasoactive agents using angiography in a coronary artery and vascular responses to vasoactive agents using venous occlusion plethysmography and ultrasonography in a peripheral artery, are used to assess endothelium-independent vasodilation in humans. Measurement of endothelium-independent vasodilation is also useful for assessment of atherosclerosis and may be a predictor of future cardiovascular events. In this review, we focus on assessment of endothelium-independent vasodilation from methodology aspects to clinical perspectives.

Reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry is useful for assessment of not only endothelial function but also stenosis of the digital artery.

BACKGROUND: Although reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) is widely used for assessment of endothelial function, RH index (RHI) cannot be measured in some cases when pulse wave amplitude (PWA) is very low. Decrease in PWA is mainly caused by proper palmar digital artery (PPDA) stenosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between PWA measured by RH-PAT and stenosis of the PPDA measured by digital subtraction angiography and to evaluate the limitation of assessment of endothelial function measured by RHI in patients with PPDA stenosis. METHODS: We measured baseline PWA in 51 fingers including the first to third fingers of both hands in 10 patients who had PPDA stenosis and in 66 fingers that were the first fingers of both hands in 33 subjects who had no PPDA stenosis. Severe stenosis was defined as over 75% by lower percent diameter stenosis between two PPDAs in a finger. RESULTS: PWA was significantly correlated with stenosis of the digital artery (r=-0.55; P<0.0001). A PWV value of 300mV was the optimal cut-off value for severe stenosis (sensitivity, 84.0%; specificity, 88.5%). Log RHI was significantly lower in patients with PPDA stenosis than in subjects without PPDA stenosis (0.33±0.27 versus 0.73±0.27, P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: RH-PAT may be useful for assessment of not only endothelial function but also PPDA stenosis. RHI may be underestimated in patients with PPDA stenosis. We should pay attention to low baseline PWA when measuring RHI. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL for clinical trial: http://UMIN; registration number for clinical trial: UMIN000003409.

Brachial artery diameter as a marker for cardiovascular risk assessment: FMD-J study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Baseline brachial artery (BBA) diameter has been reported to be a potential confounding factor of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationships between BBA diameter and cardiovascular risk factors and compare the diagnostic accuracy of BBA diameter in subjects without cardiovascular risk factors and patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) with that of FMD. METHODS: We measured BBA diameter and FMD in 5695 male subjects. In addition, we retrospectively investigated the incidence of cardiovascular events using another population sample consisting of 440 male subjects, to compare the accuracy of BBA diameter with that of FMD in predicting cardiovascular events. RESULTS: BBA diameter and FMD significantly correlated with age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose as well as Framingham risk score. The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and CVD increased with the increase in BBA diameter and FMD. Area under the curve (AUC) value of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for BBA diameter to diagnose subjects without cardiovascular risk factors (0.59 vs. 0.62, p = 0.001) or patients with CVD (0.58 vs. 0.64, p < 0.001) was significantly lower than that for FMD. In the retrospective study, the AUC value of the ROC curve for BBA diameter to predict first major cardiovascular events was significantly lower than that of FMD (0.50 vs. 0.62, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In men, BBA diameter was inferior to FMD for assessment of cardiovascular risk.

Endothelial Function Is Impaired in Patients Receiving Antihypertensive Drug Treatment Regardless of Blood Pressure Level: FMD-J Study (Flow-Mediated Dilation Japan).

Hypertension is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Blood pressure significantly correlates with endothelial function in antihypertensive drug-naive subjects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether treatment status affects the relationship between blood pressure and endothelial function. We measured flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in 2297 subjects, including 1822 antihypertensive drug-naive subjects and 475 treated hypertensive patients. FMD significantly decreased in relation to increase in systolic blood pressure (8.2±3.1% in subjects with systolic blood pressure of <120 mm Hg, 7.5±2.8% for 120-129 mm Hg, 7.1±2.8% for 130-139 mm Hg, and 6.7±2.6% for ≥140 mm Hg; P<0.001). Systolic blood pressure was independently associated with FMD in untreated subjects. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between systolic blood pressure and FMD in treated hypertensive patients (4.6±3.1% in treated hypertensives with systolic blood pressure of <120 mm Hg, 4.8±2.7% for 120-129 mm Hg, 4.9±2.8% for 130-139 mm Hg, and 4.5±2.3% for ≥140 mm Hg; P=0.77). Propensity score matching analysis revealed that the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction defined as FMD of less than the division point for the lowest tertile, and the middle tertile of FMD was significantly higher in treated hypertensive patients than in untreated subjects in all systolic blood pressure categories. Endothelial function assessed by FMD was impaired regardless of the level of blood pressure achieved by antihypertensive drug treatment in hypertensive patients.

Assessment of endothelial function. History, methodological aspects, and clinical perspectives.

In 1986, endothelial function was measured for the first time in patients with atherosclerotic coronary arteries. Since then, several methods for assessment of endothelial function, such as endothelium-dependent vasodilation induced by intra-arterial infusion of vasoactive agents using coronary angiography, Doppler flow guide wire, mercury-filled Silastic strain-gauge plethysmography, flow-mediated vasodilation, reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry, and vascular response using an oscillometric method have been performed in humans. This review focuses on the assessment of endothelial function, including measurement history, methodological issues, and clinical perspectives.

A novel noninvasive and simple method for assessment of endothelial function: enclosed zone flow-mediated vasodilation (ezFMD) using an oscillation amplitude measurement.

BACKGROUND: It is clinically important to estimate the degree of endothelial dysfunction. Several methods have been used to assess endothelial function in humans. Recently, we developed a new noninvasive method for measurement of vascular response to reactive hyperemia in the brachial artery, named enclosed zone flow-mediated vasodilation (ezFMD). The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of ezFMD for assessment of endothelial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: We measured ezFMD by a new device using an oscillometric method and conventional FMD using ultrasonography in 306 subjects, including patients with hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus (218 men and 88 women, 30 ± 16 yr). Univariate regression analysis revealed that ezFMD significantly correlated with age (r = -0.42, P < 0.0001), body mass index (r = -0.13, P = 0.028), systolic blood pressure (r = -0.15, P = 0.009), diastolic blood pressure (r = -0.14, P = 0.011), fasting glucose level (r = -0.27, P = 0.006), smoking (r = -0.21, P = 0.007) and baseline pulse wave amplitude (r = -0.51, P < 0.0001). ezFMD significantly correlated with conventional FMD (r = 0.34, P < 0.0001). Multiple regression analysis revealed that age (P = 0.002), body mass index (P = 0.013), systolic blood pressure (P = 0.009), smoking (P = 0.004) and baseline pulse wave amplitude (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of ezFMD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that measurement of ezFMD, a novel noninvasive and simple method, may be useful for determination of vascular diameter response to reactive hyperemia. Since ezFMD is automatically measured by a device with an oscillometric method, measurement of ezFMD is easier and less biased than that of conventional FMD.

Nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation for assessment of vascular function: a comparison with flow-mediated vasodilation.

OBJECTIVE: Nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation has been used as a control test for flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) to differentiate endothelium-dependent from endothelium-independent response when evaluating endothelial function in humans. Recently, nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation has also been reported to be impaired in patients with atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationships between nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation and cardiovascular risk factors. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We measured nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation and FMD in 436 subjects who underwent health examinations (mean age, 53 ± 19 years; age range, 19-86 years), including patients with cardiovascular diseases. There was a significant relationship between nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation and FMD (r=0.42; P<0.001). Univariate regression analysis revealed that nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation correlated with age (r=-0.34; P<0.001), systolic blood pressure (r=-0.32; P<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (r=-0.24; P<0.001), heart rate (r=-0.21; P<0.001), glucose (r=-0.23; P<0.001), and smoking pack-year (r=-0.12; P=0.01), as well as Framingham risk score (r=-0.30; P<0.001). Nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation was significantly smaller in patients with cardiovascular disease than in both subjects with and without cardiovascular risk factors (10.5 ± 5.6% versus 13.7 ± 5.4% and 15.3 ± 4.3%; P<0.001, respectively), whereas there was no significant difference in nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation between subjects with and without cardiovascular risk factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that male sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, baseline brachial artery diameter, and FMD were independent predictors of nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation may be a marker of the grade of atherosclerosis. FMD should be interpreted as an index of vascular function reflecting both endothelium-dependent vasodilation and endothelium-independent vasodilation in subjects with impaired nitroglycerine-induced vasodilation.